• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of right- and left-approach esophagectomy for elderly patients with operable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity matched study.老年可手术胸段食管鳞状细胞癌患者右进路与左进路食管切除术的比较:一项倾向匹配研究
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(7):1883-1890. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.22.
2
[Efficacy of surgical resection of left and right transthoracic approaches for middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[左右经胸入路手术切除治疗胸段中段食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效]
Ai Zheng. 2009 Dec;28(12):1260-4. doi: 10.5732/cjc.008.10660.
3
Comparison of short-term outcomes between 2- and 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.食管癌2野与3野淋巴结清扫的短期疗效比较。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Nov 1;30(11):1-8. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox096.
4
Left versus right approach for middle and lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched study.食管中下段鳞状细胞癌的左胸入路与右胸入路:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 13;12:858660. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.858660. eCollection 2022.
5
Comparison of Outcomes Between McKeown and Sweet Esophagectomy in the Elderly Patients for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.老年食管鳞癌患者行 McKeown 和 Sweet 食管切除术的疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Cancer Control. 2020 Jan-Dec;27(1):1073274820904700. doi: 10.1177/1073274820904700.
6
Lymph Node Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.机器人辅助与电视胸腔镜辅助食管癌切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的淋巴结评估:一项倾向评分匹配分析
World J Surg. 2018 Feb;42(2):590-598. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4179-0.
7
Right Compared With Left Thoracic Approach Esophagectomy for Patients With Middle Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.中段食管鳞状细胞癌患者右胸与左胸入路食管癌切除术的比较
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 26;10:536842. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.536842. eCollection 2020.
8
Thoracic Duct Resection During Esophagectomy Does Not Contribute to Improved Prognosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched-Cohort Study.胸导管切除术在食管癌中的应用并未改善食管鳞癌患者的预后:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(12):4053-4061. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07627-x. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
9
[Comparison of surgical outcomes after different surgical approach for middle or lower thoracic esophageal squamous cancer].
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;15(4):373-6.
10
Extended Right Thoracic Approach Compared With Limited Left Thoracic Approach for Patients With Middle and Lower Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Three-year Survival of a Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Trial.经右胸入路与经左胸入路治疗中下段食管鳞癌的前瞻性随机开放标签临床试验:3 年生存分析。
Ann Surg. 2018 May;267(5):826-832. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002280.

引用本文的文献

1
Left versus right approach for middle and lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched study.食管中下段鳞状细胞癌的左胸入路与右胸入路:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 13;12:858660. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.858660. eCollection 2022.
2
Effect of different surgical approaches on the prognosis of patients with postoperative radiotherapy for stage IIB-IVA esophageal squamous cancer.不同手术入路对 IIB-IVA 期食管鳞癌术后放疗患者预后的影响。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Aug 30;20(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02739-3.
3
Management of elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer.老年食管鳞癌患者的管理。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 5;52(8):816-824. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyac067.
4
Esophageal Cancer in Elderly Patients, Current Treatment Options and Outcomes; A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.老年患者的食管癌:当前治疗选择与结果;系统评价与汇总分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 27;13(9):2104. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092104.
5
Right Compared With Left Thoracic Approach Esophagectomy for Patients With Middle Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.中段食管鳞状细胞癌患者右胸与左胸入路食管癌切除术的比较
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 26;10:536842. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.536842. eCollection 2020.
6
Comparison of Ivor Lewis and Sweet esophagectomy for middle and lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and pooled analysis.Ivor Lewis术式与Sweet术式治疗中下段食管鳞状细胞癌的比较:一项系统评价与汇总分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Oct 10;27:100497. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100497. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
Comparison of short-term outcomes following minimally invasive versus open Sweet esophagectomy for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.微创与开放 Sweet 食管胃交界部 Siewert Ⅱ型腺癌切除术近期疗效比较。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Jun;11(6):1487-1494. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13415. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
8
Influencing factors of postoperative early delayed gastric emptying after minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.微创Ivor-Lewis食管切除术后早期胃排空延迟的影响因素
World J Clin Cases. 2019 Feb 6;7(3):291-299. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i3.291.

