Department of Histopathology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Mod Pathol. 2010 Apr;23(4):611-8. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.178. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
It may be difficult to distinguish reactive glandular lesions from adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix, and although several immunohistochemical markers have established value in this diagnostic setting, none is completely reliable. We have noted that neoplastic endocervical lesions often show loss of nuclear cyclin D1 expression in contrast to benign glandular cells. Therefore, we investigated cyclin D1 staining in a series of 64 cervical biopsy specimens including examples of normal and reactive endocervical epithelium, adenocarcinoma in situ, stratified mucin-producing intraepithelial lesions, and invasive adenocarcinoma. Thirteen specimens also included a component of high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia. Normal endocervical epithelium usually expressed cyclin D1, although staining was typically focal, and there was increased immunoreactivity in reactive and metaplastic glandular cells including tubo-endometrioid metaplasia. In contrast, most cases of adenocarcinoma in situ were completely negative and, therefore, cyclin D1 staining distinguished benign from neoplastic epithelial cells. Although focal cyclin D1 expression was observed in 5/19 cases of adenocarcinoma in situ, the staining was associated with more marked cytological atypia precluding confusion with a reactive process. The invasive adenocarcinomas were mainly negative for cyclin D1. However, focal staining was observed in 10/19 cases and was mainly restricted to cells at the deep tumor margin, or to small infiltrative glands and detached cell clusters within the stroma. In conclusion, cyclin D1 can be included within an immunohistochemical panel to aid in the distinction between reactive cervical glandular lesions and adenocarcinoma in situ. The localized distribution of staining within invasive lesions suggests that cyclin D1 up-regulation has a specific role during the progression of some endocervical adenocarcinomas.
区分反应性宫颈腺病变与宫颈原位腺癌可能具有一定难度,尽管有几种免疫组化标志物在该诊断环境中已确立了一定的价值,但没有一种标志物是完全可靠的。我们注意到,肿瘤性宫颈内膜病变通常表现为核 cyclin D1 表达缺失,而良性腺体细胞则无此表现。因此,我们在包括正常和反应性宫颈内膜上皮、原位腺癌、柱状黏液性上皮内病变和浸润性腺癌在内的 64 例宫颈活检标本系列中研究了 cyclin D1 染色。13 例标本还包括高级别宫颈鳞状上皮内瘤变的成分。正常宫颈内膜上皮通常表达 cyclin D1,尽管染色通常呈局灶性,且在反应性和化生腺体细胞(包括管状-内 膜样化生)中免疫反应性增强。相反,大多数原位腺癌病例均完全阴性,因此 cyclin D1 染色可区分良性和肿瘤性上皮细胞。尽管在 5/19 例原位腺癌中观察到局灶性 cyclin D1 表达,但这种染色与更明显的细胞学异型性相关,从而可排除与反应性过程的混淆。浸润性腺癌主要 cyclin D1 阴性。然而,在 19 例中有 10 例观察到局灶性染色,主要局限于肿瘤深部边缘的细胞,或局限于间质中的小浸润性腺体和脱落的细胞簇。总之,cyclin D1 可纳入免疫组化标志物面板中,以辅助区分反应性宫颈腺病变与宫颈原位腺癌。染色在浸润性病变中的局灶性分布表明,cyclin D1 上调在某些宫颈内膜腺癌的进展中具有特定作用。