Suppr超能文献

一项基于耳科学-神经耳科学数据库的原发性耳硬化症中钛酸钾和 CO2 激光纤维镫骨切开术的非随机比较。

A nonrandomized comparison of potassium titanyl phosphate and CO2 laser fiber stapedotomy for primary otosclerosis with the otology-neurotology database.

机构信息

Jean Causse Ear Clinic, Traverse de Béziers, Colombiers, France.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2010 Mar;120(3):570-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.20772.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To compare short-term hearing results in patients undergoing laser stapedotomy for primary otosclerosis using either the flexible potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) or CO(2) laser fiber.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized clinical study at a tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Two hundred fourteen patients undergoing 214 stapedotomies for otosclerotic stapes fixation were enrolled in this study from January 2008 to January 2010. Comparative analyses were made between a group of 107 patients who underwent stapedotomy with the flexible KTP laser fiber and 107 patients who underwent stapedotomy with the flexible CO(2) laser fiber. Preoperative and postoperative audiometric evaluation at 3 months using conventional audiometry, namely, air-bone gap (ABG), bone-conduction thresholds, and air-conduction thresholds, were assessed.

RESULTS

In the KTP laser group the postoperative ABG was 4.3 dB compared to 3 dB in the CO(2) group, which is a mean difference of 1.3 dB (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.3 to 2.8; P = .10). Of the patients from the KTP group, 92% had a postoperative ABG of 10 dB or less, as compared to 97% in the CO(2) group (mean difference 5%; 95% CI, -10 to 1; P = .14). The postoperative ABG at 4 kHz was 4.9 dB in the KTP and 2.2 dB in the CO(2) group, which is a mean difference of 2.7 dB (95% CI, 0.6-4.7, P = .01). No sensorineural hearing loss was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the CO(2) laser fiber appears to be associated with slightly better hearing results than the KTP laser fiber, especially when assessed at the 4 kHz frequency.

摘要

目的/假设:比较使用柔韧的 KTP 激光光纤或 CO₂激光光纤对原发性耳硬化症患者行激光镫骨切开术的短期听力结果。

研究设计

在一家三级转诊中心进行的前瞻性非随机临床研究。

方法

本研究纳入了 2008 年 1 月至 2010 年 1 月期间因耳硬化症镫骨固定而行 214 例镫骨切开术的 214 例患者。对使用柔韧的 KTP 激光光纤进行镫骨切开术的 107 例患者和使用柔韧的 CO₂激光光纤进行镫骨切开术的 107 例患者进行了比较分析。使用常规听力测试(即气骨导差(ABG)、骨导阈值和气导阈值)评估术前和术后 3 个月的听力评估。

结果

在 KTP 激光组中,术后 ABG 为 4.3dB,而 CO₂组为 3dB,平均差异为 1.3dB(95%置信区间[CI],-0.3 至 2.8;P =.10)。在 KTP 组中,92%的患者术后 ABG 为 10dB 或更低,而 CO₂组为 97%(平均差异 5%;95%CI,-10 至 1;P =.14)。在 KTP 组中,术后 4kHz 的 ABG 为 4.9dB,而在 CO₂组中为 2.2dB,平均差异为 2.7dB(95%CI,0.6-4.7,P =.01)。未报告感音神经性听力损失。

结论

与 KTP 激光光纤相比,CO₂激光光纤的使用似乎与更好的听力结果相关,尤其是在 4kHz 频率下评估时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验