Suppr超能文献

描述了 4 类肩部手术后的临床结果和术后物理治疗服务的利用情况。

Description of clinical outcomes and postoperative utilization of physical therapy services within 4 categories of shoulder surgery.

机构信息

Intermountain Healthcare, The Orthopedic Specialty Hospital, Murray, UT 84107, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Jan;40(1):20-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3043.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the clinical outcomes following outpatient physical therapy for postoperative rehabilitation in 4 categories of shoulder surgery. Furthermore, we sought to determine if differences in outcomes between genders existed.

BACKGROUND

Improving the quality of care for patients following shoulder surgery requires an understanding of the clinical outcomes resulting from current clinical practice.

METHODS

This study included 856 patients (43.7% female; mean +/- SD age, 51.8 +/- 14.2 years) who received outpatient physical therapy following shoulder surgery. Standardized methods for classification of patients to type of shoulder surgery and collection of outcome variables were used. Data were gathered from 57 therapists working in 12 clinics. Patients included had been classified into 1 of 4 surgical categories: repair of a unidirectional instability, rotator cuff repair, rotator cuff repair with a subacromial decompression, or subacromial decompression alone. Descriptive statistics were calculated for baseline characteristics of patients in each surgical category. For all patients, scores on the Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) were obtained at the initial and final physical therapy visits, and the change between visits was calculated. Data on number of physical therapy sessions and length of stay (LOS) were collected. For each surgical category, independent-samples t tests were used to determine differences between genders for each initial and final clinical outcome of pain and disability, change scores, utilization of visits, and LOS. The percentage of patients who achieved a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the DASH was also determined for each surgical group. For each gender in each surgical category, paired t tests were used to determine if patients achieved significant change in pain and disability.

RESULTS

Means for each clinical outcome for the initial and final pain and disability scores, change scores, and the percentage of patients that achieved an MCID are provided. Significant differences were observed between genders for clinical outcomes. In the group treated with unilateral instability repair, women reported significantly greater initial disability than men, and their DASH change scores were significantly greater. In the group that had rotator cuff repairs, women reported significantly greater disability initially and at the final follow-up. In the group that had rotator cuff repairs combined with subacrominal decompression, women reported significantly greater disability initially and greater change in DASH scores. Females also reported greater change in their pain scores than males (P<.05). There were no significant differences between men and women in the subacromial decompression group (P<.05). There were no significant differences between genders for number of physical therapy visits or LOS. Men and women in each surgical category achieved clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement for pain and disability during treatments (P<.01). Greater than 75% of patients achieved an MCID (15 points) on the DASH score in each surgical category (range, 75.6%-94.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences were observed between men and women in 4 postoperative surgical categories in each of the clinical outcomes but not for number of physical therapy visits or LOS. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful pain and disability improvements were reported for each gender within each shoulder category. Results from this study may help therapists estimate the prognosis of males and females receiving nonstandardized postoperative physical therapy in 4 different shoulder surgical categories.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapy, level 2b.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

目的

描述 4 类肩部手术后门诊物理治疗的术后康复临床结果。此外,我们还试图确定性别之间的结果是否存在差异。

背景

为了提高肩部手术后患者的护理质量,需要了解当前临床实践所产生的临床结果。

方法

本研究纳入了 856 名(女性占 43.7%;平均年龄+/-标准差,51.8+/-14.2 岁)接受肩部手术后门诊物理治疗的患者。使用标准化方法对患者进行肩部手术类型分类,并收集结果变量数据。数据来自 12 个诊所的 57 名治疗师。患者分为 4 种手术类别之一:单向不稳定修复、肩袖修复、肩袖修复伴肩峰下减压术或单纯肩峰下减压术。对每个手术类别的患者的基线特征进行描述性统计分析。对于所有患者,在初始和最后一次物理治疗就诊时,使用手臂肩和手残疾问卷(DASH)和数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)获得评分,并计算就诊期间的变化。收集物理治疗次数和住院时间(LOS)的数据。对于每个手术类别,使用独立样本 t 检验确定性别之间每个初始和最终疼痛和残疾、变化评分、就诊利用和 LOS 的差异。还确定了每个手术组中达到 DASH 最小临床重要差异(MCID)的患者比例。对于每个手术类别的每个性别,使用配对 t 检验确定患者是否在疼痛和残疾方面取得显著变化。

结果

提供了每个初始和最终疼痛和残疾评分、变化评分的临床结果的平均值,以及达到 MCID 的患者比例。性别之间在临床结果上存在显著差异。在接受单侧不稳定修复治疗的患者中,女性报告的初始残疾程度明显大于男性,并且 DASH 变化评分明显更大。在接受肩袖修复的患者中,女性最初和最后随访时报告的残疾程度更大。在接受肩袖修复合并肩峰下减压术的患者中,女性最初和 DASH 评分的变化更大。女性也报告疼痛评分的变化大于男性(P<.05)。肩峰下减压组的男女之间无显著差异(P<.05)。物理治疗次数和 LOS 无性别差异。每个手术类别的男性和女性在治疗期间在疼痛和残疾方面均取得了有临床意义和统计学意义的改善(P<.01)。每个手术类别中,DASH 评分达到 MCID(15 分)的患者比例均超过 75%(范围,75.6%-94.5%)。

结论

在每个术后手术类别中,男性和女性在 4 个临床结果方面存在差异,但在物理治疗次数或 LOS 方面没有差异。每个肩部类别中的男女均报告了统计学上显著且具有临床意义的疼痛和残疾改善。本研究结果可能有助于治疗师估计在 4 种不同肩部手术类别中接受非标准化术后物理治疗的男性和女性的预后。

证据水平

治疗,2b 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验