• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种手术方式治疗胸中段食管癌的疗效比较。

Therapeutic efficacy comparison of two surgical procedures to treat middle thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong Province, China.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2010 Feb;34(2):272-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0341-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-009-0341-7
PMID:20041250
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of two surgical procedures used to treat middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and compare the results.

METHODS

A total of 167 patients with middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were included in the study, including 102 patients who underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and another 65 who underwent dual-incision esophagectomy through the left chest and neck (Dual-incision). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival rate, and Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic risk factors.

RESULTS

Perioperative complications occurred in 35 patients (21%). The incidence rate of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and anastomotic leakage was higher in the Dual-incision group (p < 0.05), and the incidence rate of gastric retention was higher in the Ivor-Lewis group. However, there were no statistically significant differences. The 3-year local recurrence rate was 37.3% in the Ivor-Lewis group and 40% in the Dual-incision group (p > 0.05). The overall 5-year survival rate was 34.6%; the rates of the Ivor-Lewis group and the Dual-incision group were 36.0 and 32.3%, respectively (p > 0.05). The Cox analysis indicated that the pTNM staging was an independent prognostic risk factor (p = 0.00, hazard ratio = 2.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Both Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and Dual-incision esophagectomy through the left chest and neck are options for treating middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. It is suggested that a patient's individual condition be taken into account when choosing the operative approach.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估两种用于治疗中段食管鳞癌的手术方法的治疗效果,并对其结果进行比较。

方法

共纳入 167 例中段食管鳞癌患者,其中 102 例行 Ivor-Lewis 食管癌切除术,65 例行左胸颈双切口食管癌切除术(双切口)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算生存率,Cox 回归分析识别预后危险因素。

结果

35 例(21%)患者发生围手术期并发症。双切口组喉返神经损伤和吻合口漏的发生率较高(p<0.05),Ivor-Lewis 组胃潴留的发生率较高,但差异无统计学意义。3 年局部复发率 Ivor-Lewis 组为 37.3%,双切口组为 40%(p>0.05)。总 5 年生存率为 34.6%;Ivor-Lewis 组和双切口组分别为 36.0%和 32.3%(p>0.05)。Cox 分析表明,pTNM 分期是独立的预后危险因素(p=0.00,风险比=2.69)。

结论

Ivor-Lewis 食管癌切除术和左胸颈双切口食管癌切除术均为治疗中段食管鳞癌的可选方法。建议在选择手术方式时应考虑患者的个体情况。

相似文献

1
Therapeutic efficacy comparison of two surgical procedures to treat middle thoracic esophageal carcinoma.两种手术方式治疗胸中段食管癌的疗效比较。
World J Surg. 2010 Feb;34(2):272-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0341-7.
2
Curative effect comparison between Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in treatment of middle thoracic esophagus carcinoma.Ivor-Lewis食管切除术与左胸段食管切除术治疗胸段中段食管癌的疗效比较
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 May;59(115):738-41. doi: 10.5754/hge11489.
3
[Efficacy comparison between two-field and three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[胸段食管鳞状细胞癌两野与三野淋巴结清扫术的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):990-994.
4
Clinical study of modified Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy plus adjuvant radiotherapy for local control of stage IIA squamous cell carcinoma in the mid-thoracic esophagus.改良Ivor-Lewis食管癌切除术联合辅助放疗对胸段中段IIA期食管鳞状细胞癌局部控制的临床研究
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
5
[Efficacy comparison of Sweet versus Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[Sweet术式与Ivor-Lewis术式治疗中下段食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):979-984.
6
Long-term outcomes of 530 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.530例接受微创Ivor Lewis食管切除术的食管鳞状细胞癌患者的长期预后
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;117(5):957-969. doi: 10.1002/jso.24997.
7
Mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy for T2 middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.胸腔镜辅助下手术治疗 T2 期中下段胸段食管鳞癌
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar 16;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1361-2.
8
BRF2 as a promising indicator for radical lymph-node dissection surgery in patients with cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the middle thoracic esophagus.BRF2作为胸段中段食管cN0鳞状细胞癌患者根治性淋巴结清扫手术的一个有前景的指标。
Surg Today. 2019 Feb;49(2):158-169. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1711-2. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
9
Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial.Ivor-Lewis 与 Sweet 食管癌切除术治疗食管鳞癌的比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Apr;150(4):292-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2877.
10
Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A STROBE compliant study.Ivor-Lewis术式与Sweet术式治疗胸段中下段食管鳞状细胞癌的比较:一项遵循STROBE规范的研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(6):e14416. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014416.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term effect of hospital volume on the postoperative prognosis of 158,618 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China.医院规模对中国158,618例食管鳞状细胞癌患者术后预后的长期影响。
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 16;12:1056086. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1056086. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A STROBE compliant study.Ivor-Lewis术式与Sweet术式治疗胸段中下段食管鳞状细胞癌的比较:一项遵循STROBE规范的研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(6):e14416. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014416.
3
Mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy for T2 middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

