Bible Jesse E, Biswas Debdut, Miller Christopher P, Whang Peter G, Grauer Jonathan N
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, USA.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Feb;23(1):15-21. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181981632.
Prospective clinical study.
The purpose of this investigation was to quantify normal cervical range of motion (ROM) and compare these results to those used to perform 15 simulated activities of daily living (ADLs) in asymptomatic subjects.
Previous studies looking at cervical ROM during ADLs have been limited and used measuring devices that do not record continuous motion. The purpose of this investigation was to quantify normal cervical ROM and compare these results with those used to perform 15 simulated ADLs in asymptomatic subjects.
A noninvasive electrogoniometer and torsiometer were used to measure the ROM of the cervical spine. The accuracy and reliability of the devices were confirmed by comparing the ROM values acquired from dynamic flexion/extension and lateral bending radiographs to those provided by the device, which was activated while the radiographs were obtained. Intraobserver reliability was established by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient for repeated measurements on the same subjects by 1 investigator on consecutive days. These tools were employed in a clinical laboratory setting to evaluate the full active ROM of the cervical spines (ie, flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation) of 60 asymptomatic subjects (30 females and 30 males; age, 20 to 75 y) as well as to assess the functional ROM required to complete 15 simulated ADLs.
When compared with radiographic measurements, the electrogoniometer was found to be accurate within 2.3+/-2.2 degrees (mean+/-SD) and the intraobserver reliabilities for measuring the full active and functional ROM were both excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96 and 0.92, respectively). The absolute ROM and percentage of full active cervical spinal ROM used during the 15 ADLs was 13 to 32 degrees and 15% to 32% (median, 20 degrees/19%) for flexion/extension, 9 to 21 degrees and 11% to 27% (14 degrees/18%) for lateral bending, and 13 to 57 degrees and 12% to 92% (18 degrees/19%) for rotation. Backing up a car required the most ROM of all the ADLs, involving 32% of sagittal, 26% of lateral, and 92% of rotational motion. In general, personal hygiene ADLs such as washing hands and hair, shaving, and applying make-up entailed a significantly greater ROM relative to locomotive ADLs including walking and traveling up and down a set of stairs (P<0.0001); in addition, compared with climbing up these steps, significantly more sagittal and rotational motion was used when descending stairs (P=0.003 and P=0.016, respectively). When picking up an object from the ground, a squatting technique required a lower percentage of lateral and rotational ROM than bending at the waist (P=0.002 and P<0.0001).
By quantifying the amounts of cervical motion required to execute a series of simulated ADLs, this study indicates that most individuals use a relatively small percentage of their full active ROM when performing such activities. These findings provide baseline data which may allow clinicians to accurately assess preoperative impairment and postsurgical outcomes.
前瞻性临床研究。
本研究旨在量化正常颈椎活动范围(ROM),并将这些结果与无症状受试者进行15项模拟日常生活活动(ADL)时所使用的活动范围进行比较。
以往关于ADL期间颈椎ROM的研究有限,且使用的测量设备无法记录连续运动。本研究旨在量化正常颈椎ROM,并将这些结果与无症状受试者进行15项模拟ADL时所使用的活动范围进行比较。
使用非侵入式电子测角仪和扭转计测量颈椎的ROM。通过将动态屈伸和侧弯X线片获得的ROM值与设备在获取X线片时激活所提供的值进行比较,确认了设备的准确性和可靠性。通过计算一名研究者连续几天对同一受试者重复测量的组内相关系数,建立了观察者内信度。这些工具用于临床实验室环境,以评估60名无症状受试者(30名女性和30名男性;年龄20至75岁)颈椎的全主动ROM(即屈伸、侧弯和轴向旋转),并评估完成15项模拟ADL所需的功能ROM。
与X线测量相比,电子测角仪的测量精度在2.3±2.2度(均值±标准差)以内,测量全主动和功能ROM的观察者内信度均极佳(组内相关系数分别为0.96和0.92)。15项ADL期间使用的颈椎全主动ROM的绝对ROM和百分比,屈伸为13至32度和15%至32%(中位数,20度/19%),侧弯为9至21度和11%至27%(14度/18%),旋转为13至57度和12%至92%(18度/19%)。倒车在所有ADL中需要的ROM最多,涉及矢状面运动的32%、侧面运动的26%和旋转运动的92%。一般来说,诸如洗手、洗头、剃须和化妆等个人卫生ADL相对于包括行走和上下楼梯在内的移动ADL需要显著更大的ROM(P<0.0001);此外,与上楼梯相比,下楼梯时使用的矢状面和旋转运动明显更多(分别为P=0.003和P=0.016)。从地面捡起物体时,蹲姿技术所需的侧面和旋转ROM百分比低于弯腰(分别为P=0.002和P<0.0001)。
通过量化执行一系列模拟ADL所需的颈椎运动量,本研究表明大多数个体在进行此类活动时使用的全主动ROM百分比相对较小。这些发现提供了基线数据,可使临床医生准确评估术前损伤和术后结果。