Centre of Public Health of Alzira, Conselleria de Sanidad, C/ Pau, s/n, E-46600, Alzira, Valencia, Spain.
J Food Prot. 2010 Jan;73(1):81-7. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.1.81.
Fifty-five bovine, 50 equine, 60 ovine, and 50 porcine carcasses were sampled in a slaughterhouse in eastern Spain. Two samples were taken from each carcass, one using the excision method and the other using the swabbing method. Four different materials were used for swabbing: cellulose, polyurethane, or viscose sponges, and medical gauze. Samples were collected at the end of the process by four different people before the carcasses were taken to the cooler. The samples were examined for total viable bacteria counts (TVCs) and Enterobacteriaceae counts (ECs). The mean TVC for all species sampled by excision was 4.50 log CFU/cm(2), which was significantly higher than the 3.53 log CFU/cm(2) obtained by swabbing. The TVCs obtained using gauze and the cellulose and polyurethane sponges were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than the corresponding TVCs obtained using viscose sponges. Animal species, the person who collected the samples, and microbiological load also had a significant effect on TVC. ECs were obtained from 82.8% of excision samples, from larger percentages of samples obtained using cellulose or polyurethane sponges or gauze swabs, but from smaller percentages of samples obtained using viscose sponges. The Enterobacteriaceae load significantly influenced the EC. In contrast, animal species and the person who collected the samples had no significant effect. The cellulose sponge, polyurethane sponge, and gauze gave high mean log counts of aerobic bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae, which makes these swab types suitable for use in slaughterhouses for the purpose of assessing production process hygiene.
在西班牙东部的一家屠宰场,采集了 55 头牛、50 匹马、60 只羊和 50 头猪的尸体样本。每个尸体采集了两个样本,一个使用切除法,另一个使用擦拭法。擦拭法使用了四种不同的材料:纤维素、聚氨酯、粘胶海绵和医用纱布。在将尸体送往冷藏室之前,由四名不同的人员在处理结束时采集样本。对所有物种的样本进行总活菌计数(TVC)和肠杆菌科计数(EC)检测。所有物种通过切除法获得的平均 TVC 为 4.50 log CFU/cm(2),明显高于擦拭法获得的 3.53 log CFU/cm(2)。使用纱布和纤维素海绵以及聚氨酯海绵获得的 TVC 明显高于(P < 0.05)使用粘胶海绵获得的 TVC。动物物种、采集样本的人员和微生物负荷对 TVC 也有显著影响。从 82.8%的切除样本中获得了 EC,从使用纤维素或聚氨酯海绵或纱布拭子获得的样本中获得了更大比例的 EC,但从使用粘胶海绵获得的样本中获得了较小比例的 EC。肠杆菌科的负荷对 EC 有显著影响。相比之下,动物物种和采集样本的人员对其没有显著影响。纤维素海绵、聚氨酯海绵和纱布的需氧菌和肠杆菌科的平均对数计数较高,这使得这些拭子类型适合在屠宰场用于评估生产过程的卫生状况。