• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险和医疗补助在长期护理中的作用。

Medicare and medicaid in long-term care.

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):22-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0494.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0494
PMID:20048356
Abstract

Medicare and Medicaid, two publicly funded health programs, both cover populations in need of long-term care, but they are poorly coordinated. Gaps often exist in some services while there is overlap in others. This can lead to inefficient delivery of services and confusion among program recipients and providers alike. Spending on postacute services in Medicare and long-term care services in Medicaid has grown more rapidly than enrollment in either program since 1999. Although growing numbers of people receive home and community-based services paid for by the two programs, there are wide variations across states and among target groups. The system of long-term care is in need of structural reform.

摘要

医疗保险和医疗补助是两个公共资助的健康计划,都覆盖有长期护理需求的人群,但它们之间协调不善。在某些服务中存在差距,而在其他服务中则存在重叠。这可能导致服务提供效率低下,并且计划接受者和提供者都感到困惑。自 1999 年以来,医疗保险中急性后期服务和医疗补助中长期护理服务的支出增长速度超过了两个计划的参保人数增长速度。尽管越来越多的人接受由这两个计划支付的家庭和社区为基础的服务,但各州和各目标群体之间存在很大差异。长期护理系统需要进行结构性改革。

相似文献

1
Medicare and medicaid in long-term care.医疗保险和医疗补助在长期护理中的作用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):22-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0494.
2
Long-term care: who gets it, who provides it, who pays, and how much?长期护理:谁需要它,谁提供它,谁支付,以及支付多少?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):11-21. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0535.
3
How to share the burden. Long-term care reform in the 1990s.如何分担负担。20世纪90年代的长期护理改革。
Brookings Rev. 1994 Spring;12(2):16-21.
4
The special health care needs of the elderly.老年人的特殊医疗保健需求。
Baxter Health Policy Rev. 1996;2:317-49.
5
Home care in New York City: providers, payers, and clients.纽约市的居家护理:提供者、支付方与客户。
Pap Ser United Hosp Fund N Y. 1987 Feb(6):1-46.
6
Perspectives. Solution gap looms for financing baby boomers' future long-term care needs.观点。为婴儿潮一代未来的长期护理需求提供资金的解决方案缺口日益凸显。
Med Health. 1998 Mar 23;52(12):suppl 1-4.
7
Recent trends in Medicaid expenditures.医疗补助支出的近期趋势。
Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl. 1992:271-83.
8
Effects of state Medicaid home care Medicare maximization programs on Medicare expenditures.州医疗补助家庭护理医疗保险最大化计划对医疗保险支出的影响。
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2003;22(3):19-40. doi: 10.1300/J027v22n03_02.
9
State expenditures on home and community-based care for disabled elders.国家用于为残疾老年人提供居家和社区护理的支出。
Fact Sheet (Cent Home Care Policy Res). 2000 Fall-Winter(1):1-2.
10
Long-term care: funding of long-term care. Issue brief.长期护理:长期护理的资金筹集。问题简报。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2012 Dec 31:1-46.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in Medicaid and Medicare physician reimbursements for ophthalmic procedures.医疗补助计划(Medicaid)和医疗保险(Medicare)在眼科手术医生报销方面存在的差异。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0324383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324383. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating the health outcomes of aging in place: the role of medicaid aging waiver program on U.S. older adults.评估就地老化的健康结果:医疗补助老龄化豁免计划对美国老年人的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):2104. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19498-3.
3
Personal assistants in England and the factors associated with absenteeism.
英格兰的个人助理以及与旷工相关的因素。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;10:970370. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.970370. eCollection 2022.
4
Caregiver resource utilization: Intellectual and development disability and dementia.照护者资源利用:智力和发育障碍与痴呆。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Nov;34(6):1468-1476. doi: 10.1111/jar.12889. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
5
Long-term care service mix in the Veterans Health Administration after home care expansion. Veterans Health Administration 扩大家政服务后长期护理服务组合
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56(6):1126-1136. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13687. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
6
Online peer to peer support: Qualitative analysis of UK and US open mental health Facebook groups.在线点对点支持:对英国和美国开放心理健康Facebook群组的定性分析。
Digit Health. 2020 Dec 10;6:2055207620979209. doi: 10.1177/2055207620979209. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
7
Association Between Exposure to Hurricane Irma and Mortality and Hospitalization in Florida Nursing Home Residents.佛罗里达州养老院居民暴露于飓风“艾尔玛”与死亡率和住院率之间的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019460. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19460.
8
Assessment of changes in place of death of older adults who died from dementia in the United States, 2000-2014: a time-series cross-sectional analysis.评估 2000-2014 年美国死于痴呆症的老年人死亡地点的变化:时间序列横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 11;20(1):765. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08894-0.
9
Implementing a Standardized Transition Care Plan in Skilled Nursing Facilities.在熟练护理设施中实施标准化的过渡护理计划。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Aug;39(8):855-862. doi: 10.1177/0733464818783689. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
10
Effects of Early Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans on Health Expenditure.早期双重资格特殊需要计划对卫生支出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2165-2184. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12778. Epub 2017 Oct 18.