本文引用的文献

1
[The local control of radiotherapy following Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the patients with stage II A middle-third thoracic esophageal cancer].[II A期胸段食管中段癌患者行Ivor-Lewis食管癌切除术后放疗的局部控制情况]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Jul 15;46(14):1048-50.
2
Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma in the middle thoracic esophagus after modified Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.改良Ivor-Lewis食管切除术后胸段中段食管癌的复发模式
World J Surg. 2007 May;31(5):1107-14. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0551-1.
3
Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy.
胸腔镜辅助下手术治疗 T2 期中下段胸段食管鳞癌
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar 16;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1361-2.
4
Comparison of right- and left-approach esophagectomy for elderly patients with operable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity matched study.老年可手术胸段食管鳞状细胞癌患者右进路与左进路食管切除术的比较:一项倾向匹配研究
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(7):1883-1890. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.22.
5
CEP55 overexpression predicts poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.CEP55高表达预示局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者预后不良。
Oncol Lett. 2017 Jan;13(1):236-242. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.5414. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
6
Comparison of short-term outcomes and three yearsurvival between total minimally invasive McKeown and dual-incision esophagectomy.全微创 McKeown 与双切口食管切除术的短期结果和 3 年生存率比较。
Thorac Cancer. 2017 Mar;8(2):80-87. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12404. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
7
Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Paralysis After Esophagectomy for Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma.胸段食管癌食管切除术后喉返神经麻痹的危险因素及临床结局
World J Surg. 2016 Jan;40(1):129-36. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3261-8.
8
Prognostic Nomogram for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Radical Esophagectomy.根治性食管切除术后胸段食管鳞状细胞癌的预后列线图
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 20;10(4):e0124437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124437. eCollection 2015.
9
High risk of unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after esophagectomy using cervical anastomosis.食管切除术采用颈部吻合术后,单侧喉返神经瘫痪的风险较高。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Nov;268(11):1605-10. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1679-7. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
扩大根治性食管切除术联合三野淋巴结清扫术后胸段食管癌的复发模式
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Feb;198(2):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.005.
4
Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.食管癌鳞状细胞癌和腺癌的三野淋巴结清扫术。
Ann Surg. 2002 Aug;236(2):177-83. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200208000-00005.
5
Two-field dissection is enough for esophageal cancer.对于食管癌,两野清扫就足够了。
Dis Esophagus. 2001;14(2):98-103. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00164.x.
6
Total thoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal carcinoma: has it been worth it?食管癌全胸段食管切除术:这值得吗?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Sep;16(3):261-5. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00223-7.
7
Proposed revision of the staging classification for esophageal cancer.食管癌分期分类的拟议修订
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 Mar;115(3):660-69; discussion 669-70. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70332-0.
8
Pattern of recurrence after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus.胸段食管鳞状细胞癌行扩大根治性食管切除术加三野淋巴结清扫术后的复发模式。
World J Surg. 1997 Mar-Apr;21(3):275-81. doi: 10.1007/s002689900228.