• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更多医生还是更好的护理?

More doctors or better care?

作者信息

Watson Diane E, McGrail Kimberlyn M

出版信息

Healthc Q. 2009;12(4):101-4. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2013.21134.

DOI:10.12927/hcq.2013.21134
PMID:20057237
Abstract

The Canadian Medical Association's More Doctors, More Care campaign seeks to align physician supply targets with policy decisions elsewhere in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Using OECD data for 19 countries to assess the relationship between physician supply and healthcare outcomes, we have determined that there is no association between avoidable mortality and overall physician supply. Similarly, there is no relationship between avoidable mortality and general practitioners and family physicians per capita, specialists per capita, nurses per capita, doctors and nurses per capita or health expenditures per capita. These findings should move us to recognize that (a) more doctors will not necessarily translate into better healthcare outcomes for Canadians and (b) it is in Canadians' better interests that we instead focus on realizing opportunities to improve access to high-quality care and to ensure that changes in physician turnover do not threaten the current generalist-to-specialist mix.

摘要

加拿大医学协会的“更多医生,更多护理”运动旨在使医生供应目标与经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)其他地方的政策决策保持一致。利用经合组织19个国家的数据来评估医生供应与医疗保健结果之间的关系,我们确定可避免死亡率与总体医生供应之间没有关联。同样,可避免死亡率与人均全科医生和家庭医生、人均专科医生、人均护士、人均医生和护士或人均医疗支出之间也没有关系。这些发现应促使我们认识到:(a)更多的医生不一定能为加拿大人带来更好的医疗保健结果;(b)我们应转而专注于实现改善获得高质量护理的机会,并确保医生更替的变化不会威胁到目前全科医生与专科医生的比例,这才符合加拿大人的更大利益。

相似文献

1
More doctors or better care?更多医生还是更好的护理?
Healthc Q. 2009;12(4):101-4. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2013.21134.
2
More doctors or better care?更多医生还是更好的护理?
Healthc Policy. 2009 Aug;5(1):26-31.
3
Projecting shortages and surpluses of doctors and nurses in the OECD: what looms ahead.预测经合组织国家医生和护士的短缺和过剩:未来的趋势。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2019 Apr;14(2):274-290. doi: 10.1017/S174413311700055X. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
4
Disability in two health care systems: access, quality, satisfaction, and physician contacts among working-age Canadians and Americans with disabilities.两种医疗保健系统中的残疾状况:有残疾的加拿大和美国工作年龄人群在获得医疗服务、医疗质量、满意度和医生接触方面的情况。
Disabil Health J. 2008 Oct;1(4):196-208. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.07.006.
5
The effect of physician supply on health status: Canadian evidence.医生供给对健康状况的影响:来自加拿大的证据。
Health Policy. 2014 Oct;118(1):56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
6
Profile of the cardiovascular specialist physician workforce in Canada, 2004.2004年加拿大心血管专科医生队伍概况
Can J Cardiol. 2005 Nov;21(13):1157-62.
7
Benchmarking the US physician workforce. An alternative to needs-based or demand-based planning.对美国医生劳动力进行基准评估。一种基于需求或基于需求规划的替代方法。
JAMA. 1996 Dec 11;276(22):1811-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.22.1811.
8
International health care spending.国际医疗保健支出。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1986 Fall;5(3):111-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.5.3.111.
9
Breaking the Deadlock: Towards a New Intergovernmental Relationship in Canadian Healthcare.打破僵局:迈向加拿大医疗保健领域新的政府间关系
Healthc Pap. 2014;14(3):7-15. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2015.24262.
10
What can the Canadians and Americans learn from each other's health care systems?加拿大人和美国人可以从彼此的医疗保健系统中学到什么?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2016 Jul;31(3):349-70. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2374. Epub 2016 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations Between Physician Supply Levels and Amenable Mortality Rates: An Analysis of Taiwan Over Nearly 4 Decades.医师供应水平与可避免死亡率之间的关联:对台湾近40年的分析
Health Serv Insights. 2020 Sep 10;13:1178632920954878. doi: 10.1177/1178632920954878. eCollection 2020.
2
An Empirical Investigation of "Physician Congestion" in U.S. University Hospitals.美国大学医院中“医生拥堵”现象的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 2;16(5):761. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050761.
3
Examining the relationship between human resources and mortality: the effects of methodological choices.
探究人力资源与死亡率之间的关系:方法选择的影响。
Int J Public Health. 2017 Apr;62(3):361-370. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0935-4. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
4
What, if anything, does amenable mortality tell us about regional health system performance?可避免死亡率能告诉我们关于地区卫生系统绩效的哪些信息(如果有的话)?
Healthc Policy. 2013 Feb;8(3):79-90.