Lo Li-Wei, Higa Satoshi, Lin Yenn-Jiang, Chang Shih-Lin, Tuan Ta-Chuan, Hu Yu-Feng, Tsai Wen-Chin, Tsao Hsuan-Ming, Tai Ching-Tai, Ishigaki Sugako, Oyakawa Asuka, Maeda Minetaka, Suenari Kazuyoshi, Chen Shih-Ann
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Jun 1;21(6):640-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01679.x. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
The noncontact mapping (NCM) system possesses the merit of global endocardial recording for unipolar and activation mapping.
We aimed to evaluate the unipolar electrogram characteristics and activation pattern over the bipolar complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) sites during atrial fibrillation (AF).
Twenty patients (age 55 +/- 11 years old, 15 males) who underwent NCM and ablation of AF (paroxysmal/persistent = 13/7) were included. Both contact bipolar (32-300 Hz) and NCM virtual unipolar electrograms (0.5-300 Hz) were simultaneously recorded along with the activation pattern (total 223 sites, 11 +/- 4 sites/patient). A CFAE was defined as a mean bipolar cycle length of <or= 120 ms with an intervening isoelectric interval of more than 50 ms (Group 1A, n = 63, rapid repetitive CFAEs) or continuous fractionated activity (Group 1B, n = 59, continuous fractionated CFAEs), measured over a 7.2-second duration. Group 2 consisted of those with a bipolar cycle length of more than 120 ms (n = 101).
The Group 1A CFAE sites exhibited a shorter unipolar electrogram cycle length (129 +/- 11 vs 164 +/- 20 ms, P < 0.001), and higher percentage of an S-wave predominant pattern (QS or rS wave, 63 +/- 13% vs 35 +/- 13%, P < 0.001) than the Group 2 non-CFAE sites. There was a linear correlation between the bipolar and unipolar cycle lengths (P < 0.001, R = 0.87). Most of the Group 1A CFAEs were located over arrhythmogenic pulmonary vein ostia or nonpulmonary vein ectopy with repetitive activations from those ectopies (62%) or the pivot points of the turning wavefronts (21%), whereas the Group 1B CFAEs exhibited a passive activation (44%) or slow conduction (31%).
The bipolar repetitive and continuous fractionated CFAEs represented different activation patterns. The former was associated with an S wave predominant unipolar morphology which may represent an important focus for maintaining AF.
非接触式标测(NCM)系统具有用于单极和激动标测的全心内膜记录优点。
我们旨在评估心房颤动(AF)期间双极碎裂心房电图(CFAE)部位的单极电图特征和激动模式。
纳入20例接受NCM和AF消融术的患者(年龄55±11岁,男性15例)(阵发性/持续性=13/7)。同时记录接触式双极电图(32 - 300 Hz)和NCM虚拟单极电图(0.5 - 300 Hz)以及激动模式(共223个部位,每位患者11±4个部位)。CFAE定义为平均双极周期长度≤120 ms,其间等电位间期超过50 ms(1A组,n = 63,快速重复CFAE)或连续碎裂活动(1B组,n = 59,连续碎裂CFAE),在7.2秒时长内测量。2组由双极周期长度超过120 ms的患者组成(n = 101)。
1A组CFAE部位的单极电图周期长度较短(129±11 vs 164±20 ms,P < 0.001),且S波为主模式(QS或rS波)的百分比高于2组非CFAE部位(63±13% vs 35±13%,P < 0.001)。双极和单极周期长度之间存在线性相关性(P < 0.001,R = 0.87)。大多数1A组CFAE位于致心律失常性肺静脉开口或非肺静脉异位处,并伴有来自这些异位灶(62%)或折返波前的枢轴点(21%)的重复激动,而1B组CFAE表现为被动激动(44%)或缓慢传导(31%)。
双极重复和连续碎裂CFAE代表不同的激动模式。前者与S波为主的单极形态相关,这可能代表维持AF的一个重要病灶。