• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新的州策略以满足长期护理需求。

New state strategies to meet long-term care needs.

机构信息

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning andEvaluation, US Department of Health andHuman Services inWashington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):49-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0521.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0521
PMID:20048360
Abstract

Consumer-directed long-term care service programs give participants the flexibility they want, while reducing unmet need for home and community-based services and supports. States' efforts to expand such programs under Medicaid, including those supported by federal Cash and Counseling demonstration and evaluation grants, are often hindered by challenges related to costs, staffing and organizational issues, new infrastructure requirements, and resistance from stakeholders. Yet states have developed a number of successful strategies for overcoming these challenges, even in financially trying times. Their experiences offer valuable insights, guidance, and encouragement to other states contemplating consumer-directed service expansions.

摘要

消费者导向的长期护理服务计划为参与者提供了他们想要的灵活性,同时减少了对家庭和社区为基础的服务和支持的未满足需求。各州在医疗补助计划下扩大这类计划的努力,包括那些得到联邦现金和咨询示范和评估赠款支持的计划,往往受到与成本、人员配备和组织问题、新基础设施要求以及利益相关者抵制相关的挑战的阻碍。然而,各州已经制定了许多成功的策略来克服这些挑战,即使在财政困难时期也是如此。它们的经验为其他考虑扩大消费者导向服务的州提供了宝贵的见解、指导和鼓励。

相似文献

1
New state strategies to meet long-term care needs.新的州策略以满足长期护理需求。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):49-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0521.
2
Long-Term Care: Funding of Long-Term Care.长期护理:长期护理的资金筹集
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2015 Dec 28:1-52.
3
Long-term care: funding and insurance. End-of-year issue brief.长期护理:资金与保险。年终问题简报。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2009 Jan 5:1-24.
4
Long-term care: funding of long-term care. Issue brief.长期护理:长期护理的资金筹集。问题简报。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2012 Dec 31:1-46.
5
Long-term care: funding of long-term care.长期护理:长期护理的资金筹集
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2013:1-67.
6
Long-term care: funding of long-term care.长期护理:长期护理的资金筹集
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2012 Jan 3:1-37.
7
Applying market-based reforms to long-term care.将市场化改革应用于长期护理。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):74-80. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0559.
8
Supplemental Security Income for the Aged, Blind and Disabled (SSI) program demonstration project; treatment of cash received and conserved to pay for medical or social services--SSA. Notice.老年人、盲人和残疾人补充保障收入(SSI)计划示范项目;为支付医疗或社会服务而收到和留存的现金的处理——社会保障局。通知。
Fed Regist. 1998 Nov 2;63(211):58802-4.
9
Consumer-directed home and community services programs in eight states: policy issues for older people and government.八个州的消费者导向型家庭和社区服务项目:老年人与政府面临的政策问题
J Aging Soc Policy. 2001;12(4):1-26. doi: 10.1300/J031v12n04_01.
10
Medicare and medicaid in long-term care.医疗保险和医疗补助在长期护理中的作用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):22-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0494.

引用本文的文献

1
Fewer potentially avoidable health care events in rural veterans with self-directed care versus other personal care services.与其他个人护理服务相比,农村退伍军人中自我管理护理的潜在可避免医疗保健事件更少。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 May;70(5):1418-1428. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17656. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
2
The Burden and Benefits of Caregiving: A Latent Class Analysis.照顾者的负担和获益:潜在类别分析。
Gerontologist. 2019 Nov 16;59(6):1078-1091. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny022.
3
An Inventory of Publicly Funded Participant-Directed Long-Term Services and Supports Programs in the United States.
美国公共资助的参与者主导的长期服务与支持项目清单
J Disabil Policy Stud. 2016 Mar;26(4):245-251. doi: 10.1177/1044207314555810. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
4
Participants' Assessment of the Impact of Behavioral Health Self-Direction on Recovery.参与者对行为健康自我导向对康复影响的评估。
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Oct;52(7):781-92. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-9999-0. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
5
Gender Differences in Institutional Long-Term Care Transitions.机构长期护理过渡中的性别差异
Womens Health Issues. 2015 Sep-Oct;25(5):441-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
6
The opportunity costs of informal elder-care in the United States: new estimates from the American Time Use Survey.美国非正式老年人照料的机会成本:来自美国时间使用调查的新估计
Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun;50(3):871-82. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12238. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
7
Allowing spouses to be paid personal care providers: spouse availability and effects on Medicaid-funded service use and expenditures.允许配偶成为个人护理提供者:配偶的可用性及其对医疗补助计划资助的服务使用和支出的影响。
Gerontologist. 2012 Aug;52(4):517-30. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr102. Epub 2011 Oct 19.