• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

椎间盘置换术后颈椎节段运动分析。

Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 E. 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 15;35(8):E285-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c88165.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c88165
PMID:20354472
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of patients enrolled in a prospective randomized Food and Drug Administration trial with single level cervical disc replacement (CDR) with the ProDisc-C (Synthes, Paoli, PA).

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the segmental range of motion (ROM) in the cervical spine pre- and postoperative after CDR.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Each cervical level is believed to have its own biomechanical characteristics, ultimately leading to different sagittal and lateral ROM. Our understanding of the factors that influence motion after CDR continues to change and expand.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-four patients with single level ProDisc-C arthroplasty were evaluated radiographically using Medical Metrics (QMATM, Medical Metrics, Inc., Houston, TX). Pre- and postoperative disc height and ROM were measured from standing lateral and flexion-extension radiographs. Of these 164 patients, 44 had a CDR at C6/C7, 96 at C5/C6, 18 at C4/C5, and 6 at C3/C4. The mean follow-up was of 24 months. Statistical analysis evaluated the difference in mean ROM between the groups.

RESULTS

Before surgery, C4/C5 had more sagittal ROM compared with C3/C4, C5/C6, and C6/C7 (P < 0.001.) Before surgery, C4/C5 also had more lateral ROM compared with C3/C4, C5/C6, and C6/C7 (P = 0.015). After surgery, there were no significant differences in sagittal and lateral ROM between C3/C4, C4/C5, C5/C6, and C6/C7. The delta (difference between pre- and postoperative) proved that the C4/C5 CDR actually lost sagittal ROM (-2.5 degrees ) compared with the other levels, which gained sagittal ROM, C3/C4 (0.9 degrees ), C5/C6 (1.8 degrees ), and C6/C7 (1.6 degrees ); P = 0.037. There was no significant difference in the delta lateral ROM between the segments: C3/C4, C4/C5, C5/C6, and C6/C7.

CONCLUSION

CDR approximates the different segmental sagittal and lateral ROM. Although C4/C5 had negative delta ROM in the sagittal and lateral planes, it provided a satisfactory final ROM. Long-term clinical outcome studies are needed to properly evaluate if these differences could ultimately affect the patients everyday life.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性研究前瞻性随机食品和药物管理局试验中接受单节段颈椎间盘置换术(CDR)的患者,使用 ProDisc-C(Synthes,宾夕法尼亚州波利)。

目的

评估 CDR 前后颈椎的节段活动范围(ROM)。

背景信息摘要

每个颈椎水平都被认为具有自己的生物力学特性,最终导致矢状面和侧面 ROM 不同。我们对影响 CDR 后运动的因素的理解还在不断变化和扩展。

方法

使用 Medical Metrics(QMATM,Medical Metrics,Inc.,休斯顿,TX)对 164 例接受单节段 ProDisc-C 关节置换术的患者进行影像学评估。从站立侧位和屈伸位 X 线片测量术前和术后的椎间盘高度和 ROM。在这 164 例患者中,44 例在 C6/C7 行 CDR,96 例在 C5/C6 行 CDR,18 例在 C4/C5 行 CDR,6 例在 C3/C4 行 CDR。平均随访时间为 24 个月。统计分析评估了各组间 ROM 平均值的差异。

结果

术前,C4/C5 的矢状面 ROM 大于 C3/C4、C5/C6 和 C6/C7(P < 0.001)。术前,C4/C5 的侧方 ROM 也大于 C3/C4、C5/C6 和 C6/C7(P = 0.015)。术后,C3/C4、C4/C5、C5/C6 和 C6/C7 之间的矢状面和侧方 ROM 无显著差异。差值(术前与术后差值)表明 C4/C5 CDR 实际上比其他节段丧失了矢状面 ROM(-2.5 度),而 C3/C4、C5/C6 和 C6/C7 则增加了矢状面 ROM(分别为 0.9 度、1.8 度和 1.6 度);P = 0.037。节段间的差值侧 ROM 无显著差异:C3/C4、C4/C5、C5/C6 和 C6/C7。

结论

CDR 接近不同节段的矢状面和侧面 ROM。尽管 C4/C5 在矢状面和冠状面的差值 ROM 为负,但它提供了满意的终末 ROM。需要进行长期的临床结果研究,以正确评估这些差异是否最终会影响患者的日常生活。

