• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 fMRI 研究的日语汉字音韵选择的神经基础。

Neural substrates of phonological selection for Japanese character Kanji based on fMRI investigations.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 15;50(3):1280-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.099. Epub 2010 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.099
PMID:20056159
Abstract

Japanese and Chinese both share the same ideographic/logographic character system. How these characters are processed, however, is inherently different for each language. We harnessed the unique property of homophone judgment in Japanese kanji to provide an analogous Chinese condition using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 33 native Japanese speakers. We compared two types of kanji: (1) kanji that usually evokes only one pronunciation to Japanese speakers, which is representative of most Chinese characters (monophonic character); (2) kanji that evoked multiple pronunciation candidates, which is typical in Japanese kanji (heterophonic character). Results showed that character pairs with multiple sound possibilities increased activation in posterior regions of the left, middle and inferior frontal gyri (MFG and IFG), the bilateral anterior insulae, and the left anterior cingulate cortex as compared with those of kanji with only one sound. The activity seen in the MFG, dorsal IFG, and ventral IFG in the left posterior lateral prefrontal cortex, which was thought to correspond with language components of orthography, phonology, and semantics, respectively, was discussed in regards to their potentially important roles in information selection among competing sources of the components. A comparison with previous studies suggested that detailed analyses of activation in these language areas could explain differences between Japanese and Chinese, such as a greater involvement of the prefrontal language production regions for Japanese, whereas, for Chinese there is more phonological processing of inputs in the superior temporal gyrus.

摘要

日语和汉语都使用表意文字系统。然而,这两种语言对这些字符的处理方式却大不相同。我们利用日语汉字同音判断的独特属性,利用事件相关功能磁共振成像(fMRI)技术,在 33 名母语为日语的日本人中,为汉语提供了类似的条件。我们比较了两种类型的汉字:(1)对日本人来说通常只有一种发音的汉字,这代表了大多数汉字(单音字);(2)有多种发音候选的汉字,这在日语汉字中很常见(多音字)。结果表明,与只有一种发音的汉字相比,具有多种发音可能性的汉字对会增加左、中、下额下回(MFG 和 IFG)、双侧前岛叶和左前扣带回皮质的激活。在左后外侧前额叶的 MFG、背侧 IFG 和腹侧 IFG 中观察到的活动,分别被认为对应于字形、音韵和语义的语言成分,被讨论为它们在语言成分的竞争来源之间进行信息选择的潜在重要作用。与之前的研究进行比较表明,对这些语言区域的激活进行详细分析,可以解释日语和汉语之间的差异,例如日语中涉及更多的前额叶语言产生区域,而对于汉语,在颞上回中对输入进行更多的语音处理。

相似文献

1
Neural substrates of phonological selection for Japanese character Kanji based on fMRI investigations.基于 fMRI 研究的日语汉字音韵选择的神经基础。
Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 15;50(3):1280-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.099. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
2
Implicit and explicit processing of kanji and kana words and non-words studied with fMRI.使用功能磁共振成像研究汉字和假名单词及非单词的内隐和外显加工。
Neuroimage. 2004 Nov;23(3):878-89. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.059.
3
Testing for dual brain processing routes in reading: a direct contrast of chinese character and pinyin reading using FMRI.阅读中双脑加工路径的测试:使用功能磁共振成像对汉字阅读和拼音阅读的直接对比
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Oct 1;14(7):1088-98. doi: 10.1162/089892902320474535.
4
Neural strategies for reading Japanese and Chinese sentences: a cross-linguistic fMRI study of character-decoding and morphosyntax.阅读日汉句子的神经策略:汉字解码和形态句法的跨语言 fMRI 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Sep;50(11):2598-604. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.011. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
5
Hierarchical coding of characters in the ventral and dorsal visual streams of Chinese language processing.中文语言处理腹侧和背侧视觉通路中字符的分层编码。
Neuroimage. 2009 Nov 1;48(2):423-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.078. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
6
Activation of lateral extrastriate areas during orthographic processing of Japanese characters studied with fMRI.使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究日语字符正字法加工过程中外侧纹外区域的激活情况。
Neuroimage. 1999 Feb;9(2):208-15. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0400.
7
Similar brain activation patterns for writing logographic and phonetic symbols in Chinese.书写中文象形字和形声字时类似的大脑激活模式。
Neuroreport. 2007 Oct 8;18(15):1621-5. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f0405b.
8
Orthographic and phonological processing of Chinese characters: an fMRI study.汉字的正字法和语音处理:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1721-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.007.
9
Language experience shapes fusiform activation when processing a logographic artificial language: an fMRI training study.语言经验在处理表意人工语言时塑造梭状回激活:一项功能磁共振成像训练研究。
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1315-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.055. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
10
Neuronal correlates of consistency and frequency effects on Chinese character naming: an event-related fMRI study.汉字命名中一致性和频率效应的神经元关联:一项事件相关功能磁共振成像研究
Neuroimage. 2004 Dec;23(4):1235-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.064.

引用本文的文献

1
Phonological properties of logographic words modulate brain activation in bilinguals: a comparative study of Chinese characters and Japanese Kanji.表意文字的语音属性对双语者大脑激活的调节作用:汉字与日文汉字的比较研究
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Apr 1;34(4). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae150.
2
Domain-general and domain-specific functional networks of Broca's area underlying language processing.Broca 区语言处理的领域普遍和领域特定功能网络。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jul;13(7):e3046. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3046. Epub 2023 May 3.
3
Neural representation of phonological information during Chinese character reading.
汉字阅读过程中语音信息的神经表示。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Sep;43(13):4013-4029. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25900. Epub 2022 May 12.
4
A brain-region-based meta-analysis method utilizing the Apriori algorithm.一种利用Apriori算法的基于脑区的元分析方法。
BMC Neurosci. 2016 May 18;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12868-016-0257-8.
5
Neural basis of hierarchical visual form processing of Japanese Kanji characters.日语汉字分层视觉形式处理的神经基础。
Brain Behav. 2015 Nov 4;5(12):e00413. doi: 10.1002/brb3.413. eCollection 2015 Dec.
6
Different patterns and development characteristics of processing written logographic characters and alphabetic words: an ALE meta-analysis.处理表意文字和字母文字的不同模式及发展特征:一项激活可能性估计元分析
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jun;35(6):2607-18. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22354. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
7
A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading.回顾和综合了过去 20 年中关于听觉言语、口语和阅读的 PET 和 fMRI 研究。
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):816-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062. Epub 2012 May 12.