van Klaveren Chris, van den Brink Henriette Maassen
Department of Economics and Econometrics, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, Amsterdam, 1018 WB The Netherlands.
Soc Indic Res. 2007 Oct;84(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s11205-006-9072-4. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
If partners derive utility from joint leisure time, it is expected that they will coordinate their work schedules in order to increase the amount of joint leisure. In order to control for differences in constraints and selection effects, this paper uses a new matching procedure, providing answers to the following questions: (1) Do partners coordinate their work schedules and does this result in work time synchronization?; (2) which partners synchronize more work hours?; and (3) is there a preference for togetherness? We find that coordination results in more synchronized work hours. The presence of children in the household is the main cause why some partners synchronize their work times less than other partners. Finally, partners coordinate their work schedules in order to have more joint leisure time, which is evidence for togetherness preferences.
如果伴侣从共同休闲时间中获得效用,预计他们会协调工作时间表以增加共同休闲的时长。为了控制约束条件和选择效应的差异,本文采用了一种新的匹配程序,以回答以下问题:(1)伴侣是否会协调他们的工作时间表,这是否会导致工作时间同步?(2)哪些伴侣同步的工作时长更多?(3)是否存在对共处的偏好?我们发现,协调会导致工作时间更同步。家庭中有孩子是一些伴侣工作时间同步程度低于其他伴侣的主要原因。最后,伴侣们协调工作时间表是为了有更多共同休闲时间,这证明了对共处的偏好。