Vairo Giampietro L, Miller Sayers John, McBrier Nicole M, Buckley William E
J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):e80-9. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.80E.
Manual therapists question integrating manual lymphatic drainage techniques (MLDTs) into conventional treatments for athletic injuries due to the scarcity of literature concerning musculoskeletal applications and established orthopaedic clinical practice guidelines. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide manual therapy clinicians with pertinent information regarding progression of MLDTs as well as to critique the evidence for efficacy of this method in sports medicine. We surveyed English-language publications from 1998 to 2008 by searching PubMed, PEDro, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus databases using the terms lymphatic system, lymph drainage, lymphatic therapy, manual lymph drainage, and lymphatic pump techniques. We selected articles investigating the effects of MLDTs on orthopaedic and athletic injury outcomes. Nine articles met inclusion criteria, of which 3 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We evaluated the 3 RCTs using a validity score (PEDro scale). Due to differences in experimental design, data could not be collapsed for meta-analysis. Animal model experiments reinforce theoretical principles for application of MLDTs. When combined with concomitant musculoskeletal therapy, pilot and case studies demonstrate MLDT effectiveness. The best evidence suggests that efficacy of MLDT in sports medicine and rehabilitation is specific to resolution of enzyme serum levels associated with acute skeletal muscle cell damage as well as reduction of edema following acute ankle joint sprain and radial wrist fracture. Currently, there is limited high-ranking evidence available. Well-designed RCTs assessing outcome variables following implementation of MLDTs in treating athletic injuries may provide conclusive evidence for establishing applicable clinical practice guidelines in sports medicine and rehabilitation.
由于关于肌肉骨骼应用的文献稀缺以及既定的骨科临床实践指南,手法治疗师对将手动淋巴引流技术(MLDTs)纳入运动损伤的传统治疗方法提出质疑。本系统评价的目的是为手法治疗临床医生提供有关MLDTs进展的相关信息,并对该方法在运动医学中的疗效证据进行评判。我们通过使用“淋巴系统”“淋巴引流”“淋巴治疗”“手动淋巴引流”和“淋巴泵技术”等术语检索PubMed、PEDro、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆和SPORTDiscus数据库,对1998年至2008年的英文出版物进行了调查。我们选择了研究MLDTs对骨科和运动损伤结果影响的文章。9篇文章符合纳入标准,其中3篇为随机对照试验(RCTs)。我们使用有效性评分(PEDro量表)对这3项RCTs进行了评估。由于实验设计的差异,数据无法合并进行荟萃分析。动物模型实验强化了MLDTs应用的理论原则。当与伴随的肌肉骨骼治疗相结合时,试点和案例研究证明了MLDT的有效性。最佳证据表明,MLDT在运动医学和康复中的疗效特定于与急性骨骼肌细胞损伤相关的酶血清水平的消退以及急性踝关节扭伤和桡骨腕部骨折后水肿的减轻。目前,可用的高级别证据有限。设计良好的RCTs评估MLDTs在治疗运动损伤后结果变量,可能为在运动医学和康复中建立适用的临床实践指南提供确凿证据。