Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Jan 5;4(1):e575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000575.
The origin of syphilis is still controversial. Different research avenues explore its fascinating history. Here we employed a new integrative approach, where paleopathology and molecular analyses are combined. As an exercise to test the validity of this approach we examined different hypotheses on the origin of syphilis and other human diseases caused by treponemes (treponematoses). Initially, we constructed a worldwide map containing all accessible reports on palaeopathological evidences of treponematoses before Columbus's return to Europe. Then, we selected the oldest ones to calibrate the time of the most recent common ancestor of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum, T. pallidum subsp. endemicum and T. pallidum subsp. pertenue in phylogenetic analyses with 21 genetic regions of different T. pallidum strains previously reported. Finally, we estimated the treponemes' evolutionary rate to test three scenarios: A) if treponematoses accompanied human evolution since Homo erectus; B) if venereal syphilis arose very recently from less virulent strains caught in the New World about 500 years ago, and C) if it emerged in the Americas between 16,500 and 5,000 years ago. Two of the resulting evolutionary rates were unlikely and do not explain the existent osseous evidence. Thus, treponematoses, as we know them today, did not emerge with H. erectus, nor did venereal syphilis appear only five centuries ago. However, considering 16,500 years before present (yBP) as the time of the first colonization of the Americas, and approximately 5,000 yBP as the oldest probable evidence of venereal syphilis in the world, we could not entirely reject hypothesis C. We confirm that syphilis seems to have emerged in this time span, since the resulting evolutionary rate is compatible with those observed in other bacteria. In contrast, if the claims of precolumbian venereal syphilis outside the Americas are taken into account, the place of origin remains unsolved. Finally, the endeavor of joining paleopathology and phylogenetics proved to be a fruitful and promising approach for the study of infectious diseases.
梅毒的起源仍存在争议。不同的研究途径探索了其迷人的历史。在这里,我们采用了一种新的综合方法,将古病理学和分子分析相结合。作为检验这种方法有效性的一种手段,我们检验了关于梅毒和其他由密螺旋体引起的人类疾病(密螺旋体病)起源的不同假设。首先,我们构建了一个包含哥伦布返回欧洲之前所有可获得的有关密螺旋体病古病理学证据的全球地图。然后,我们选择最古老的证据来校准苍白密螺旋体亚种、地方性密螺旋体亚种和苍白密螺旋体亚种的最近共同祖先的时间,在对以前报道的 21 个苍白密螺旋体菌株的不同基因区域进行系统发育分析时。最后,我们估计了密螺旋体的进化率,以检验三个假设:A)如果密螺旋体病自直立人以来就伴随着人类进化;B)如果性病梅毒是最近从大约 500 年前新大陆的低毒菌株中产生的,以及 C)如果它是在美洲出现的,时间在 16500 到 5000 年前之间。两种结果中的进化率都不太可能,也不能解释现存的骨骼证据。因此,就我们今天所知,密螺旋体病并不是与直立人一起出现的,性病梅毒也不是仅仅在五百年前才出现的。然而,考虑到美洲的第一次殖民化时间是 16500 年前(BP),而世界上最早的性病梅毒证据大约是 5000 年前,我们不能完全排除假设 C。我们证实,梅毒似乎是在这个时间范围内出现的,因为由此产生的进化率与其他细菌中观察到的进化率是一致的。相比之下,如果考虑到在美洲以外地区有哥伦布前性病梅毒的说法,那么起源地仍然没有定论。最后,古病理学和系统发育学的结合证明是一种研究传染病的富有成效和有前途的方法。