Porto Italo, Di Vito Luca, De Maria Giovanni Luigi, Dato Ilaria, Tritarelli Alessandra, Leone Antonio Maria, Niccoli Giampaolo, Capogrossi Maurizio C, Biasucci Luigi Marzio, Crea Filippo
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jun 1;103(11):1500-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.370.
To compare the anti-inflammatory and endothelial progenitor cell mobilizing effects of ramipril and telmisartan in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), 42 patients with ACS were randomized after successful percutaneous coronary intervention to ramipril 5 mg/day (22 patients) or telmisartan 80 mg/day (20 patients). Peripheral blood samples were drawn at baseline and at 20 days to measure high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and to assess 4 populations of progenitor cells by flow cytometry, namely CD34+/KDR+, CD34+/CD133+, CD34+/CD133+/CD45-, and CD34+/KDR+/CD45- cells. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, similar in the 2 groups at baseline, were significantly more decreased by telmisartan than by ramipril at follow up (p = 0.013 for time-by-drug interaction). The main effect for time was also significant (p <0.001). CD34+/KDR+ and CD34+/CD133+ cells were similar at baseline and did not change over time (p = 0.2 and p = 0.1, respectively). In contrast, for CD34+/KDR+/CD45- and CD34+/CD133+/CD45- cells, a significant increase with time was seen (p = 0.02 and p = 0.002, respectively) and no differential effect of either drug was seen. In conclusion, telmisartan shows a more potent anti-inflammatory effect than ramipril after an ACS. The 2 drugs do not show a differential effect on endothelial progenitor cell mobilization.
为比较雷米普利和替米沙坦对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的抗炎及内皮祖细胞动员作用,42例ACS患者在成功进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,随机分为雷米普利组(22例,5mg/天)和替米沙坦组(20例,80mg/天)。在基线和第20天时采集外周血样本,检测高敏C反应蛋白,并通过流式细胞术评估4种祖细胞群体,即CD34+/KDR+、CD34+/CD133+、CD34+/CD133+/CD45-和CD34+/KDR+/CD45-细胞。两组基线时高敏C反应蛋白水平相似,随访时替米沙坦使该水平的降低幅度显著大于雷米普利(时间-药物交互作用p = 0.013)。时间的主效应也显著(p <0.001)。CD34+/KDR+和CD34+/CD133+细胞在基线时相似,且随时间无变化(分别为p = 0.2和p = 0.1)。相反,对于CD34+/KDR+/CD45-和CD34+/CD133+/CD45-细胞,随时间显著增加(分别为p = 0.02和p = 0.002),且未观察到两种药物的差异效应。总之,ACS后替米沙坦比雷米普利具有更强的抗炎作用。两种药物在内皮祖细胞动员方面未显示出差异效应。