计算机辅助脊柱椎弓根螺钉置钉的功能结果:包含 5992 枚椎弓根螺钉的 23 项研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5,992 pedicle screws.
机构信息
Trauma and Orthopaedics, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Lindley, Huddersfield HD33EA, UK.
出版信息
Eur Spine J. 2010 Mar;19(3):370-5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1258-4. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
A number of studies have shown increased accuracy of pedicle screw placement in spine with the help of computer-assisted navigation. The literature is lacking in regard to functional benefit derived from this technique. The aim of this systematic review was to look at the functional outcomes following computer-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine. A 'Dialog Datastar' search was used using optimized search strategy covering the period from 1950 to July 2009; 23 papers were finally included which met our inclusion criteria. We report on a total of 1,288 patients with 5,992 pedicle screws. The comparison of neurological complications in two groups demonstrated an odds ratio of 0.25 (95% CI 0.06, 1.14) in favour of using navigation for pedicle screw insertion (p = 0.07). Comparative trials demonstrated a significant advantage in terms of accuracy of navigation over conventional pedicle screw insertion with a relative risk of 1.12 (95% CI 1.09, 1.15) (p < 0.00001). Navigation does not show statistically significant benefit in reducing neurological complications and there was insufficient data in the literature to infer a conclusion in terms of fusion rate, pain relief and health outcome scores.
许多研究表明,计算机辅助导航有助于提高脊柱椎弓根螺钉的定位准确性。然而,关于该技术带来的功能益处,文献中还存在空白。本系统评价的目的是观察脊柱计算机辅助椎弓根螺钉置入后的功能结果。使用“Dialog Datastar”进行了检索,使用了优化的搜索策略,涵盖了 1950 年至 2009 年 7 月的时间段;最终纳入了 23 篇符合我们纳入标准的文献。我们报告了总共 1288 例患者的 5992 枚椎弓根螺钉。两组神经并发症的比较显示,导航组椎弓根螺钉置入的优势比为 0.25(95%可信区间 0.06,1.14)(p = 0.07)。对比试验表明,导航在准确性方面明显优于传统椎弓根螺钉置入,相对风险为 1.12(95%可信区间 1.09,1.15)(p < 0.00001)。导航在减少神经并发症方面没有显示出统计学上的显著益处,而且文献中数据不足,无法就融合率、疼痛缓解和健康结果评分得出结论。