Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 3959 Broadway, BHS1-115, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Resuscitation. 2010 Feb;81(2):224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.024. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
The return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is a primary goal of resuscitation. For neonatal resuscitation the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) recommends oxygen concentrations ranging from 21% to 100%.
This study (a) compared the efficacy of resuscitation with room air (RA) or 100% O(2) in achieving ROSC in 46 neonatal mice with circulatory collapse induced by lethal hypoxia-ischemia (HI) and (b) determined whether re-oxygenation with RA or 100% O(2) alters the extent of HI cerebral injury in mice with preserved systemic circulation (n=31). We also compared changes in generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cerebral mitochondria in response to re-oxygenation with RA or 100% O(2).
In HI-mice with collapsed circulation re-oxygenation with 100% O(2) versus RA resulted in significantly greater rate of ROSC. In HI-mice with preserved systemic circulation and regional (unilateral) cerebral ischemia the restoration of cerebral blood flow was significantly faster upon re-oxygenation with 100% O(2), than RA. However, no difference in the extent of brain injury was detected. Regardless of the mode of re-oxygenation, reperfusion in these mice was associated with markedly accelerated ROS production in brain mitochondria.
In murine HI associated with circulatory collapse the resuscitation limited to re-oxygenation with 100% O(2) is superior to the use of RA in achievement of the ROSC. However, in HI-mice with preserved systemic circulation hyperoxic re-oxygenation has no benefit over the normoxic brain recovery.
自主循环恢复(ROSC)是复苏的主要目标。对于新生儿复苏,国际复苏联合会(ILCOR)建议氧浓度范围为 21%至 100%。
本研究(a)比较了在 46 只因致死性缺氧-缺血(HI)导致循环衰竭的新生鼠中,使用空气(RA)或 100% O(2)进行复苏以实现 ROSC 的效果;(b)确定在保留全身循环的 HI 小鼠中,用 RA 或 100% O(2) 重新给氧是否改变 HI 脑损伤的程度(n=31)。我们还比较了 RA 或 100% O(2) 再给氧时脑线粒体中活性氧(ROS)生成的变化。
在循环衰竭的 HI 小鼠中,用 100% O(2) 再给氧与用 RA 相比,ROS 恢复率显著更高。在保留全身循环和局部(单侧)脑缺血的 HI 小鼠中,用 100% O(2) 再给氧比用 RA 恢复脑血流的速度明显更快。然而,没有检测到脑损伤程度的差异。无论再给氧的方式如何,这些小鼠的再灌注都与脑线粒体中 ROS 产生的明显加速有关。
在与循环衰竭相关的 HI 中,与使用 RA 相比,限制于 100% O(2) 再给氧的复苏在实现 ROSC 方面更优。然而,在保留全身循环的 HI 小鼠中,高氧再给氧与正常氧脑恢复相比没有益处。