Suppr超能文献

一项比较表柔比星、顺铂和卡培他滨(ECX)与顺铂和卡培他滨(CX)联合化疗方案治疗晚期胃癌的随机 II 期临床研究。

A randomised phase II study of combination chemotherapy with epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) or cisplatin and capecitabine (CX) in advanced gastric cancer.

机构信息

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 135-710, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2010 Mar;46(5):885-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.12.015. Epub 2010 Jan 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both cisplatin/capecitabine (CX) and epirubicin plus CX (ECX) have clearly demonstrated efficacy against advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with histologically confirmed, measurable AGC were randomised to receive CX (cisplatin 75mg/m(2) iv on day 1 and capecitabine 1000mg/m(2) bid po on days 1-14) or ECX (epirubicin 50mg/m(2) plus CX) every 3weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Of the 91 registered patients, 45 patients were treated with CX and 44 with ECX. A total of 241 CX (median, 6; range, 1-12) and 201 ECX (median, 5; range, 1-11) cycles were delivered. Treatment duration was similar for both arms (4.4 for CX versus 4.2months for ECX). There was no relevant difference in the occurrence of overall grade 3 or 4 toxicities between the CX and ECX arms (80% versus 78%, respectively; P=0.516). However, none in the CX and 12% in the ECX arm discontinued treatment because of toxicity. There were no significant differences in therapeutic efficacy between CX and ECX with respect to the response rate (38% versus 37%, respectively) and PFS (6.4 versus 6.5months).

CONCLUSION

Both CX and ECX appear to be active as first-line chemotherapy for AGC, and the safety profiles are acceptable. Given the comparable efficacy results, CX could be a reasonable standard chemotherapy for untreated AGC patients.

摘要

背景

顺铂/卡培他滨(CX)和表柔比星加 CX(ECX)均已明确显示对晚期胃癌(AGC)有效。

方法

对组织学确诊、可测量的 AGC 患者进行化疗初治随机分组,接受 CX(顺铂 75mg/m²iv 第 1 天和卡培他滨 1000mg/m²bid po 第 1-14 天)或 ECX(表柔比星 50mg/m²加 CX)治疗,每 3 周 1 次。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

在登记的 91 例患者中,45 例接受 CX 治疗,44 例接受 ECX 治疗。共给予 241 个 CX(中位数为 6;范围为 1-12)和 201 个 ECX(中位数为 5;范围为 1-11)周期。两组治疗持续时间相似(CX 为 4.4 个月,ECX 为 4.2 个月)。CX 和 ECX 组的总体 3 级或 4 级毒性发生率无显著差异(分别为 80%和 78%;P=0.516)。但是,CX 组无患者因毒性而停止治疗,而 ECX 组有 12%的患者因毒性而停止治疗。在反应率(分别为 38%和 37%)和 PFS(分别为 6.4 个月和 6.5 个月)方面,CX 和 ECX 之间的疗效无显著差异。

结论

CX 和 ECX 均作为 AGC 的一线化疗药物显示出活性,安全性可接受。鉴于疗效结果相当,CX 可作为未经治疗的 AGC 患者的合理标准化疗药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验