Departamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
J Med Food. 2009 Dec;12(6):1386-92. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2009.0024.
A comparison of alizarin red (AR) and fluorescein (FL) as target molecules in oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC)-like methods is reported. Galangin, apigenin, ferulic acid, and coumaric acid decreased AR initial consumption rate, whereas quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, caffeic acid, and sinapic acid inhibited its consumption through an induction time, associated with a repair mechanism. On the other hand, all compounds protected FL with a clear induction time. AR was more selective and provides ORAC-AR values considerably smaller for compounds of low reactivity. The ORAC-AR value for luteolin was nearly 200 times that of coumaric acid. However, the ratio of ORAC-FL values for luteolin and coumaric acid was only 1.2. This different selectivity implies that AR provides ORAC values more related to reactivity than FL. ORAC-AR values of infusions were considerably smaller than the corresponding ORAC-FL values. These differences are interpreted in terms of the capacity of FL to generate induction times, irrespective of the reactivity of the additive. It is proposed that comparison of ORAC-AR and ORAC-FL values could afford a rough estimation of the average reactivity of the antioxidants titrated by the ORAC-FL methodology.
报告了茜素红(AR)和荧光素(FL)作为氧自由基吸收能力(ORAC)类似方法中目标分子的比较。山柰素、芹菜素、阿魏酸和咖啡酸降低了 AR 的初始消耗率,而槲皮素、山柰酚、木犀草素、咖啡酸和芥子酸则通过诱导时间抑制其消耗,同时伴随着修复机制。另一方面,所有化合物均通过清晰的诱导时间保护了 FL。AR 更具选择性,并且对于低反应性的化合物,提供的 ORAC-AR 值要小得多。木犀草素的 ORAC-AR 值几乎是肉桂酸的 200 倍。然而,木犀草素和肉桂酸的 ORAC-FL 值之比仅为 1.2。这种不同的选择性意味着 AR 提供的 ORAC 值与反应性比 FL 更相关。输注物的 ORAC-AR 值明显小于相应的 ORAC-FL 值。这些差异是根据 FL 生成诱导时间的能力来解释的,而与添加剂的反应性无关。提出比较 ORAC-AR 和 ORAC-FL 值可以粗略估计用 ORAC-FL 方法滴定的抗氧化剂的平均反应性。