Marsh-Tootle Wendy L, Funkhouser Ellen, Frazier Marcela G, Crenshaw Katie, Wall Terry C
Department of Optometry, School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA.
Optom Vis Sci. 2010 Feb;87(2):104-11. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181cc8d7c.
To evaluate knowledge, attitudes, and environment of primary care providers, and to develop a conceptual framework showing their impact on self-reported pre-school vision screening (PVS) behaviors.
Eligible primary care providers were individuals who filed claims with Medicaid agencies in Alabama, South Carolina, or Illinois, for at least eight well child checks for children aged 3 or 4 years during 1 year. Responses were obtained on-line from providers who enrolled in the intervention arm of a randomized trial to improve PVS. We calculated a summary score per provider per facet: (1) for behavior and knowledge, each correct answer was assigned a value of +1; and (2) for attitudes and environment, responses indicating support for PVS were assigned a value of +1, and other responses were assigned -1.
Responses were available from 53 participants (43 of 49 enrolled pediatricians, 8 of 14 enrolled family physicians, one general physician, and one nurse practitioner). Recognizing that amblyopia often presents without outward signs was positively related to good PVS: [odds ratio (OR) = 3.9; p = 0.06]. Reporting that "preschool VS interrupts patient flow" posed a significant barrier (OR = 0.2; p = 0.05). Providers with high summed scores on attitudes (OR = 6.0; p = 0.03), or knowledge and attitudes (OR = 11.4; p < 0.001) were significantly more likely to report good PVS behavior. There was a significant trend between the number of "good" scores on knowledge, attitudes or environment, and "good" PVS behavior (p = 0.04).
PVS is influenced by positive attitudes, especially when combined with knowledge about amblyopia. Interventions to improve PVS should target multiple facets, emphasizing (1) asymptomatic children are at risk for amblyopia, (2) specific evidence-based tests have high testability and sensitivity for amblyopia in pre-school children, and (3) new tests minimize interruptions to patient flow.
评估初级保健提供者的知识、态度和环境,并构建一个概念框架以展示其对自我报告的学前视力筛查(PVS)行为的影响。
符合条件的初级保健提供者是那些在阿拉巴马州、南卡罗来纳州或伊利诺伊州向医疗补助机构提交申请的个人,他们在1年内为3或4岁儿童进行了至少8次健康儿童检查。通过在线方式从参与一项旨在改善PVS的随机试验干预组的提供者那里获得了回复。我们为每个提供者的每个方面计算了一个总分:(1)对于行为和知识,每个正确答案赋值为+1;(2)对于态度和环境,表明支持PVS的回复赋值为+1,其他回复赋值为-1。
有53名参与者提供了回复(49名注册儿科医生中的43名,14名注册家庭医生中的8名,1名全科医生和1名执业护士)。认识到弱视通常无明显外在症状与良好的PVS呈正相关:[优势比(OR)= 3.9;p = 0.06]。报告“学前视力筛查会干扰患者流程”构成了一个重大障碍(OR = 0.2;p = 0.05)。态度总分高的提供者(OR = 6.0;p = 0.03),或知识与态度总分高的提供者(OR = 11.4;p < 0.001)更有可能报告良好的PVS行为。在知识、态度或环境方面的“良好”分数数量与“良好”的PVS行为之间存在显著趋势(p = 0.04)。
PVS受到积极态度的影响,尤其是与弱视知识相结合时。改善PVS的干预措施应针对多个方面,强调(1)无症状儿童有弱视风险,(2)特定的循证测试对学龄前儿童弱视具有高可测试性和敏感性,以及(3)新测试可最大程度减少对患者流程的干扰。