Genex Cooperative Inc, Shawano, WI 54166, USA.
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jan;93(1):420-5. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2342.
Field data were collected over a period of 2 yr by artificial insemination technicians for the purpose of evaluating differences among bulls in their fertility when synchronization and semen sorting were involved. First, main effects of synchronization and semen sorting were found to reduce bull fertility by 1.5 and 12.7%, respectively. Second, the interaction of both factors with bull fertility significantly enhanced the evaluation models. Differences between 2 sets of adjusted conception rates for synchronized and nonsynchronized services ranged from 0.5 to 2.9%, whereas differences between 2 sets of adjusted conception rates for sorted and conventional semen ranged from -1.8 to 15.2%. This implies that using conventional fertility models that ignore these effects may not be sufficiently accurate in situations where synchronization or semen sorting are involved. Accounting for synchronization and especially for semen sorting to evaluate bulls on their fertility and the production of separate sets of conception rates under each situation are essential.
现场数据是由人工授精技术员在 2 年的时间里收集的,目的是评估在同步化和精液分类处理时,公牛之间的繁殖力差异。首先,同步化和精液分类处理的主要效应分别降低了公牛繁殖力的 1.5%和 12.7%。其次,这两个因素与公牛繁殖力的相互作用显著增强了评估模型。在同步化和非同步化服务的两组调整后受胎率之间的差异范围从 0.5%到 2.9%,而在分类和常规精液的两组调整后受胎率之间的差异范围从-1.8%到 15.2%。这意味着,在涉及同步化或精液分类处理的情况下,如果忽略这些效应,使用传统的生育力模型可能不够准确。在评估公牛的生育力和在每种情况下产生单独的受胎率时,考虑同步化,特别是精液分类处理是必不可少的。