Jean Causse Ear Clinic, Traverse de Béziers, Colombiers, France.
Laryngoscope. 2010 Mar;120(3):570-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.20772.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To compare short-term hearing results in patients undergoing laser stapedotomy for primary otosclerosis using either the flexible potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) or CO(2) laser fiber.
Prospective nonrandomized clinical study at a tertiary referral center.
Two hundred fourteen patients undergoing 214 stapedotomies for otosclerotic stapes fixation were enrolled in this study from January 2008 to January 2010. Comparative analyses were made between a group of 107 patients who underwent stapedotomy with the flexible KTP laser fiber and 107 patients who underwent stapedotomy with the flexible CO(2) laser fiber. Preoperative and postoperative audiometric evaluation at 3 months using conventional audiometry, namely, air-bone gap (ABG), bone-conduction thresholds, and air-conduction thresholds, were assessed.
In the KTP laser group the postoperative ABG was 4.3 dB compared to 3 dB in the CO(2) group, which is a mean difference of 1.3 dB (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.3 to 2.8; P = .10). Of the patients from the KTP group, 92% had a postoperative ABG of 10 dB or less, as compared to 97% in the CO(2) group (mean difference 5%; 95% CI, -10 to 1; P = .14). The postoperative ABG at 4 kHz was 4.9 dB in the KTP and 2.2 dB in the CO(2) group, which is a mean difference of 2.7 dB (95% CI, 0.6-4.7, P = .01). No sensorineural hearing loss was reported.
The use of the CO(2) laser fiber appears to be associated with slightly better hearing results than the KTP laser fiber, especially when assessed at the 4 kHz frequency.
目的/假设:比较使用柔韧的 KTP 激光光纤或 CO₂激光光纤对原发性耳硬化症患者行激光镫骨切开术的短期听力结果。
在一家三级转诊中心进行的前瞻性非随机临床研究。
本研究纳入了 2008 年 1 月至 2010 年 1 月期间因耳硬化症镫骨固定而行 214 例镫骨切开术的 214 例患者。对使用柔韧的 KTP 激光光纤进行镫骨切开术的 107 例患者和使用柔韧的 CO₂激光光纤进行镫骨切开术的 107 例患者进行了比较分析。使用常规听力测试(即气骨导差(ABG)、骨导阈值和气导阈值)评估术前和术后 3 个月的听力评估。
在 KTP 激光组中,术后 ABG 为 4.3dB,而 CO₂组为 3dB,平均差异为 1.3dB(95%置信区间[CI],-0.3 至 2.8;P =.10)。在 KTP 组中,92%的患者术后 ABG 为 10dB 或更低,而 CO₂组为 97%(平均差异 5%;95%CI,-10 至 1;P =.14)。在 KTP 组中,术后 4kHz 的 ABG 为 4.9dB,而在 CO₂组中为 2.2dB,平均差异为 2.7dB(95%CI,0.6-4.7,P =.01)。未报告感音神经性听力损失。
与 KTP 激光光纤相比,CO₂激光光纤的使用似乎与更好的听力结果相关,尤其是在 4kHz 频率下评估时。