• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗抑郁药的效果与抑郁严重程度:患者水平的荟萃分析。

Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 3720 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2010 Jan 6;303(1):47-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1943.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2009.1943
PMID:20051569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3712503/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Antidepressant medications represent the best established treatment for major depressive disorder, but there is little evidence that they have a specific pharmacological effect relative to pill placebo for patients with less severe depression.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the relative benefit of medication vs placebo across a wide range of initial symptom severity in patients diagnosed with depression.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from January 1980 through March 2009, along with references from meta-analyses and reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the treatment of major or minor depressive disorder were selected. Studies were included if their authors provided the requisite original data, they comprised adult outpatients, they included a medication vs placebo comparison for at least 6 weeks, they did not exclude patients on the basis of a placebo washout period, and they used the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Data from 6 studies (718 patients) were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Individual patient-level data were obtained from study authors.

RESULTS

Medication vs placebo differences varied substantially as a function of baseline severity. Among patients with HDRS scores below 23, Cohen d effect sizes for the difference between medication and placebo were estimated to be less than 0.20 (a standard definition of a small effect). Estimates of the magnitude of the superiority of medication over placebo increased with increases in baseline depression severity and crossed the threshold defined by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence for a clinically significant difference at a baseline HDRS score of 25.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of benefit of antidepressant medication compared with placebo increases with severity of depression symptoms and may be minimal or nonexistent, on average, in patients with mild or moderate symptoms. For patients with very severe depression, the benefit of medications over placebo is substantial.

摘要

背景

抗抑郁药物是治疗重度抑郁症的最佳手段,但对于轻度抑郁患者,与服用安慰剂相比,它们在药理学上的效果几乎没有证据支持。

目的

评估药物治疗相对于轻度抑郁患者服用安慰剂的疗效差异在各种初始症状严重程度下的表现。

数据来源

从 1980 年 1 月至 2009 年 3 月,通过 PubMed、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane Library 数据库进行检索,同时检索了荟萃分析和综述的参考文献。

研究选择

选择了经美国食品和药物管理局批准的抗抑郁药物治疗重度或轻度抑郁障碍的随机安慰剂对照试验。如果研究作者提供了必要的原始数据,研究对象为成年门诊患者,包括至少 6 周的药物与安慰剂对照,没有根据安慰剂洗脱期排除患者,且使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS),则将其纳入研究。共纳入了 6 项研究(718 例患者)。

数据提取

从研究作者处获取了个体患者水平的数据。

结果

药物与安慰剂之间的差异与基线严重程度密切相关。在 HDRS 评分低于 23 的患者中,药物与安慰剂之间差异的 Cohen d 效应大小估计小于 0.20(一种小效应的标准定义)。随着基线抑郁严重程度的增加,药物优于安慰剂的估计值增加,并在基线 HDRS 评分为 25 时超过了国家临床卓越研究所定义的临床显著差异的阈值。