相似文献

1
Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.椎间盘置换术后颈椎节段运动分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 15;35(8):E285-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c88165.
2
Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.融合术和Bryan人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778.
3
[LOCATION CHANGE OF ROTATION CENTER AFTER SINGLE SEGMENTAL CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT WITH ProDisc-C].[使用ProDisc-C进行单节段颈椎间盘置换术后旋转中心的位置变化]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jan;29(1):48-53.
4
Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.双节段全椎间盘置换对颈椎运动学的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):E794-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181afe4bb.
5
Changes in cervical range of motion and sagittal alignment in early and late phases after total disc replacement: radiographic follow-up exceeding 2 years.全椎间盘置换术后早期和晚期颈椎活动度和矢状位平衡的变化:超过 2 年的放射学随访。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Dec;11(6):688-95. doi: 10.3171/2009.7.SPINE0946.
6
Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.单节段和双节段颈椎置换与融合术的生物力学比较:对邻近节段脊柱运动学的影响。
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.006.
7
Correlation of radiostereometric measured cervical range of motion with clinical radiographic findings after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后放射立体测量的颈椎活动度与临床影像学结果的相关性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 1;34(7):680-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819819a0.
8
Comparison of Cobb technique, quantitative motion analysis, and radiostereometric analysis in measurement of segmental range of motions after lumbar total disc arthroplasty.腰椎全椎间盘置换术后节段活动度测量中Cobb技术、定量运动分析和放射立体测量分析的比较。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Dec;22(8):602-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318198791e.
9
Anterior transvertebral herniotomy for cervical disc herniation: a long-term follow-up study.颈椎间盘突出症的前路经椎间隙疝修补术:一项长期随访研究。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Aug;22(6):408-12. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31818cd428.
10
Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.人工关节设计对颈椎运动学的影响:Bryan 椎间盘、ProDisc-C 和 Synergy 椎间盘的分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Jun;28(6):E6. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1058.

引用本文的文献

1
Three dimensional-printed artificial disc replacement for single-level cervical spondylosis: a cohort study.三维打印人工椎间盘置换治疗单节段颈椎病:一项队列研究。
Int Orthop. 2025 Jan;49(1):195-202. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06328-9. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
2
Effect of Facet Tropism on Postoperative Cervical Range of Motion After Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.关节突关节不对称对单节段颈椎间盘置换术后颈椎活动度的影响。
Global Spine J. 2022 Oct;12(8):1696-1707. doi: 10.1177/2192568220986144. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
3
Effect of preoperative segmental range of motion on patient outcomes in cervical disc arthroplasty.
术前节段活动度对颈椎间盘置换术患者预后的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jul 13;21(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03419-7.
4
Placing ball and socket cervical total disc replacement using instant center of rotation.采用即时旋转中心放置球窝型颈椎全椎间盘置换物。
J Orthop. 2019 May 1;16(5):390-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.04.005. eCollection 2019 Sep-Oct.
5
[Effectiveness evaluation of Prodisc-C prosthesis for more than 10 years follow-up after total cervical disc replacement].[全颈椎间盘置换术后使用Prodisc-C假体超过10年随访的疗效评估]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 15;33(4):393-402. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201810109.
6
Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment.颈椎人工椎间盘置换术与颈椎融合术治疗颈椎间盘退变疾病的卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Feb 19;19(3):1-223. eCollection 2019.
7
[Early effectiveness of cervical disc replacement by using Pretic-I].[使用Pretic-I进行颈椎间盘置换的早期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 15;31(5):513-518. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201612146.
8
Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?椎间盘置换术中的颈椎对线:我们是否应该改变观点?
Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24 Suppl 7:810-25. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4258-6. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
9
Polyurethane on titanium unconstrained disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc disease: a review of level I-II randomized clinical trials including clinical outcomes.钛制非约束性聚氨酯椎间盘置换术与前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗颈椎间盘疾病:一项包括临床结果的I-II级随机临床试验综述
Eur Spine J. 2015 Dec;24(12):2735-45. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4228-z. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
10
Factors that may affect outcome in cervical artificial disc replacement: a systematic review.可能影响颈椎人工椎间盘置换术预后的因素:一项系统评价
Eur Spine J. 2015 Sep;24(9):2023-32. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4096-6. Epub 2015 Jul 9.