Zénon Alexandre, Ben Hamed Suliann, Duhamel Jean-René, Olivier Etienne
Laboratory of Neurophysiology, Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
J Vis. 2009 Oct 8;9(11):9.1-15. doi: 10.1167/9.11.9.
The time needed to search for an object in a complex environment increases with the number of distracting stimuli, a phenomenon known as the "set-size effect." This observation has led to the view that, during visual search, several attentional shifts are performed, suggesting that visual information is processed serially. In an attempt to find direct evidence for such attentional shifts, we implemented several dual tasks combining a covert visual search (CVS) task or a cued target detection task with a character reporting task which allowed us to determine, a posteriori, the attentional allocation. We found that, in the cueing task, subjects preferentially reported characters displayed at different locations, demonstrating that the attention spotlight actually shifted in this condition. In contrast, in both feature and conjunction CVS, subjects predominantly reported several characters flashed at the same location, whatever the delay between their presentations, indicating that, despite a clear "set-size effect," attention remained static. These results demonstrate that CVS can be performed without shifting attention and that the "set-size effect" does not necessarily attest that visual information is processed serially. The present study therefore supports the hypothesis that parallel mechanisms are involved in visual information processing during visual search, in agreement with previous theoretical studies.
在复杂环境中寻找物体所需的时间会随着干扰刺激的数量增加而延长,这一现象被称为“集合大小效应”。这一观察结果导致了这样一种观点,即在视觉搜索过程中会进行多次注意力转移,这表明视觉信息是串行处理的。为了找到这种注意力转移的直接证据,我们实施了几个双重任务,将隐蔽视觉搜索(CVS)任务或线索目标检测任务与一个字符报告任务相结合,这使我们能够事后确定注意力分配情况。我们发现,在线索任务中,受试者优先报告显示在不同位置的字符,这表明在这种情况下注意力焦点实际上发生了转移。相比之下,在特征和联合CVS任务中,无论字符呈现之间的延迟如何,受试者主要报告在同一位置闪烁的几个字符,这表明尽管存在明显的“集合大小效应”,注意力仍保持静止。这些结果表明,CVS任务可以在不转移注意力的情况下完成,并且“集合大小效应”不一定证明视觉信息是串行处理的。因此,本研究支持这样一种假设,即在视觉搜索过程中,并行机制参与了视觉信息处理,这与之前的理论研究一致。