结论

与安慰剂相比,抗抑郁药物的益处大小随抑郁症状严重程度的增加而增加,在轻度或中度症状的患者中平均可能很小或不存在。对于重度抑郁患者,药物治疗相对于安慰剂的益处是显著的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f805/3712503/9f7e24e47a9b/nihms483345f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f805/3712503/e428ffcd5f60/nihms483345f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f805/3712503/9f7e24e47a9b/nihms483345f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f805/3712503/e428ffcd5f60/nihms483345f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f805/3712503/9f7e24e47a9b/nihms483345f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis.抗抑郁药的效果与抑郁严重程度:患者水平的荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2010 Jan 6;303(1):47-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1943.
2
Exploratory analyses of efficacy data from major depressive disorder trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration in support of new drug applications.探索性分析美国食品和药物管理局支持新药申请的主要抑郁症试验的疗效数据。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;72(4):464-72. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06191.
3
Can people with nonsevere major depression benefit from antidepressant medication?非重症抑郁症患者能从抗抑郁药物治疗中获益吗?
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;73(4):518-25. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06760. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
4
Pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression in adults.成人难治性抑郁症的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 17;12(12):CD010557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010557.pub2.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Vortioxetine for depression in adults.伏硫西汀用于成人抑郁症治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 5;7(7):CD011520. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011520.pub2.
7
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of major depressive disorder: an evidence-based analysis.重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2004;4(7):1-98. Epub 2004 Jun 1.
8
Comparative effectiveness of continuation and maintenance treatments for persistent depressive disorder in adults.成人持续性抑郁症延续治疗和维持治疗的比较效果
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 20;5(5):CD012855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012855.pub2.
9
Antidepressants for treating depression in dementia.用于治疗痴呆症患者抑郁症的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 31;8(8):CD003944. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003944.pub2.
10
[Use of antidepressant drugs in schizophrenic patients with depression].抗抑郁药物在伴有抑郁症状的精神分裂症患者中的应用
Encephale. 2006 Mar-Apr;32(2 Pt 1):263-9. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76153-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Nature-based interventions: a systematic review of reviews.基于自然的干预措施:综述的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 8;16:1625294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1625294. eCollection 2025.
2
Above the threshold, beyond the trip: the role of the 5-HT receptor in psychedelic-induced neuroplasticity and antidepressant effects.阈值之上,旅程之外:5-羟色胺受体在致幻剂诱导的神经可塑性和抗抑郁作用中的作用
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-03169-9.
3
Supplementation with porcine placenta extract reduces negative emotions and enhances positive emotions in healthy adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment and Prevention of Depression.抑郁症的治疗与预防。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2002 Nov;3(2):39-77. doi: 10.1111/1529-1006.00008. Epub 2002 Nov 1.
2
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fixed-dose desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/day for major depressive disorder in a placebo-controlled trial.在一项安慰剂对照试验中,每日服用50毫克和100毫克固定剂量去甲文拉法辛治疗重度抑郁症的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Sep;23(5):243-53. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32830cebed.
3
A pooled analysis of two placebo-controlled trials of desvenlafaxine in major depressive disorder.
补充猪胎盘提取物可减轻健康成年人的负面情绪并增强其正面情绪:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Front Nutr. 2025 Jul 23;12:1570736. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1570736. eCollection 2025.
4
Optimizing treatment for depression in primary care using psychotherapy versus antidepressant medication in a low-resource setting: protocol for the OptimizeD randomized controlled trial.在资源匮乏环境下使用心理治疗与抗抑郁药物优化初级保健中抑郁症的治疗:优化随机对照试验方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):744. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07030-9.
5
Role of baseline resting-state functional connectivity of the nucleus accumbens subregions in antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder.伏隔核亚区域的基线静息态功能连接在重度抑郁症抗抑郁治疗中的作用
Neuroimage Clin. 2025 Jul 8;48:103842. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103842.
6
Facial Emotion Recognition Trainings for Children and Adolescents: A Transdiagnostic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针对儿童和青少年的面部表情识别训练:一项跨诊断系统评价与荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 Jul-Aug;32(4):e70116. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70116.
7
Hypothetical interventional effect of health behaviors for improving depression symptoms among patients diagnosed with cancer: a g-formula based study.健康行为对改善癌症确诊患者抑郁症状的假设性干预效果:一项基于g公式的研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2259. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23511-8.
8
Rewiring Mood: Precision Psychobiotics as Adjunct or Stand-Alone Therapy in Depression Using Insights from 19 Randomized Controlled Trials in Adults.重塑情绪:精准精神益生菌作为成人抑郁症辅助或独立治疗方法——基于19项随机对照试验的见解
Nutrients. 2025 Jun 17;17(12):2022. doi: 10.3390/nu17122022.
9
Revisiting the SSRI vs. placebo debate in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: the role of expectancy effects, neural responsivity, and monoamine transporters.重新审视选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)与安慰剂在社交焦虑障碍治疗中的争论:预期效应、神经反应性和单胺转运体的作用。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 12;16:1531725. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1531725. eCollection 2025.
10
Predicting Placebo Responses Using EEG and Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: Correlations with Clinical Data Across Three Independent Datasets.使用脑电图和深度卷积神经网络预测安慰剂反应:与三个独立数据集的临床数据的相关性
Neuroinformatics. 2025 May 19;23(2):32. doi: 10.1007/s12021-025-09725-6.
一项对度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症的两项安慰剂对照试验的汇总分析。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jul;23(4):188-97. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32830263de.
4
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/day and 100 mg/day in outpatients with major depressive disorder.度洛西汀50毫克/天和100毫克/天治疗重度抑郁症门诊患者的疗效、安全性及耐受性
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Jul;24(7):1877-90. doi: 10.1185/03007990802161923. Epub 2008 May 27.
5
Reduced stress-sensitivity or increased reward experience: the psychological mechanism of response to antidepressant medication.应激敏感性降低或奖赏体验增加:对抗抑郁药物反应的心理机制。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Mar;34(4):923-31. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.66. Epub 2008 May 21.
6
Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration.初始严重程度与抗抑郁药疗效:对提交给美国食品药品监督管理局的数据进行的荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):e45. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045.
7
Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy.抗抑郁药物试验的选择性发表及其对表面疗效的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 17;358(3):252-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa065779.
8
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of desvenlafaxine succinate in adult outpatients with major depressive disorder.一项关于琥珀酸去甲文拉法辛治疗成年门诊重度抑郁症患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;68(11):1663-72. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n1105.
9
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of desvenlafaxine succinate in the treatment of major depressive disorder.一项关于琥珀酸去甲文拉法辛治疗重度抑郁症的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Nov;22(6):338-47. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3281e2c84b.
10
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine succinate in the treatment of major depressive disorder.一项关于琥珀酸去甲文拉法辛治疗重度抑郁症疗效和安全性的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 May;68(5):677-88. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n0504.