Department of Anatomy and Morphology, V.L. Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 194376, Russia.
Ann Bot. 2010 Mar;105(3):349-54. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp302. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
Models of nectar formation and exudation in multilayered nectaries with modified stomata or permeable cuticle are evaluated. In the current symplasmic model the pre-nectar moves from terminal phloem through the symplasm into the apoplasm (cell walls and intercellular spaces) with nectar formation by either granulocrine or eccrine secretion and its diffusion outwards. It is concluded, however, that no secretory granules are actually produced by the endoplasmic reticulum, and that secretory Golgi vesicles are not involved in the transport of nectar sugar. Therefore, the concept of granulocrine secretion of nectar should be discarded. The specific function of the endomembrane system in nectary cells remains unknown. According to the apoplasmic model, the pre-nectar moves from the terminal phloem in the apoplasm and, on the way, is transformed from phloem sap into nectar. However, viewed ultrastructurally, the unloading (terminal) phloem of nectaries appears to be less active than that of the leaf minor veins, and is therefore not actively involved in the secretion of pre-nectar components into the apoplasm. This invalidates the apoplasmic model. Neither model provides an explanation for the origin of the driving force for nectar discharge.
A new model is proposed in which nectar moves by a pressure-driven mass flow in the nectary apoplasm while pre-nectar sugars diffuse from the sieve tubes through the symplasm to the secretory cells, where nectar is formed and sugars cross the plasma membrane by active transport ('eccrine secretion'). The pressure originates as the result of water influx in the apoplasm from the symplasm along the sugar concentration gradient. It follows from this model that there can be no combinations of apoplasmic and symplasmic pre-nectar movements. The mass-flow mechanism of nectar exudation appears to be universal and applicable to all nectaries irrespective of their type, morphology and anatomy, presence or absence of modified stomata, and their own vascular system.
评估了具有改良气孔或可渗透角质层的多层蜜腺中花蜜形成和渗出的模型。在当前的共质体模型中,花蜜前体通过共质体从末端韧皮部移动到质外体(细胞壁和细胞间隙),通过粒腺体或外分泌分泌形成花蜜,并向外扩散。然而,结论是内质网实际上没有产生分泌颗粒,分泌高尔基体小泡也没有参与花蜜糖的运输。因此,粒腺体分泌花蜜的概念应该被摒弃。内膜系统在蜜腺细胞中的特定功能仍然未知。根据质外体模型,花蜜前体在质外体中从末端韧皮部移动,在此过程中,从韧皮部汁液转化为花蜜。然而,从超微结构上看,蜜腺的卸载(末端)韧皮部似乎不如叶片小脉活跃,因此没有积极参与将花蜜前体成分分泌到质外体中。这使质外体模型无效。这两个模型都没有解释花蜜排出的驱动力的起源。
提出了一个新的模型,其中花蜜通过蜜腺质外体中的压力驱动质量流移动,而花蜜前体糖通过共质体从筛管扩散到分泌细胞,在那里形成花蜜,糖通过主动运输穿过质膜(外分泌分泌)。压力源于质外体中沿糖浓度梯度从共质体流入的水。从这个模型可以得出结论,质外体和共质体的花蜜前体运动不可能结合在一起。花蜜渗出的质量流机制似乎是普遍的,适用于所有蜜腺,无论其类型、形态和解剖结构、是否存在改良的气孔以及自身的血管系统如何。