Suppr超能文献

老年可手术胸段食管鳞状细胞癌患者右进路与左进路食管切除术的比较:一项倾向匹配研究

Comparison of right- and left-approach esophagectomy for elderly patients with operable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity matched study.

作者信息

Liu Qianwen, Chen Junying, Wen Jing, Yang Hong, Hu Yi, Luo Kongjia, Tan Zihui, Fu Jianhua

机构信息

Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(7):1883-1890. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

the right- and left-approach open esophagectomies remain the general procedures among patients with operable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The choice between the two approaches for elderly patients is controversial.

METHODS

we performed a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to compare the impact of right- and left-approach esophagectomies on survival and perioperative complications of elderly ESCC patients. Patients aged over 70 receiving esophagectomy to treat the thoracic ESCC were retrospectively retrieved.

RESULTS

a total of 276 patients were included in the study. Among them, 75 (27.2%) patients received right-approach esophagectomy. After match, 114 patients (57 pairs) undertook right or left-approach esophagectomy displayed no difference among clinicopathological characteristics. Both the overall survival (54.6% 32.6%, P=0.036) and disease-free survival (52.7% 20.2%, P=0.021) were significant better in right-approach group, along with better lymph node resection, and lower incidence of recurrence. However, increased incidences of postoperative pneumonia (P=0.040), respiratory failure (P=0.028), and sub-clinical anastomotic leak (P=0.032) were found in right-approach group as well, although the perioperative mortality was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Right-approach esophagectomy should be accepted as a preferential surgical approach for elderly patients with ESCC.

摘要

背景

右胸入路和左胸入路开放食管切除术仍是可手术切除的胸段食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的常用手术方式。对于老年患者,两种入路方式的选择存在争议。

方法

我们进行了1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析,以比较右胸入路和左胸入路食管切除术对老年ESCC患者生存及围手术期并发症的影响。回顾性检索年龄超过70岁接受食管切除术治疗胸段ESCC的患者。

结果

本研究共纳入276例患者。其中,75例(27.2%)患者接受了右胸入路食管切除术。匹配后,114例患者(57对)接受了右胸或左胸入路食管切除术,其临床病理特征无差异。右胸入路组的总生存率(54.6%对32.6%,P = 0.036)和无病生存率(52.7%对20.2%,P = 0.021)均显著更好,淋巴结清扫效果更好,复发率更低。然而,右胸入路组术后肺炎(P = 0.040)、呼吸衰竭(P = 0.028)和亚临床吻合口漏(P = 0.032)的发生率也有所增加,尽管两组围手术期死亡率相似。

结论

右胸入路食管切除术应被视为老年ESCC患者的优先手术入路。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验