Yale Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 1;50(2):693-700. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.101. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and a naturalistic joint attention scenario to evaluate two, alternative hypotheses concerning the social brain. The first, Content Specific Attribution hypothesis, was that core regions previously identified as being involved in social cognition also participate in representing the contents of another mind. The second, Dual Role hypothesis, was that extrastriate, category-specific visual regions respond to a visible stimulus of a specific category and to the same stimulus occluded, but when it appears to be the focus of another person's visual attention. Participants viewed category-specific stimuli (Place and Body images) to localize the extrastriate body area (EBA) and parahippocampal place area (PPA). Then, they observed a computerized character viewing each stimulus category, occluded from the participant's view. In support of the Content Specific Attribution hypothesis, whole-brain analyses revealed that viewing someone else looking at an occluded picture of a body activated brain regions previously associated with components of social cognition more than viewing someone else looking at an occluded picture of a place. Counter to the Dual Role hypothesis, functional region of interest (ROI) analyses revealed that the EBA and PPA were not clearly involved in representing what the character was seeing.
我们使用功能磁共振成像 (fMRI) 和自然联合注意场景来评估关于社会大脑的两个替代假设。第一个是内容特异性归因假说,即以前被确定为参与社会认知的核心区域也参与表示另一个心智的内容。第二个是双重角色假说,即外纹状体、类别特异性视觉区域对特定类别的可见刺激和被遮挡的相同刺激作出反应,但当它似乎是另一个人视觉注意的焦点时。参与者观察类别特异性刺激(地点和身体图像)以定位外纹状体身体区域 (EBA) 和旁海马体位置区域 (PPA)。然后,他们观察计算机化字符观察每个被参与者视线遮挡的刺激类别。支持内容特异性归因假说,全脑分析表明,观察别人看一个被遮挡的身体图片比观察别人看一个被遮挡的地点图片更能激活以前与社会认知成分相关的大脑区域。与双重角色假说相反,功能感兴趣区域 (ROI) 分析表明,EBA 和 PPA 并没有明显参与表示字符所看到的内容。