Septien-Velez Lucia, Pitrosky Bruno, Padmanabhan Sudharshan Krishna, Germain Jean-Michel, Tourian Karen A
Wyeth Research, Paris, France.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Nov;22(6):338-47. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3281e2c84b.
The antidepressant efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine succinate (desvenlafaxine) were evaluated in a phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Outpatients with a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder were treated with fixed once-daily doses of desvenlafaxine 200 or 400 mg for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. At the final on-therapy evaluation, adjusted mean change from baseline in 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score was greater for desvenlafaxine 200 and 400 mg/day vs. placebo. Both desvenlafaxine doses showed greater efficacy than placebo on the secondary efficacy measures, including the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale scores, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores, CGI-Severity, and 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression response rate. Desvenlafaxine 200 mg/day was also significantly better than placebo on remission, Visual Analog Scale-Pain Intensity overall scores, and some Visual Analog Scale-Pain Intensity subscale scores. Desvenlafaxine 400 mg/day was significantly better than placebo on selected Visual Analog Scale-Pain Intensity subscale scores. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity, and safety assessments revealed few clinically significant changes in vital signs, laboratory tests, and electrocardiogram results. These data provide support for the efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine in the treatment of major depressive disorder.
在一项III期双盲、安慰剂对照研究中评估了琥珀酸去甲文拉法辛(去甲文拉法辛)的抗抑郁疗效和安全性。主要诊断为重度抑郁症的门诊患者接受每日一次固定剂量200或400mg去甲文拉法辛治疗8周。主要疗效指标是17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表相对于基线的变化。在最终治疗评估时,200mg/天和400mg/天去甲文拉法辛组在17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表总分相对于基线的调整后平均变化大于安慰剂组。在次要疗效指标方面,包括临床总体印象改善量表评分、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表评分、临床总体印象严重程度以及17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表反应率,去甲文拉法辛的两个剂量组均显示出比安慰剂更高的疗效。200mg/天去甲文拉法辛在缓解率、视觉模拟评分-疼痛强度总体评分以及一些视觉模拟评分-疼痛强度子量表评分方面也显著优于安慰剂。400mg/天去甲文拉法辛在选定的视觉模拟评分-疼痛强度子量表评分方面显著优于安慰剂。大多数不良事件的严重程度为轻度或中度,安全性评估显示生命体征、实验室检查和心电图结果几乎没有临床显著变化。这些数据为去甲文拉法辛治疗重度抑郁症的疗效和安全性提供了支持。