• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与滑动低摩擦弹性结扎系统的静摩擦阻力。

Static frictional resistance with the slide low-friction elastomeric ligature system.

作者信息

Jones Steven P, Ben Bihi Saida

机构信息

Unit of Orthodontics, UCL Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, London, UK.

出版信息

Aust Orthod J. 2009 Nov;25(2):136-41.

PMID:20043548
Abstract

AIM

This ex-vivo study compared the static frictional resistance of a low-friction ligation system against a conventional elastomeric module, and studied the effect of storage in a simulated oral environment on the static frictional resistance of both ligation systems.

METHODS

Eighty stainless steel brackets were tested by sliding along straight lengths of 0.018 inch round and 0.019 x 0.025 inch rectangular stainless steel wires ligated with either conventional elastomerics or the Slide system (Leone, Florence, Italy). During the tests the brackets and wires were lubricated with artificial saliva. A specially constructed jig assembly was used to hold the bracket and archwire securely. The jig was clamped in an Instron universal load testing machine. Crosshead speed was controlled via a microcomputer connected to the Instron machine. The static frictional forces at 0 degree bracket/wire angulation were measured for both systems, fresh from the pack and after storage in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for 24 hours.

RESULTS

The results of this investigation demonstrated that the Slide ligatures produced significantly lower static frictional resistance than conventional elastomeric modules in the fresh condition and after 24 hours of storage in a simulated oral environment (p < 0.001). Storage for 24 hours in artificial saliva had no effect on the static frictional resistance of conventional elastomeric modules and the Slide system (p = 0.525).

CONCLUSIONS

The claim by the manufacturer that the Slide system produces lower frictional resistance than conventional elastomeric modules is upheld.

摘要

目的

本体外研究比较了低摩擦结扎系统与传统弹性模块的静摩擦阻力,并研究了在模拟口腔环境中储存对两种结扎系统静摩擦阻力的影响。

方法

八十个不锈钢托槽通过沿着0.018英寸圆形和0.019×0.025英寸矩形不锈钢丝的直线段滑动进行测试,这些钢丝分别用传统弹性体或Slide系统(意大利佛罗伦萨的Leone公司)结扎。在测试过程中,托槽和钢丝用人造唾液润滑。使用专门构建的夹具组件牢固地固定托槽和弓丝。夹具夹在Instron万能材料试验机中。通过连接到Instron机器的微型计算机控制十字头速度。测量了两种系统在托槽/钢丝成角0度时的静摩擦力,一次是刚从包装中取出时,另一次是在37℃的人造唾液中储存24小时后。

结果

本研究结果表明,在新鲜状态下以及在模拟口腔环境中储存24小时后,Slide结扎产生的静摩擦阻力明显低于传统弹性模块(p < 0.001)。在人造唾液中储存24小时对传统弹性模块和Slide系统的静摩擦阻力没有影响(p = 0.525)。

结论

制造商关于Slide系统产生的摩擦阻力低于传统弹性模块的说法得到了支持。

相似文献

1
Static frictional resistance with the slide low-friction elastomeric ligature system.与滑动低摩擦弹性结扎系统的静摩擦阻力。
Aust Orthod J. 2009 Nov;25(2):136-41.
2
Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.使用3种弹性体组件时的抗滑动性能
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jun;127(6):670-5; quiz 754. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.025.
3
Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.带有金属槽插入物的多晶陶瓷托槽的静摩擦阻力
Aust Orthod J. 2006 Nov;22(2):147-52.
4
In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance with 5 ligation methods and Gianelly-type working wires.5 种结扎方法和 Gianelly 型工作丝的体外评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jul;138(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.023.
5
Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.牙弓凸度和弓丝类型对摩擦力的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jul;136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.026.
6
Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets.牙齿排齐过程中摩擦力的评估:一个带有3个非平齐托槽的实验模型
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 May;133(5):708-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.06.021.
7
Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.正畸托槽与弓丝之间的摩擦阻力:一项体外研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Mar 1;12(2):91-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1015.
8
Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional slots, glazed slots and metal slot inserts.具有传统槽沟、釉质槽沟和金属槽沟嵌体的多晶陶瓷托槽的静摩擦阻力
Aust Orthod J. 2007 May;23(1):36-40.
9
In vitro evaluation of the frictional forces between brackets and archwire with three passive self-ligating brackets.三种被动自锁托槽的弓丝与托槽间摩擦力的体外评估。
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Dec;31(6):643-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp054. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
10
Archwire seating forces produced by different ligation methods and their effect on frictional resistance.不同结扎方法产生的弓丝就位力及其对摩擦阻力的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2005 Jun;27(3):302-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji008.

引用本文的文献

1
Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.不同结扎系统的自锁托槽和传统托槽的摩擦行为
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Jul;77(4):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0035-3. Epub 2016 May 24.
2
Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket protectors.两种正畸托槽保护装置产生的摩擦力比较
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Jan-Feb;19(1):86-91. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.086-091.oar.
3
Traditional elastic ligatures versus slide ligation system. A morphological evaluation.
传统弹性结扎线与滑动结扎系统:形态学评估
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2013 Jul 15;6(1):15-24. eCollection 2013.