Lo Li-Wei, Lin Yenn-Jiang, Chang Shih-Lin, Hu Yu-Feng, Chung Fa-Po, Chen Shih-Ann
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital; Institute of Clinical Medicine, and Cardiovascular Research Institute, National Yang-Ming University, 201, Sec. 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Aug 9;19(9):86. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0884-4.
Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, the long-term procedural outcome remains suboptimal and there is a frequent need for repeat ablation procedure, especially in patients with non-paroxysmal AF. The review article summarizes the rationales, recent evidences, and strategies of ablation of extra-PV sites and its clinical outcomes.
It is a consensus that durable PV isolations are a definite therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF. In non-paroxysmal AF, many laboratories still believe that adequate substrate ablation outside PVs is definitely required. Empirical linear ablation is not recommended because of difficulty in achieving complete linear block, unless macro-reentry atrial tachycardia developed during procedure. Most of laboratories applied complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation after PV isolation in non-paroxysmal AF, but the efficacy is limited in the long-term follow-up studies. A combined approach using CFAE, non-linear similarity, and phase mapping strategy to identify rotors or focal sources for substrate modification increases the ablation outcome, when compared to CFAE ablation alone. Provocative test with mapping of non-PV triggers is also recommended in all patients to improve long-term ablation success. Ablation beyond PV isolation is important, especially in non-paroxysmal AF patients, to modify the diseased atrial substrate and eliminate the non-PV triggers, which in turn improve the ablation outcome.
肺静脉隔离是房颤消融的基石。然而,长期手术效果仍不尽人意,且常常需要重复消融手术,尤其是在非阵发性房颤患者中。这篇综述文章总结了肺静脉外部位消融的理论依据、最新证据、策略及其临床结果。
阵发性房颤患者实现持久的肺静脉隔离无疑是一种明确的治疗方法,这已成为共识。对于非阵发性房颤,许多实验室仍认为,肺静脉外进行充分的基质消融是绝对必要的。不建议进行经验性线性消融,因为很难实现完全线性阻滞,除非术中出现大折返性房性心动过速。大多数实验室在非阵发性房颤患者肺静脉隔离后应用碎裂心房电图(CFAE)消融,但在长期随访研究中疗效有限。与单独使用CFAE消融相比,采用CFAE、非线性相似性和相位映射策略相结合的方法来识别转子或局灶性起源以进行基质改良,可提高消融效果。还建议对所有患者进行非肺静脉触发灶标测的激发试验,以提高长期消融成功率。肺静脉隔离以外的消融很重要,尤其是对于非阵发性房颤患者,可改良病变心房基质并消除非肺静脉触发灶,进而改善消融效果。