Sabbatani S, Fiorino S
Unita Operativa di Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Civile di Budrio, Bologna, Italy.
Infez Med. 2009 Dec;17(4):261-75.
The Antonine Plague, which flared up during the reign of Marcus Aurelius from 165 AD and continued under the rule of his son Commodus, played such a major role that the pathocenosis in the Ancient World was changed. The spread of the epidemic was favoured by the occurrence of two military episodes in which Marcus Aurelius himself took part: the Parthian War in Mesopotamia and the wars against the Marcomanni in northeastern Italy, in Noricum and in Pannonia. Accounts of the clinical features of the epidemic are scant and disjointed, with the main source being Galen, who witnessed the plague. Unfortunately, the great physician provides us with only a brief presentation of the disease, his aim being to supply therapeutic approaches, thus passing over the accurate description of the disease symptoms. Although the reports of some clinical cases treated by Galen lead us to think that the Antonine plague was caused by smallpox, palaeopathological confirmation is lacking. Some archaeological evidence (such as terracotta finds) from Italy might reinforce this opinion. In these finds, some details can be observed, suggesting the artist's purpose to represent the classic smallpox pustules, typical signs of the disease. The extent of the epidemic has been extensively debated: the majority of authors agree that the impact of the plague was severe, influencing military conscription, the agricultural and urban economy, and depleting the coffers of the State. The Antonine plague affected ancient Roman traditions, also leaving a mark on artistic expression; a renewal of spirituality and religiousness was recorded. These events created the conditions for the spread of monotheistic religions, such as Mithraism and Christianity. This period, characterized by health, social and economic crises, paved the way for the entry into the Empire of neighbouring barbarian tribes and the recruitment of barbarian troops into the Roman army; these events particularly favoured the cultural and political growth of these populations. The Antonine Plague may well have created the conditions for the decline of the Roman Empire and, afterwards, for its fall in the West in the fifth century AD.
安东尼瘟疫于公元165年在马可·奥勒留统治期间爆发,并在他儿子康茂德的统治下持续肆虐,其影响极为重大,改变了古代世界的疾病群落。两场军事活动助力了这场瘟疫的传播,马可·奥勒留本人也参与其中:一场是在美索不达米亚的帕提亚战争,另一场是在意大利东北部、诺里库姆和潘诺尼亚与马科曼尼人的战争。关于这场瘟疫临床特征的记载稀少且零散,主要来源是目睹了这场瘟疫的盖伦。遗憾的是,这位伟大的医生仅对该疾病做了简要介绍,其目的是提供治疗方法,因而略过了对疾病症状的准确描述。尽管盖伦治疗的一些临床病例报告让我们认为安东尼瘟疫是由天花引起的,但缺乏古病理学的确证。来自意大利的一些考古证据(如赤陶制品发现)可能会强化这一观点。在这些发现中,可以观察到一些细节,表明艺术家意在描绘典型的天花脓疱,即该病的典型症状。这场瘟疫的波及范围一直备受广泛争议:大多数作者都认同这场瘟疫的影响极为严重,影响了军事征兵、农业和城市经济,并耗尽了国家的财力。安东尼瘟疫影响了古罗马的传统,也在艺术表达上留下了印记;有记录显示当时人们的精神性和宗教性有所复兴。这些事件为密特拉教和基督教等一神论宗教的传播创造了条件。这个以健康、社会和经济危机为特征的时期,为邻近蛮族部落进入帝国以及蛮族军队被招募进入罗马军队铺平了道路;这些事件尤其促进了这些族群的文化和政治发展。安东尼瘟疫很可能为罗马帝国的衰落创造了条件,进而导致其在公元五世纪在西方覆灭。