Reply to: Austin et al. CytoJournal 2009;6:12 (Unfounded claims mar scientific critique).
作者信息
Jeronimo Jose, Barone Mark A, Luciani Silvana, Lu Ricky, Sherris Jacqueline, Torod Julie, Tsu Vivien
机构信息
Address: Reproductive Health Global Program, PATH, Seattle, WA, USA.
出版信息
Cytojournal. 2009 Nov 17;6:23. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.57780.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply to: Austin et al. CytoJournal 2009;6:12 (Unfounded claims mar scientific critique).回复：奥斯汀等人。《细胞杂志》2009年；6:12（毫无根据的主张损害科学批评）。
Cytojournal. 2009 Nov 17;6:23. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.57780.
2
The validity and appropriateness of methods, analyses, and conclusions in Rind et al. (1998): A rebuttal of victimological critique from Ondersma et al. (2001) and Dallam et al. (2001).林德等人（1998年）研究中方法、分析及结论的有效性与适当性：对翁德斯马等人（2001年）和达拉姆等人（2001年）受害者学批判的反驳
Psychol Bull. 2001 Nov;127(6):734-58. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.734.
3
Preserving 40% forest cover is a valuable and well-supported conservation guideline: reply to Banks-Leite et al.保留 40%的森林覆盖率是一条有价值且得到广泛支持的保护指导方针：回应 Banks-Leite 等人的观点。
Ecol Lett. 2021 May;24(5):1114-1116. doi: 10.1111/ele.13689. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
Food anticipation in Bmal1-/- and AAV-Bmal1 rescued mice: a reply to Fuller et al.Bmal1基因敲除小鼠和腺相关病毒介导Bmal1基因拯救的小鼠中的食物预期：对富勒等人的回应
J Circadian Rhythms. 2009 Aug 10;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1740-3391-7-11.
5
Reply to Wolf et al.: Why Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) Is Not an Ethical Solution for Stray Cat Management.回复沃尔夫等人：为何诱捕-绝育-放归（TNR）并非管理流浪猫的道德解决方案。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Aug 28;10(9):1525. doi: 10.3390/ani10091525.
6
Commentary on cognitive impairment with toxigenic fungal exposure.关于产毒真菌暴露所致认知障碍的述评
Appl Neuropsychol. 2005;12(3):129-33. doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN1203_1.
7
First CytoJournal Peer-Reviewer's Retreat in 2006 - open access, peer-review, and impact factor.2006年首届《细胞杂志》同行评审员务虚会——开放获取、同行评审与影响因子
Cytojournal. 2006 Mar 27;3:5. doi: 10.1186/1742-6413-3-5.
8
Reply to the letter to the editor 'Reporting of HRQoL results from the PALOMA-2 trial: unfounded conclusions due to highly biased analyses' by Kaiser et al.对Kaiser等人致编辑的信《PALOMA - 2试验中健康相关生活质量结果的报告：因高度有偏倚分析导致的无根据结论》的回复
Ann Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;29(8):1878. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy206.
9
Essay: Avoiding unfounded health claims on small molecules in scientific literature.论文：避免在科学文献中小分子的无根据健康声称。
Bioorg Chem. 2019 May;86:273-276. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
10
The perils of untested assumptions in theory testing: A reply to Patrick et al. (2020).在理论检验中未经验证的假设的危险：对 Patrick 等人（2020 年）的回应。
Personal Disord. 2021 Jan;12(1):24-28. doi: 10.1037/per0000461. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
引用本文的文献
1
Unethical US Government-Funded Cervical Screening Study in India: US Freedom of Information Act Disclosures.美国政府资助的印度不道德宫颈癌筛查研究：美国信息自由法案披露内容
J Healthc Sci Humanit. 2018 Fall;8(2):57-78.
2
Lessons learned from successful Papanicolaou cytology cervical cancer prevention in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.越南社会主义共和国在巴氏细胞学宫颈癌预防方面取得成功的经验教训。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2012 Apr;40(4):355-66. doi: 10.1002/dc.21655. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
本文引用的文献
1
Evidence-based, alternative cervical cancer screening approaches in low-resource settings.资源匮乏地区基于证据的宫颈癌筛查替代方法。
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009 Sep;35(3):147-54. doi: 10.1363/ifpp.35.147.09.
2
Test group biases and ethical concerns mar New England Journal of Medicine articles promoting HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India.测试组偏差和伦理问题影响了《新英格兰医学杂志》中关于在印度农村推广宫颈癌人乳头瘤病毒筛查的文章。
Cytojournal. 2009 Jul 16;6:12. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.53466.
3
HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India.印度农村地区宫颈癌的人乳头瘤病毒筛查
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 16;361(3):305-6; author reply 306.
4
HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India.印度农村地区宫颈癌的人乳头瘤病毒筛查
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 16;361(3):305; author reply 306.
5
HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India.印度农村地区宫颈癌的人乳头瘤病毒筛查
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 16;361(3):305; author reply 306.
6
HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India.印度农村地区宫颈癌的人乳头瘤病毒筛查
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 16;361(3):304-5; author reply 306.
7
HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India.印度农村地区宫颈癌的人乳头瘤病毒筛查
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 16;361(3):304; author reply 306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc090939.
8
Frequency, nature, effects, and correlates of conflicts of interest in published clinical cancer research.已发表的临床癌症研究中利益冲突的频率、性质、影响及相关因素。
Cancer. 2009 Jun 15;115(12):2783-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24315.
9
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's grant-making programme for global health.比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会的全球健康资助项目。
Lancet. 2009 May 9;373(9675):1645-53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60571-7.
10
HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India.印度农村地区宫颈癌的人乳头瘤病毒筛查
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 2;360(14):1385-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808516.
Zotero 插件