• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮穿刺抽气与胸腔引流治疗自发性气胸:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Percutaneous aspiration versus tube drainage for spontaneous pneumothorax: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Thoracic Surgery Service, Hospital Donostia, Paseo Dr. Beguiristain 115, Donostia-San Sebastián 20014, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 May;37(5):1129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.12.008
PMID:20060735
Abstract

Spontaneous pneumothorax is an extremely frequent pathology. Despite this, there is still no clear consensus on managing these patients. Therefore, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of percutaneous aspiration compared with tube drainage for treating idiopathic spontaneous pneumothorax. Controlled, randomised clinical trials were selected, in which the effectiveness of percutaneous aspiration is compared with that of chest tube drainage, in terms of resolution of the pneumothorax and rates of relapse and hospital admission. Relevant articles were identified by searching electronic databases (e.g., Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, mRCT and Pascal), as well as the references of the papers found in this manner, with a cut-off date of April 2009. Quality was assessed by two independent evaluators, using the CASPe appraisal tool. Effectiveness of percutaneous aspiration is compared with that of chest tube drainage, in terms of resolution of the pneumothorax and rates of relapse and hospital admission.

摘要

自发性气胸是一种非常常见的疾病。尽管如此,对于这类患者的处理方法仍未达成明确的共识。因此,我们对经皮抽气与胸腔引流治疗特发性自发性气胸的疗效进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。我们选择了对照、随机临床试验,比较了经皮抽气与胸腔引流在气胸消退、复发率和住院率方面的疗效。通过检索电子数据库(如 Medline、EMBASE、CENTRAL、mRCT 和 Pascal)以及通过这种方式找到的文献的参考文献,确定了相关文章,并设定了截止日期为 2009 年 4 月。使用 CASPe 评估工具由两位独立评估者评估质量。比较了经皮抽气与胸腔引流在气胸消退、复发率和住院率方面的疗效。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous aspiration versus tube drainage for spontaneous pneumothorax: systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮穿刺抽气与胸腔引流治疗自发性气胸:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 May;37(5):1129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
2
Simple aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adults.成人原发性自发性气胸的单纯抽气与肋间置管引流比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 7;9(9):CD004479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004479.pub3.
3
Simple aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adults.成人原发性自发性气胸的单纯抽气与肋间置管引流对比研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD004479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004479.pub2.
4
Needle aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for pneumothorax in the newborn.新生儿气胸的针吸术与肋间置管引流术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 11(1):CD011724. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011724.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Needle aspiration versus incision and drainage for the treatment of peritonsillar abscess.针吸术与切开引流术治疗扁桃体周围脓肿的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 23;12(12):CD006287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006287.pub4.
7
Ablative and non-surgical therapies for early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.早期和极早期肝细胞癌的消融和非手术治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Dec;27(29):1-172. doi: 10.3310/GK5221.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Surgical versus non-surgical management for pleural empyema.胸腔积脓的手术治疗与非手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 17;3(3):CD010651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010651.pub2.
10
Simple aspiration versus chest-tube insertion in the management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a systematic review.原发性自发性气胸治疗中单纯抽气与胸腔闭式引流的比较:一项系统评价
Respir Med. 2004 Jul;98(7):579-90. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.04.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Needle Aspiration Versus Closed Thoracostomy in the Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Meta-analysis.针吸与闭式引流治疗自发性气胸的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Lung. 2020 Apr;198(2):333-344. doi: 10.1007/s00408-020-00322-9. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
2
How should complete lung collapse secondary to primary spontaneous pneumothorax be managed? .对于原发性自发性气胸导致的完全性肺萎陷,应该如何处理?
Clin Med (Lond). 2019 Mar;19(2):163-168. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-163.
3
Chest tube drainage versus needle aspiration for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: which is better?
胸腔闭式引流术与针吸术治疗原发性自发性气胸:哪种方法更好?
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Oct;9(10):4027-4038. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.08.140.
4
Simple aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adults.成人原发性自发性气胸的单纯抽气与肋间置管引流比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 7;9(9):CD004479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004479.pub3.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of initial management of pneumothorax in adults: Intercostal tube drainage versus other invasive methods.成人气胸初始治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析:肋间置管引流与其他侵入性方法的比较
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 22;12(6):e0178802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178802. eCollection 2017.
6
[Postoperative secondary spontaneous pneumothorax complicating a recurrent nerve palsy].[术后继发性自发性气胸并发喉返神经麻痹]
Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Jul 7;18:208. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2014.18.208.4843. eCollection 2014.
7
Approach of the treatment for pneumothorax.气胸的治疗方法。
J Thorac Dis. 2014 Oct;6(Suppl 4):S416-20. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.08.24.