Suppr超能文献

应用天然和重组猕猴桃过敏原进行猕猴桃过敏的成分分辨诊断。

Component-resolved diagnosis of kiwifruit allergy with purified natural and recombinant kiwifruit allergens.

机构信息

Department of Pathophysiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Mar;125(3):687-94, 694.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.017. Epub 2010 Jan 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Kiwifruit is one of the most common causes of food allergic reactions. Component-resolved diagnostics may enable significantly improved detection of sensitization to kiwifruit.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of individual allergens for component-resolved in vitro diagnosis of kiwifruit allergy.

METHODS

Thirty patients with a positive double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge to kiwifruit, 10 atopic subjects with negative open provocation to kiwifruit, and 5 nonatopic subjects were enrolled in the study. Specific IgE to 7 individual allergens (nAct d 1-5 and rAct d 8-9) and allergen extracts was measured by ImmunoCAP.

RESULTS

The diagnostic sensitivities of the commercial extract and of the sum of single allergens were 17% and 77%, respectively, whereas diagnostic specificities were 100% and 30%. A combination of the kiwi allergens Act d 1, Act d 2, Act d 4, and Act d 5 gave a diagnostic sensitivity of 40%, whereas diagnostic specificity remained high (90%). Exclusion of the Bet v 1 homolog recombinant (r) Act d 8 and profilin rAct d 9 from this allergen panel reduced sensitivity to 50% but increased specificity to 40%. Kiwifruit-monosensitized patients reacted more frequently (P < .001) with Act d 1 than polysensitized patients, whereas the latter group reacted more frequently with rAct d 8 (P = .004).

CONCLUSION

Use of single kiwifruit allergen ImmunoCAP increases the quantitative test performance and diagnostic sensitivity compared with the commercial extract. Bet v 1 homolog and profilin are important allergens in pollen-related kiwifruit allergy, whereas actinidin is important in monoallergy to kiwifruit, in which symptoms are often more severe.

摘要

背景

奇异果是最常见的食物过敏反应之一。成分分辨诊断可能显著提高对奇异果过敏的检测能力。

目的

评估单个过敏原在奇异果过敏的体外成分分辨诊断中的应用。

方法

研究纳入 30 例对奇异果进行双盲安慰剂对照食物挑战阳性的患者、10 例对奇异果进行开放激发试验阴性的特应性患者和 5 例非特应性患者。通过 ImmunoCAP 检测 7 种单一过敏原(nAct d 1-5 和 rAct d 8-9)和过敏原提取物的特异性 IgE。

结果

商业提取物和单一过敏原总和的诊断灵敏度分别为 17%和 77%,而诊断特异性分别为 100%和 30%。组合使用奇异果过敏原 Act d 1、Act d 2、Act d 4 和 Act d 5 的诊断灵敏度为 40%,而特异性仍保持较高水平(90%)。从该过敏原组中排除 Bet v 1 同源重组(r)Act d 8 和丝氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂 rAct d 9 后,敏感性降低至 50%,但特异性提高至 40%。奇异果单敏患者比多敏患者更频繁地对 Act d 1 产生反应(P<0.001),而后者更频繁地对 rAct d 8 产生反应(P=0.004)。

结论

与商业提取物相比,使用单一奇异果过敏原 ImmunoCAP 可提高定量检测性能和诊断灵敏度。Bet v 1 同源物和丝氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂是花粉相关奇异果过敏的重要过敏原,而 Actinidin 则是奇异果单敏的重要过敏原,且其症状通常更严重。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验