Institute of Biology, Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2009;45(11):871-7.
The Oppel-Kundt illusion was examined in the psychophysical experiments with the classical two-part stimuli and modified three-part figures. The modified versions comprised either one filled medial interval and two empty flanking intervals or one empty space situated in between two fillings. The illusion was measured as a function of the number of filling elements in the referential parts of the figures. The curves obtained by two modified figures and by the original two-part stimulus were quite similar in shape, but the magnitudes of the illusions differed significantly. The figure with two filled intervals yielded about twice-stronger illusory effect than the contrasting figure with a single filled and two empty intervals. The two-part stimulus showed the illusion magnitudes in the midst. Our assumption suggests the illusory effect being related particularly to over estimations of the filled interval when compared with the empty interval displayed side-to-side. The unfilled interval might not contribute to the illusion.
奥佩尔-昆斯特错觉在使用经典的两部分刺激和修改后的三部分图形的心理物理实验中进行了研究。修改后的版本由一个填充的中间间隔和两个空的侧间隔组成,或者由两个填充之间的一个空的空间组成。错觉被测量为图形参考部分的填充元素数量的函数。两个修改后的图形和原始的两部分刺激获得的曲线形状非常相似,但错觉的大小差异很大。具有两个填充间隔的图形产生的错觉效果大约比具有单个填充和两个空间隔的对比图形强两倍。两部分刺激显示出中间的错觉大小。我们的假设表明,错觉效果特别与填充间隔相对于显示在两侧的空间隔的过度估计有关。未填充的间隔可能不会对错觉产生影响。