• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回肠袢式造口关闭术后的管理:我们让患者住院时间过长了吗?

Postoperative management after loop ileostomy closure: are we keeping patients in hospital too long?

作者信息

Baraza W, Wild J, Barber W, Brown S

机构信息

Department of Surgical and Anaesthetic Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Jan;92(1):51-5. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12518836439209.

DOI:10.1308/003588410X12518836439209
PMID:20056062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3024618/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have shown that closure of loop ileostomy can be performed in the day-case setting, reducing the length and cost of hospitalisation. By analysing our patients who have undergone reversal, we aimed to determine the length of hospital stay and potential factors behind stays beyond 24 h.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A database of patients undergoing closure of loop ileostomy at one colorectal unit was examined. The times taken to discharge, morbidity and re-admission rates were recorded.

RESULTS

Eighty patients underwent reversal of ileostomy between January 2001 and January 2006. Median age was 63 years (range, 22-81 years). The median length of stay was 4 days (range, 2-32 days). The median length of stay in patients without complications was 4 days. Many appeared able to be discharged earlier. Seventy-two patients (90%) were able to tolerate a solid diet within 48 h and 54 (67.5%) had bowel function within 3 days. Six patients went home before bowel function; none of these were re-admitted. Twenty patients (25%) developed complications, which included wound infection (8%), small bowel obstruction/ileus (6%), enterocutaneous fistula (1%), anastomotic leak (1%), and late abdominal wall abscess (1%). Of the patients, 16% stayed longer than 5 days despite having no postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients undergoing loop ileostomy reversal at our institution can be discharged earlier than they are at present. Support in the community and the implementation of modified UK day-case surgery protocols are suggested to help shorten patients' length of stay.

摘要

引言

近期研究表明,袢式回肠造口关闭术可在日间手术环境下进行,从而缩短住院时间并降低住院费用。通过分析我们接受回肠造口还纳术的患者,我们旨在确定住院时间以及超过24小时住院时间背后的潜在因素。

患者与方法

对某一结直肠科接受袢式回肠造口关闭术的患者数据库进行了检查。记录了出院时间、发病率和再入院率。

结果

2001年1月至2006年1月期间,80例患者接受了回肠造口还纳术。中位年龄为63岁(范围22 - 81岁)。中位住院时间为4天(范围2 - 32天)。无并发症患者的中位住院时间为4天。许多患者似乎能够更早出院。72例患者(90%)在48小时内能够耐受固体饮食,54例患者(67.5%)在3天内恢复肠道功能。6例患者在肠道功能恢复前出院;这些患者均未再入院。20例患者(25%)出现并发症,包括伤口感染(8%)、小肠梗阻/肠梗阻(6%)、肠皮肤瘘(1%)、吻合口漏(1%)和晚期腹壁脓肿(1%)。在这些患者中,16%尽管没有术后并发症,但住院时间超过了5天。

