Suppr超能文献

家庭内部工作时间同步:是为了团聚还是物质利益?

Intra-household work time synchronization: Togetherness or material benefits?

作者信息

van Klaveren Chris, van den Brink Henriette Maassen

机构信息

Department of Economics and Econometrics, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, Amsterdam, 1018 WB The Netherlands.

出版信息

Soc Indic Res. 2007 Oct;84(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s11205-006-9072-4. Epub 2007 Jan 18.

Abstract

If partners derive utility from joint leisure time, it is expected that they will coordinate their work schedules in order to increase the amount of joint leisure. In order to control for differences in constraints and selection effects, this paper uses a new matching procedure, providing answers to the following questions: (1) Do partners coordinate their work schedules and does this result in work time synchronization?; (2) which partners synchronize more work hours?; and (3) is there a preference for togetherness? We find that coordination results in more synchronized work hours. The presence of children in the household is the main cause why some partners synchronize their work times less than other partners. Finally, partners coordinate their work schedules in order to have more joint leisure time, which is evidence for togetherness preferences.

摘要

如果伴侣从共同休闲时间中获得效用,预计他们会协调工作时间表以增加共同休闲的时长。为了控制约束条件和选择效应的差异,本文采用了一种新的匹配程序,以回答以下问题:(1)伴侣是否会协调他们的工作时间表,这是否会导致工作时间同步?(2)哪些伴侣同步的工作时长更多?(3)是否存在对共处的偏好?我们发现,协调会导致工作时间更同步。家庭中有孩子是一些伴侣工作时间同步程度低于其他伴侣的主要原因。最后,伴侣们协调工作时间表是为了有更多共同休闲时间,这证明了对共处的偏好。

相似文献

1
Intra-household work time synchronization: Togetherness or material benefits?
Soc Indic Res. 2007 Oct;84(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s11205-006-9072-4. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
2
Gender, nonstandard schedules, and partnership quality in the UK: Exploring heterogeneous effects through a quasi-experiment.
Soc Sci Res. 2020 Jan;85:102370. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102370. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
3
Understanding Joint Retirement.
J Econ Behav Organ. 2020 May;173:386-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.07.013. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
4
The role of partners and children for employees' psychological detachment from work and well-being.
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Jan;98(1):26-36. doi: 10.1037/a0030650. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
6
Being in the zone: physiological markers of togetherness in joint improvisation.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 5;9:187. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00187. eCollection 2015.
8
Paid work, household work, or leisure? Time allocation pathways among women following a cancer diagnosis.
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112776. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112776. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
9
The synchronization manifesto: a critique of whole-culture synchronization.
FEBS J. 2019 Dec;286(23):4650-4656. doi: 10.1111/febs.15050. Epub 2019 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Household income differentiates quantity and quality of shared spousal time.
J Fam Psychol. 2023 Jun;37(4):528-537. doi: 10.1037/fam0001078. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
2
Why Singles Prefer to Retire Later.
Res Aging. 2019 Dec;41(10):936-960. doi: 10.1177/0164027519873537.
3
Flexible working in the UK and its impact on couples' time coordination.
Rev Econ Househ. 2017;15(4):1415-1437. doi: 10.1007/s11150-017-9389-6. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
4
Daily Temporal Pathways: A Latent Class Approach to Time Diary Data.
Soc Indic Res. 2018 Jan;135(1):117-142. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1469-0. Epub 2016 Oct 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验