Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Int J Cardiol. 2011 May 19;149(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.11.039. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
Pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting with a first cardiac event (FCE) can be different from patients with a recurring cardiac event (RCE). We assessed inflammatory activation and circulating progenitor cells' (CPC) mobilisation in patients with a FCE versus those with RCE.
We recruited 41 patients: 18 with FCE and 23 with RCE. Peripheral blood samples were drawn at baseline and at 20 days to measure high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) and to assess CD34+/133+ CPC and CD34+/KDR+ CPC by flow cytometry.
CD34+/133+ cells (% number of cells per total number of cytometric events) were similar at baseline, being 0.25% (0.17-0.42%) in the FCE vs 0.23% (0.11-0.43%) in the RCE group, and increased at follow-up only in the FCE group to 0.41% (0.22-0.64%), while in the RCE group they were 0.27% (0.11-0.36%) (p=0.009 for the interaction, p=0.07 for the main effect of time). CD34+/KDR+ cells were similar at baseline in the two groups, did not significantly increase over time (p=0.2), and no differential effect of FCE vs RCE over time was seen (p=0.38). CRP levels, similar at baseline, were consistently reduced at 20 days after ACS (p=0.001), with no differential effect of FCE vs RCE pts (p=0.74). Variation from baseline to follow-up for both CD34+/133+ and CD34+/KDR+ did not correlate with either baseline CRP or delta CRP.
Our data demonstrate a differential CPC mobilization behavior for FCE patients compared to RCE ones, independent of inflammatory activation.
首次发生心脏事件(FCE)的患者与再次发生心脏事件(RCE)的患者的急性冠脉综合征病理生理学可能不同。我们评估了 FCE 患者与 RCE 患者的炎症激活和循环祖细胞(CPC)动员情况。
我们招募了 41 名患者:18 名 FCE 患者和 23 名 RCE 患者。在基线和 20 天时采集外周血样,以测量高敏 C 反应蛋白(CRP),并通过流式细胞术评估 CD34+/133+CPC 和 CD34+/KDR+CPC。
CD34+/133+细胞(每个细胞总数的百分比)在基线时相似,FCE 组为 0.25%(0.17-0.42%),RCE 组为 0.23%(0.11-0.43%),仅在 FCE 组在随访时增加到 0.41%(0.22-0.64%),而在 RCE 组为 0.27%(0.11-0.36%)(时间交互作用的 p=0.009,时间主效应的 p=0.07)。两组基线时 CD34+/KDR+细胞相似,随时间无明显增加(p=0.2),且未观察到 FCE 与 RCE 之间的时间差异效应(p=0.38)。基线时 CRP 水平相似,ACS 后 20 天持续降低(p=0.001),FCE 与 RCE 患者无差异(p=0.74)。CD34+/133+和 CD34+/KDR+从基线到随访的变化与基线 CRP 或 delta CRP 均无相关性。
我们的数据表明,与 RCE 患者相比,FCE 患者的 CPC 动员行为存在差异,而与炎症激活无关。