结论

在我们机构接受袢式回肠造口还纳术的大多数患者可以比目前更早出院。建议社区提供支持并实施改良的英国日间手术方案,以帮助缩短患者的住院时间。

相似文献

1
Postoperative management after loop ileostomy closure: are we keeping patients in hospital too long?回肠袢式造口关闭术后的管理:我们让患者住院时间过长了吗?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Jan;92(1):51-5. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12518836439209.
2
Study protocol evaluating the use of bowel stimulation before loop ileostomy closure to reduce postoperative ileus: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.评估术前肠道刺激在回肠袢式造口关闭术中减少术后肠梗阻的应用效果的研究方案:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov;19(11):1024-1029. doi: 10.1111/codi.13720.
3
Closure of loop ileostomies: is early discharge safe and achievable?回肠袢式造口关闭术:提前出院是否安全可行?
Scott Med J. 2010 Feb;55(1):27-9. doi: 10.1258/RSMSMJ.55.1.27.
4
Loop ileostomy closure at an ambulatory surgery facility: a safe and cost-effective alternative to routine hospitalization.在门诊手术机构进行回肠造口闭合术:一种安全且具成本效益的常规住院替代方案。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Apr;46(4):486-90. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6587-0.
5
Reversal of loop ileostomy under an Enhanced Recovery Programme - Is the stapled anastomosis technique still better than the handsewn technique?增强康复方案下的回肠袢式造口还纳术——吻合技术是吻合器吻合优于手工缝合吗?
Int J Surg. 2015 Nov;23(Pt A):41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.09.039. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
6
Loop Ileostomy Closure as an Overnight Procedure: Institutional Comparison With the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Data Set.回肠造口关闭术作为一种日间手术:与国家外科质量改进项目数据集的机构比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Aug;60(8):852-859. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000793.
7
Early and Late Closure of Loop Ileostomies: A Retrospective Comparative Outcomes Analysis.回肠袢式造口术的早期和晚期关闭:一项回顾性比较结果分析。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018 Dec;64(12):30-35.
8
Reducing Readmissions While Shortening Length of Stay: The Positive Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Colorectal Surgery.在缩短住院时间的同时减少再入院率:强化康复方案在结直肠癌手术中的积极影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Feb;60(2):219-227. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000748.
9
Risk factors for reoperation after ileostomy reversal - Results from a prospective cohort study.回肠造口还纳术后再次手术的风险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):233-239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.043. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
10
Protective ileostomy: complications and mortality associated with its closure.保护性回肠造口术:关闭相关的并发症和死亡率。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2012 Jul;104(7):350-4. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082012000700003.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway Versus Standard Care in Patients Undergoing Elective Stoma Reversal Surgery- A Randomized Controlled Trial.择期造口回纳手术患者术后加速康复(ERAS)路径与标准护理的比较——一项随机对照试验
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Nov;27(11):2667-2675. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05803-9. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
2
Short-stay compared to long-stay admissions for loop ileostomy reversals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.短期住院与长期住院患者行回肠袢式造口还纳术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Oct;37(10):2113-2124. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04256-x. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
3
Outcome of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Patients Undergoing Small Bowel Surgery.小肠手术患者术后加速康复方案的结果
Cureus. 2020 Oct 21;12(10):e11073. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11073.
4
Protective Loop Ileostomy Closure Techniques: Comparison of Three Different Surgical Techniques.保护性回肠造口关闭技术:三种不同手术技术的比较
Cureus. 2020 Oct 16;12(10):e10977. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10977.
5
Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.回肠袢式造口关闭术后肠麻痹的发生率及预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2430-2443. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06794-y. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
6
Review of an emergency general surgery process improvement program at a verified military trauma center.某军队创伤中心实施的急诊普通外科流程改进计划回顾。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Oct;32(10):4321-4328. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6303-0. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
7
Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications Following Diverting Loop Ileostomy Takedown.预防性回肠造口还纳术后并发症的危险因素。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Dec;21(12):2048-2055. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3567-y. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
8
Complications after Loop Ileostomy Closure: A Retrospective Analysis of 132 Patients.回肠造口关闭术后的并发症:132例患者的回顾性分析
Viszeralmedizin. 2014 Aug;30(4):276-80. doi: 10.1159/000366218.
9
Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review.溃疡性结肠炎和家族性腺瘤性息肉病行结直肠切除术后回肠袢式造口关闭术的发病率:一项系统评价
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Dec;18(12):2192-200. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2660-8. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
10
Identifying causes for high readmission rates after stoma reversal.确定造口回纳术后高再入院率的原因。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1263-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3320-x. Epub 2013 Nov 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The outcome of loop ileostomy closure: a prospective study.回肠袢式造口关闭术的结果:一项前瞻性研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jun;10(5):460-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01385.x. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
2
Primary closure of the skin after stoma closure. Management of wound infections is easy without (long-term) complications.造口关闭术后皮肤的一期缝合。伤口感染易于处理,无(长期)并发症。
Dig Surg. 2006;23(4):255-8. doi: 10.1159/000095399. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
3
Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery.结肠手术中强化康复计划的系统评价
Br J Surg. 2006 Jul;93(7):800-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5384.
4
Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques.回肠造口关闭术后伤口感染:一项比较一期缝合与延迟一期缝合技术的前瞻性随机研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2005 Dec;9(3):206-8. doi: 10.1007/s10151-005-0228-z. Epub 2005 Nov 21.
5
Selective serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for postoperative nausea and vomiting: are they all the same?用于术后恶心呕吐的选择性5-羟色胺5-HT3受体拮抗剂:它们都一样吗?
CNS Drugs. 2005;19(3):225-38. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200519030-00004.
6
Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients.恢复性直肠结肠切除术后回肠造口闭合术:1504例患者的结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Feb;48(2):243-50. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0771-0.
7
Short-term outcome of loop ileostomy closure under local anesthesia: results of a feasibility study.局部麻醉下袢式回肠造口关闭术的短期结局:一项可行性研究的结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Nov;47(11):1930-3. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0686-9.
8
Loop ileostomy closure at an ambulatory surgery facility: a safe and cost-effective alternative to routine hospitalization.在门诊手术机构进行回肠造口闭合术:一种安全且具成本效益的常规住院替代方案。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Apr;46(4):486-90. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6587-0.
9
Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity.功能性回肠造口术和吻合器侧侧吻合术的发病率较低。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001 Jul;83(4):246-9.
10
Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy: a randomized controlled trial.吻合器与缝线闭合袢式回肠造口术:一项随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2000 Feb;231(2):202-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200002000-00008.