Suppr超能文献

除颤后长时间室颤后浦肯野纤维激活先于心室肌激活。

Purkinje activation precedes myocardial activation following defibrillation after long-duration ventricular fibrillation.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2010 Mar;7(3):405-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.11.025. Epub 2009 Dec 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While reentry within the ventricular myocardium (VM) is responsible for the maintenance of short-duration ventricular fibrillation (SDVF; VF duration <1 minute), Purkinje fibers (PFs) are important in the maintenance of long-duration ventricular fibrillation (LDVF; VF duration >1 minute).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the mechanisms of defibrillation may also be different for SDVF and LDVF.

METHODS

A multielectrode basket catheter was deployed in the left ventricle of eight beagles. External defibrillation shocks were delivered with a ramp-up protocol after SDVF (20 seconds) and LDVF (150 seconds). Earliest VM and PF activations were identified after the highest energy shock that failed to terminate VF and the successful shock.

RESULTS

Defibrillation was successful after 36 +/- 12 and 181 +/- 14 seconds for SDVF and LDVF, respectively. The time after shock delivery until earliest activation was detected for failed shocks and was significantly longer after LDVF (138.7 +/- 24.1 ms) than after SDVF (75.6 +/- 8.7 ms). Earliest postshock activation after SDVF typically initiated in the VM (14 of 16 episodes), while it always initiated in the PF (16 of 16 episodes) after LDVF. Sites of earliest activity during sinus rhythm correlated with sites of earliest postshock activation for PF-led cycles but not for VM-led cycles.

CONCLUSION

Earliest recorded postshock activation is in the Purkinje system after LDVF but not after SDVF. This difference raises the possibility that the optimal defibrillation strategy is different for SDVF and LDVF.

摘要

背景

虽然心室肌(VM)内的折返是维持短时间室颤(SDVF;VF 持续时间<1 分钟)的原因,但浦肯野纤维(PFs)在维持长时间室颤(LDVF;VF 持续时间>1 分钟)中很重要。

目的

本研究旨在检验以下假设,即 SDVF 和 LDVF 的除颤机制也可能不同。

方法

在 8 只比格犬的左心室部署了一个多电极篮状导管。在 SDVF(20 秒)和 LDVF(150 秒)后,使用斜坡升压方案进行体外除颤电击。在未能终止 VF 的最高能量电击后和成功电击后,确定最早的 VM 和 PF 激活。

结果

SDVF 和 LDVF 的除颤成功率分别为 36 +/- 12 秒和 181 +/- 14 秒。未能终止 VF 的电击和成功电击后,从电击输送到最早检测到激活的时间,在 LDVF 后(138.7 +/- 24.1 ms)显著长于 SDVF 后(75.6 +/- 8.7 ms)。SDVF 后最早的电击后激活通常发生在 VM(16 个发作中的 14 个),而 LDVF 后则始终发生在 PF(16 个发作中的 16 个)。窦性节律时最早的活动部位与 PF 引导周期后最早的电击后激活部位相关,但与 VM 引导周期后无关。

结论

LDVF 后最早记录的电击后激活发生在浦肯野系统中,但 SDVF 后则没有。这种差异提出了这样一种可能性,即 SDVF 和 LDVF 的最佳除颤策略可能不同。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Spatiotemporal Progression of Early Human Ventricular Fibrillation.早期人类心室颤动的时空进展。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec 11;3(12):1437-1446. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
7
Cardiac optogenetics.心脏光遗传学。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013 May;304(9):H1179-91. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00432.2012. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
9
Mechanisms of defibrillation.除颤机制。
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2010 Aug 15;12:233-58. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-070909-105305.

本文引用的文献

3
Towards predictive modelling of the electrophysiology of the heart.迈向心脏电生理学的预测建模。
Exp Physiol. 2009 May;94(5):563-77. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2008.044073. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
9
Intramural foci during long duration fibrillation in the pig ventricle.猪心室长时间颤动期间的壁内病灶。
Circ Res. 2008 May 23;102(10):1256-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.170399. Epub 2008 Apr 17.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验