Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Am Antiq. 2001 Apr;66(2):315-31.
Although the practice of food storage is important to many questions addressed by archaeologists, demonstrating its presence in archaeological contexts can be difficult or impossible. One potentially useful approach to meat storage is the concept of the Drying Utility Index, introduced by Lewis Binford (1978) to predict which carcass portions, with attached bone, will be selected for storage by drying. However, this index has not been widely used by zooarchaeologists, at least in part because the calculations involved in its derivation are extremely complex. This paper presents a new, simplified index, the Meat Drying Index, which is easier to calculate and more transparent than the Drying Utility Index, yet which retains all of its key attributes. This new index is applied to caribou bone samples from two regions: Binford's (1978) Nunamiut data from northern Alaska, and the contents of three caches from the Barren Grounds of Canada, near Baker Lake, Nunavut. In both cases, the Meat Drying Index correlates with the observed element frequencies as well as, or better than, the original Drying Utility Index. As a result, the new index may prove applicable to element distributions from a wide range of archaeological contexts in which storage of meat by drying is suspected.
尽管食物储存的做法对考古学家研究的许多问题都很重要,但在考古背景下证明其存在可能很困难或不可能。肉类储存的一种潜在有用方法是干燥效用指数的概念,该概念由刘易斯·宾福德(Lewis Binford)(1978 年)提出,用于预测哪些附有骨头的兽体部位将通过干燥选择储存。然而,该指数尚未被动物考古学家广泛使用,至少部分原因是其推导涉及的计算极其复杂。本文提出了一个新的简化指数,即肉干燥指数,它比干燥效用指数更容易计算且更透明,但保留了其所有关键属性。这个新指数应用于来自两个地区的驯鹿骨骼样本:来自阿拉斯加北部的宾福德(1978 年)努纳武特数据,以及努纳武特贝克湖附近巴伦支地区的三个贮藏地的内容物。在这两种情况下,肉干燥指数与观察到的元素频率相关,或者优于原始干燥效用指数。因此,新指数可能适用于怀疑通过干燥储存肉类的各种考古背景下的元素分布。