Suppr超能文献

后路或前路髂嵴取骨用于脊柱融合术后镇痛的局部吗啡给药:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

Local administration of morphine for analgesia after autogenous anterior or posterior iliac crest bone graft harvest for spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

机构信息

The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, Canada K1Y4E9.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2010 Mar 1;110(3):928-33. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181cb3f32. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Harvesting of iliac crest graft for spinal fusions is associated with a number of patients reporting residual or chronic pain at the harvest site. Various interventions, including morphine infiltration, have been proposed to minimize the associated pain.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study comparing intraoperative infiltration of 5 mg morphine (treatment) versus saline (placebo) into the iliac crest harvest site for patients undergoing elective spinal surgery. Patients with myelopathy, excessive perioperative opioid use (60 mg equivalent morphine/d or more), or multilevel (>3 levels) spinal surgery were excluded. Postoperative administration of morphine (recovery room and patient-controlled analgesia) was standardized. Numerical pain scores specific for the iliac crest site were determined in the immediate postoperative period and at 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Of the 54 patients randomized, 47 (87%) were available for review with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The groups were similar in baseline age, gender, and comorbidities. There was no significant difference between groups in total use of postoperative morphine during the first 24 hours (P = 0.48). Repeated measures analysis of variance demonstrated no interacting effect of group over time for hip pain at rest (P = 0.94), hip pain while moving (P = 0.90), spine pain at rest (P = 0.99), or spine pain while moving (P = 0.83). The proportion of patients reporting iliac crest pain at 1-year follow-up was the same between groups (P = 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated that there are no additional benefits for the use of intraoperative infiltration of morphine into the iliac crest harvest site during spinal fusions.

摘要

背景

取髂嵴骨植骨融合术会导致部分患者在取骨部位出现残留或慢性疼痛。为了减轻这种相关疼痛,已经提出了各种干预措施,包括吗啡浸润。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究,比较了在择期脊柱手术中,将 5 毫克吗啡(治疗组)与生理盐水(安慰剂组)注入髂嵴取骨部位的效果。排除了有脊髓病、围手术期阿片类药物使用过量(等效吗啡 60 毫克/天或以上)或多节段(>3 个节段)脊柱手术的患者。术后吗啡(恢复室和患者自控镇痛)的使用是标准化的。在术后即刻、术后 3、6 和 12 个月,专门针对髂嵴部位的数字疼痛评分。

结果

在随机的 54 名患者中,有 47 名(87%)在至少 1 年的随访期内可供审查。两组在基线年龄、性别和合并症方面相似。两组在术后 24 小时内总使用吗啡方面无显著差异(P = 0.48)。重复测量方差分析显示,组间在静息时髋关节疼痛(P = 0.94)、运动时髋关节疼痛(P = 0.90)、静息时脊柱疼痛(P = 0.99)或运动时脊柱疼痛(P = 0.83)方面无交互作用。在 1 年随访时,报告髂嵴疼痛的患者比例在两组之间相同(P = 0.95)。

结论

本研究表明,在脊柱融合术中,将吗啡注入髂嵴取骨部位并不能带来额外的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验