• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烟草筛查多组分质量改进网络计划:超越教育。

Tobacco screening multicomponent quality improvement network program: beyond education.

机构信息

Health Studies Research Division, Department of Medicine, Lehigh Valley Hospital and Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;16(11):1186-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00551.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00551.x
PMID:20053239
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Due to the addictive nature of the disease and interrelated societal influences on the behavior of tobacco use, repeated interventions are often required before people successfully stop using tobacco. Our objective was to implement a multicomponent clinical intervention initiative enabling health care providers to effectively screen for tobacco use. We also sought to describe changes in emergency medicine providers' documentation of cessation advice to tobacco users.

METHODS

The intervention was conducted at three emergency departments (EDs) and four clinics at a community-based teaching hospital and health network. Health care providers with the opportunity to identify and counsel tobacco-using patients in ambulatory health care settings were the study population. The authors initiated a quality improvement initiative for tobacco screening that employed a multicomponent strategy to facilitate systemic changes that support 100% tobacco use identification, documentation, and counseling. Baseline, posteducation, and post-wrap-around documented screening rates were compared within each site across the intervention. Cumulative ED baseline, posteducation, and post-wrap-around rates of provider advice to tobacco users were compared across the intervention. Percentage of possible available gain was calculated in consideration of a 100% ceiling effect. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS and MetStat. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's chi-square cell frequency were used to analyze and compare sites. Fisher's exact test was used to compare those tests with a chi-square cell frequency of five or less. The statistical tests used for pre-/postintervention percentage comparisons by site had power between 80% and 90%, detecting differences of 10% and 20% or more at a 0.05 level of significance.

RESULTS

Significant increases in posteducation screening rates for all ED sites complemented significant increases in ED post-wrap-around intervention screening rates. Significant increases in ED provider documented cessation advice were also noted.

CONCLUSIONS

This initiative successfully changed tobacco screening behavior of health care providers at all sites. It was particularly successful in the ED, typically an environment less likely to be conducive to preventive health interventions.

摘要

目的

由于疾病的成瘾性和社会因素对烟草使用行为的相互影响,人们通常需要多次干预才能成功戒烟。我们的目标是实施一项多组分临床干预措施,使医疗保健提供者能够有效地对烟草使用进行筛查。我们还试图描述急诊医学提供者对烟草使用者戒烟建议的记录变化。

方法

该干预措施在一家社区教学医院和医疗网络的三个急诊部(ED)和四个诊所进行。有机会在门诊保健环境中识别和劝导烟草使用者的医疗保健提供者是研究对象。作者发起了一项烟草筛查质量改进倡议,采用多组分策略促进系统变革,以支持 100%的烟草使用识别、记录和咨询。在整个干预过程中,比较了每个地点的基线、教育后和 wrap-around 后的筛查率。比较了整个干预过程中 ED 基线、教育后和 wrap-around 后提供者对烟草使用者建议的累积率。考虑到 100%的上限效应,计算了可能获得的百分比。使用 SPSS 和 MetStat 进行统计分析。使用描述性统计和 Pearson 卡方单元格频率分析和比较站点。对于卡方单元格频率为五或更少的测试,使用 Fisher 精确检验。使用每个站点的预/后干预百分比比较的统计检验具有 80%至 90%的功效,可在 0.05 水平上检测到 10%和 20%或更多的差异。

结果

所有 ED 站点的教育后筛查率显著增加,同时 ED wrap-around 干预后的筛查率也显著增加。ED 提供者记录的戒烟建议也显著增加。

结论

该倡议成功改变了所有站点医疗保健提供者的烟草筛查行为。它在 ED 中特别成功,ED 通常不太利于进行预防性健康干预。

相似文献

1
Tobacco screening multicomponent quality improvement network program: beyond education.烟草筛查多组分质量改进网络计划:超越教育。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;16(11):1186-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00551.x.
2
Tobacco control interventions in the emergency department: a joint statement of emergency medicine organizations.急诊科的烟草控制干预措施:急诊医学组织联合声明
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;48(4):e417-26. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.02.018. Epub 2006 Jun 8.
3
Emergency department tobacco cessation program: staff participation and intervention success among patients.急诊科戒烟项目:工作人员参与情况及患者干预成效
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008 Aug;108(8):391-6.
4
Increasing the screening and counseling of adolescents for risky health behaviors: a primary care intervention.加强对青少年危险健康行为的筛查和咨询:一项初级保健干预措施。
Pediatrics. 2005 Apr;115(4):960-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0520.
5
Measuring provider adherence to tobacco treatment guidelines: a comparison of electronic medical record review, patient survey, and provider survey.衡量医疗服务提供者对烟草治疗指南的遵循情况:电子病历审查、患者调查和医疗服务提供者调查的比较
Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Apr;7 Suppl 1:S35-43. doi: 10.1080/14622200500078089.
6
Training health care providers in the treatment of tobacco use and dependence: pre- and post-training results.对医疗保健提供者进行烟草使用与依赖治疗方面的培训:培训前后的结果。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Aug;15(4):607-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01058.x.
7
Motivation for stopping tobacco use among emergency department patients.急诊科患者戒烟的动机。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jun;12(6):568-71. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.11.027.
8
"Should I give you my smoking lecture now or later?" Characterizing emergency physician smoking discussions and cessation counseling.“我该现在还是稍后给你上我的吸烟课呢?”急诊医生吸烟讨论与戒烟咨询的特征分析
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;48(4):406-14, 414.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.037. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
9
Implementation of a smoking cessation counseling module in a preceptorship program.在临床带教计划中实施戒烟咨询模块。
Fam Med. 2005 Feb;37(2):105-11.
10
Community mental healthcare providers' attitudes and practices related to smoking cessation interventions for people living with severe mental illness.社区精神卫生保健提供者与严重精神疾病患者戒烟干预相关的态度和实践。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Nov;77(2):289-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Physician-directed smoking cessation using patient "opt-out" approach in the emergency department: A pilot program.在急诊科采用患者“选择退出”方式由医生主导的戒烟:一项试点项目。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Jul 6;1(5):782-789. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12176. eCollection 2020 Oct.