Koskinen Heli I, Snellman Marjatta
Department of Social Psychology, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box. 54, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.
J Vet Med Educ. 2009 Winter;36(4):418-22. doi: 10.3138/jvme.36.4.418.
In the evaluation of the clinical competence of veterinary students, many different definitions and methods are approved. Due to the increasing discussion of the quality of outcomes produced by newly graduated veterinarians, methods for the evaluation of clinical competencies should also be evaluated. In this study, this was done by comparing two qualitative evaluation schemes: the well-known structure of observed learning outcome (SOLO) taxonomy and a modification of this taxonomy. A case-based final radiologic examination was selected and the investigation was performed by classifying students' outcomes. These classes were finally put next to original (quantitative) scores and the statistical calculations were initiated. Significant correlations between taxonomies (0.53) and the modified taxonomy and original scores (0.66) were found and some qualitative similarities between evaluation methods were observed. In addition, some supplements were recommended for the structure of evaluation schemes, especially for the structure of the modified SOLO taxonomy.
在评估兽医专业学生的临床能力时,许多不同的定义和方法得到认可。由于对新毕业兽医所产生结果的质量讨论日益增多,临床能力评估方法也应得到评估。在本研究中,通过比较两种定性评估方案来实现这一点:著名的观察学习成果(SOLO)分类法结构及其一种修改形式。选择了基于病例的最终放射学检查,并通过对学生的结果进行分类来开展调查。这些类别最终与原始(定量)分数并列,并开始进行统计计算。发现分类法之间存在显著相关性(0.53),修改后的分类法与原始分数之间也存在显著相关性(0.66),并且观察到评估方法之间存在一些定性相似之处。此外,还针对评估方案的结构,特别是修改后的SOLO分类法结构,提出了一些补充建议。