• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

536 例植入式皮下胸部端口的并发症发生率和结局:是否因主要操作者的培训水平不同而有所差异?

Complication rates and outcomes of 536 implanted subcutaneous chest ports: do rates differ based on the primary operator's level of training?

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2010 Apr;17(4):464-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.10.019. Epub 2010 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2009.10.019
PMID:20060749
Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Totally implanted subcutaneous central venous access devices (chest ports) are an attractive option for patients in need of intermittent, recurrent venous access. In our department, these are placed by different operator types including interventional radiology (IR) attending physicians, dedicated IR nurse practitioners (NP), and IR fellows/radiology residents. The purpose of our study is to assess the rate of complications of subcutaneous chest port placement among the different operator types.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all subcutaneous central venous access devices implanted in our department between October 8, 2004, and October 19, 2007, was undertaken. Total numbers of port days, overall complication rates for all operators, as well as complication rates for the various operator types were calculated and were compared using the chi square test.

RESULTS

A total of 558 patients had totally implanted subcutaneous central venous access devices placed during the period of study. Of these, 536 had documented follow-up and comprise the study population. A total of 89 were placed by attending physician alone, 133 by an NP, and 314 by an IR fellow or resident, with supervision by an attending physician. Mean duration of port usage was 341 days with 182,522 total port days. A total of 39 complications occurred (7.28%), including 27 infections (5%). There was no statistically significant difference in overall complication rates, including infection rates, among operator groups (P = .925).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm that well-trained physician extenders and trainees can safely perform chest port placement and that these providers, under appropriate supervision, can help provide improved access to chest port placement for patients and referring clinicians.

摘要

背景与目的

对于需要间歇性、反复性静脉通路的患者,完全植入皮下的中心静脉通路装置(胸端口)是一种有吸引力的选择。在我们的科室中,不同类型的操作者(包括介入放射科主治医生、专门的介入放射科护士从业者、介入放射科研究员/放射科住院医师)都可以进行此类操作。我们的研究目的是评估不同操作者类型进行皮下胸端口放置的并发症发生率。

材料与方法

对我们科室在 2004 年 10 月 8 日至 2007 年 10 月 19 日期间植入的所有皮下中央静脉通路装置进行回顾性分析。计算所有操作者的总置管天数、总体并发症发生率,以及不同操作者类型的并发症发生率,并使用卡方检验进行比较。

结果

在研究期间,共有 558 例患者接受了完全植入的皮下中央静脉通路装置。其中,536 例有记录的随访资料,构成了研究人群。共有 89 例由主治医生单独进行操作,133 例由护士从业者进行操作,314 例由介入放射科研究员/住院医师进行操作,由主治医生进行监督。平均置管使用时间为 341 天,总置管天数为 182522 天。共发生 39 例并发症(7.28%),包括 27 例感染(5%)。在总体并发症发生率(包括感染率)方面,操作者组之间无统计学显著差异(P=0.925)。

结论

我们的结果证实,经过良好培训的医师助手和学员可以安全地进行胸端口放置,并且在适当的监督下,这些提供者可以帮助为患者和转诊临床医生提供更好的胸端口放置途径。

相似文献

1
Complication rates and outcomes of 536 implanted subcutaneous chest ports: do rates differ based on the primary operator's level of training?536 例植入式皮下胸部端口的并发症发生率和结局:是否因主要操作者的培训水平不同而有所差异?
Acad Radiol. 2010 Apr;17(4):464-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.10.019. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
2
Complication rate of venous access procedures performed by a radiology practitioner assistant compared with interventional radiology physicians and supervised trainees.放射科执业助理与介入放射科医生及带教实习生进行静脉穿刺操作的并发症发生率比较。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Aug;18(8):1001-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.05.014.
3
Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.小儿人群中低调可植入式静脉通路端口的放射学放置
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001 Nov-Dec;24(6):395-9. doi: 10.1007/s00270-001-0071-1. Epub 2001 Nov 8.
4
Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer.癌症患者中心静脉导管和完全植入式输液港的血栓形成和感染风险。
Thromb Res. 2010 Apr;125(4):318-21. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
5
Implantable subcutaneous venous access devices: is port fixation necessary? A review of 534 cases.植入式皮下静脉接入装置:是否需要端口固定?534 例回顾。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Aug;33(4):751-5. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9758-5. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
6
Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients.介入放射科医生放置中心静脉通路端口:125例连续患者的经验
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001 May-Jun;24(3):180-4. doi: 10.1007/s002700001721.
7
An 11-year retrospective study of totally implanted central venous access ports: complications and patient satisfaction.一项关于完全植入式中心静脉通路港的11年回顾性研究:并发症与患者满意度
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Mar;35(3):241-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.01.020. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
8
Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis.癌症患者皮下植入式中心静脉通路装置:一项前瞻性分析。
Cancer. 1997 Apr 15;79(8):1635-40.
9
"Blind" placement of long-term central venous access devices: report of 589 consecutive procedures.长期中心静脉通路装置的“盲法”置入:589例连续操作的报告
Am Surg. 1999 Jun;65(6):520-3; discussion 523-4.
10
A prospective randomized trial demonstrating valved implantable ports have fewer complications and lower overall cost than nonvalved implantable ports.一项前瞻性随机试验表明,带瓣膜的植入式端口比无瓣膜的植入式端口并发症更少,总体成本更低。
Am J Surg. 2004 Dec;188(6):722-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.041.

引用本文的文献

1
Matching intraoperative teaching and learning for medical undergraduates via modified briefing-intraoperative teaching-debriefing (BID) model.通过改良的术前介绍-术中教学-术后总结(BID)模型实现医学生术中教学相长。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 23;13(1):13732. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40755-9.
2
Forty years after the first totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) implant: the pure surgical cut-down technique only avoids immediate complications that can be fatal.首例完全植入式静脉输液港(TIVAD)植入 40 年后:单纯的外科切开技术仅能避免可致命的即刻并发症。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Sep;406(6):1739-1749. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02225-6. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Resident Experience Associated with Lung Biopsy Outcomes: A Cross-Sectional Study of Diagnostic Radiology Residents. Does the Level of Training Matter?
与肺活检结果相关的住院医师经验:一项针对诊断放射学住院医师的横断面研究。培训水平重要吗?
Kans J Med. 2020 Sep 11;13:235-241. eCollection 2020.
4
Implanting totally implantable venous access port via the internal jugular vein guided by ultrasonography is feasible and safe in patients with breast cancer.在超声引导下经颈内静脉植入全植入式静脉通路端口对乳腺癌患者是可行且安全的。
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec 8;12:378. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-378.
5
Short-term and long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of central venous access port devices implanted at the forearm: a retrospective monocenter analysis in 1704 patients.在前臂植入的中心静脉通路端口装置的放射学引导插入术的短期和长期结果:对1704例患者的回顾性单中心分析
Eur Radiol. 2015 Mar;25(3):606-16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3417-1. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
6
Value of superficial cultures for prediction of catheter-related bloodstream infection in long-term catheters: a prospective study.表面培养物对长期留置导管相关性血流感染预测的价值:一项前瞻性研究。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Sep;51(9):3025-30. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01351-13. Epub 2013 Jul 12.