本文引用的文献

1
NHE9 induces chemoradiotherapy resistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by upregulating the Src/Akt/β-catenin pathway and Bcl-2 expression.NHE9通过上调Src/Akt/β-连环蛋白通路和Bcl-2表达诱导食管鳞状细胞癌的放化疗耐药。
Oncotarget. 2015 May 20;6(14):12405-20. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3618.
2
Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial.Ivor-Lewis 与 Sweet 食管癌切除术治疗食管鳞癌的比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Apr;150(4):292-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2877.
3
Thirty-day mortality underestimates the risk of early death after major resections for thoracic malignancies.30天死亡率低估了胸部恶性肿瘤大手术后早期死亡的风险。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Nov;98(5):1769-74; discussion 1774-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.024. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
4
Estimating propensity scores and causal survival functions using prevalent survival data.使用现患生存数据估计倾向得分和因果生存函数。
Biometrics. 2012 Sep;68(3):707-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01754.x. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
5
Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.微创食管切除术的结果:超过 1000 例患者的回顾。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):95-103. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603.
6
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.微创与开放手术治疗食管癌的疗效比较:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1887-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. Epub 2012 May 1.
7
Postoperative radiotherapy improved survival of poor prognostic squamous cell carcinoma esophagus.术后放疗改善了预后不良的食管鳞癌患者的生存。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Aug;90(2):435-42. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.002.
8
Outcome of elderly patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma after surgery.老年食管鳞癌患者术后的结局。
Br J Surg. 2010 Jun;97(6):862-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7005.
9
Extended esophagectomy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer: minor effect of age alone in determining the postoperative course and survival.高龄食管癌患者行扩大根治术:单纯年龄对术后过程和生存的影响较小。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1572-80. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0966-7. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
10
Resection for esophageal cancer in the elderly.老年食管癌切除术。
Thorac Surg Clin. 2009 Aug;19(3):333-43. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2009.06.002.

老年可手术胸段食管鳞状细胞癌患者右进路与左进路食管切除术的比较:一项倾向匹配研究

Comparison of right- and left-approach esophagectomy for elderly patients with operable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity matched study.

作者信息

Liu Qianwen, Chen Junying, Wen Jing, Yang Hong, Hu Yi, Luo Kongjia, Tan Zihui, Fu Jianhua

机构信息

Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(7):1883-1890. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.22.

DOI:10.21037/jtd.2017.06.22
PMID:28839986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5543008/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

the right- and left-approach open esophagectomies remain the general procedures among patients with operable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The choice between the two approaches for elderly patients is controversial.

METHODS

we performed a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to compare the impact of right- and left-approach esophagectomies on survival and perioperative complications of elderly ESCC patients. Patients aged over 70 receiving esophagectomy to treat the thoracic ESCC were retrospectively retrieved.

RESULTS

a total of 276 patients were included in the study. Among them, 75 (27.2%) patients received right-approach esophagectomy. After match, 114 patients (57 pairs) undertook right or left-approach esophagectomy displayed no difference among clinicopathological characteristics. Both the overall survival (54.6% 32.6%, P=0.036) and disease-free survival (52.7% 20.2%, P=0.021) were significant better in right-approach group, along with better lymph node resection, and lower incidence of recurrence. However, increased incidences of postoperative pneumonia (P=0.040), respiratory failure (P=0.028), and sub-clinical anastomotic leak (P=0.032) were found in right-approach group as well, although the perioperative mortality was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Right-approach esophagectomy should be accepted as a preferential surgical approach for elderly patients with ESCC.

摘要

背景

右胸入路和左胸入路开放食管切除术仍是可手术切除的胸段食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的常用手术方式。对于老年患者,两种入路方式的选择存在争议。

方法

我们进行了1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析,以比较右胸入路和左胸入路食管切除术对老年ESCC患者生存及围手术期并发症的影响。回顾性检索年龄超过70岁接受食管切除术治疗胸段ESCC的患者。

结果

本研究共纳入276例患者。其中,75例(27.2%)患者接受了右胸入路食管切除术。匹配后,114例患者(57对)接受了右胸或左胸入路食管切除术,其临床病理特征无差异。右胸入路组的总生存率(54.6%对32.6%,P = 0.036)和无病生存率(52.7%对20.2%,P = 0.021)均显著更好,淋巴结清扫效果更好,复发率更低。然而,右胸入路组术后肺炎(P = 0.040)、呼吸衰竭(P = 0.028)和亚临床吻合口漏(P = 0.032)的发生率也有所增加,尽管两组围手术期死亡率相似。

结论

右胸入路食管切除术应被视为老年ESCC患者的优先手术入路。