• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭收入影响夫妻共同时间的数量和质量。

Household income differentiates quantity and quality of shared spousal time.

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Texas at Austin.

出版信息

J Fam Psychol. 2023 Jun;37(4):528-537. doi: 10.1037/fam0001078. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1037/fam0001078
PMID:36892925
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10238599/
Abstract

Shared time is a centrally important component of relationship maintenance, and over the past few decades, couples have reported spending increasingly more time together. However, over this same time period divorce rates have risen much higher for lower income couples compared to higher income couples. One theorized explanation for the disparity in divorce rates between lower and higher income couples is a difference across the socioeconomic strata in the quantity and quality of time couples spend together. This theory argues that lower income couples may experience a time deficit because they face a greater number of stressors that take up time, diminishing the of time they have available to spend together. They may also need to use the time they do have available to deal with stressors rather than engaging in more enjoyable activities together, diminishing the of time they share. Using a sample of = 14,788 respondents from the American Time Use Survey, the present study examined whether household income was associated with the quantity and quality of time married couples spend together. Consistent with predictions, lower income couples spent less alone time together but this was moderated by weekday versus weekend and presence of children. Lower income couples also reported higher levels of stress during time spent with their spouse than higher income couples, and this association was moderated by hours worked by the couples. Results support the theory, indicating that quantity and quality of time may be important factors in understanding differences in relationship outcomes between lower and higher income couples. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

共享时间是维持关系的一个核心重要组成部分,在过去几十年中,夫妻双方报告称他们在一起的时间越来越多。然而,在同一时期,与高收入夫妇相比,低收入夫妇的离婚率上升得更高。对于低收入夫妇和高收入夫妇之间离婚率差异的一个理论解释是,夫妻双方在一起度过的时间的数量和质量在社会经济阶层上存在差异。这一理论认为,低收入夫妇可能会经历时间不足,因为他们面临更多的压力源,这些压力源占用了时间,减少了他们可用于一起度过的时间。他们可能还需要利用现有的时间来应对压力源,而不是一起进行更愉快的活动,从而减少他们共同度过的时间。本研究使用了来自美国时间使用调查的 14788 名已婚受访者的样本,检验了家庭收入是否与已婚夫妇在一起度过的时间的数量和质量有关。与预测一致,低收入夫妇在一起的独处时间较少,但这受到工作日与周末和是否有孩子的调节。与高收入夫妇相比,低收入夫妇在与配偶共度时光时报告的压力水平更高,这种关联受到夫妇工作时间的调节。研究结果支持了这一理论,表明时间的数量和质量可能是理解低收入和高收入夫妇之间关系结果差异的重要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90b4/10238599/4a5cfa5773e8/nihms-1873325-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90b4/10238599/1229d1f295db/nihms-1873325-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90b4/10238599/4a5cfa5773e8/nihms-1873325-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90b4/10238599/1229d1f295db/nihms-1873325-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90b4/10238599/4a5cfa5773e8/nihms-1873325-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Household income differentiates quantity and quality of shared spousal time.家庭收入影响夫妻共同时间的数量和质量。
J Fam Psychol. 2023 Jun;37(4):528-537. doi: 10.1037/fam0001078. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
2
Premarital parenthood and newlyweds' marital trajectories.婚前生育与新婚夫妇的婚姻轨迹。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Apr;34(3):279-290. doi: 10.1037/fam0000596. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
3
Moderating role of socioecological factors on web-based relationship interventions for lower income couples.社会生态因素对基于网络的低收入夫妇关系干预的调节作用。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Dec;35(8):1192-1198. doi: 10.1037/fam0000867. Epub 2021 May 24.
4
The impact of ART on union dissolution: a register-based study in Denmark 1994-2010.ART 对离婚的影响:丹麦 1994-2010 年的注册研究。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Mar 1;33(3):434-440. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey002.
5
Do couples who play together stay together? A longitudinal dyadic examination of shared leisure, financial distress, and relationship outcomes.夫妻一起玩乐能长久吗?对共同休闲、财务困境和关系结果的纵向对偶检验。
Fam Process. 2024 Mar;63(1):210-227. doi: 10.1111/famp.12869. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
6
The development of marital tension: Implications for divorce among married couples.婚姻紧张的发展:对已婚夫妇离婚的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2017 Oct;53(10):1995-2006. doi: 10.1037/dev0000379. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
7
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
8
A Comparison of Low-Income Versus Higher-Income Individuals Seeking an Online Relationship Intervention.寻求在线恋爱关系干预的低收入者与高收入者比较。
Fam Process. 2020 Dec;59(4):1434-1446. doi: 10.1111/famp.12503. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
9
Self- and partner-reported psychopathic traits' relations with couples' communication, marital satisfaction trajectories, and divorce in a longitudinal sample.在一个纵向样本中,自我和伴侣报告的精神病态特征与夫妻沟通、婚姻满意度轨迹和离婚的关系。
Personal Disord. 2018 May;9(3):239-249. doi: 10.1037/per0000233. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
10
Does coparenting improve during the OurRelationship program? Explorations within a low-income sample during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,“我们的关系”项目中亲职教育是否有所改善?对低收入样本的探索。
J Fam Psychol. 2022 Sep;36(6):1030-1035. doi: 10.1037/fam0000991. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining inequality in the time cost of waiting.审视等待时间成本中的不平等现象。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Apr;7(4):545-555. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01524-w. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
2
Does educational attainment promote job satisfaction? The bittersweet trade-offs between job resources, demands, and stress.教育程度是否能提升工作满意度?工作资源、需求和压力之间苦乐参半的权衡。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Jul;107(7):1227-1241. doi: 10.1037/apl0000904. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
3
Why time poverty matters for individuals, organisations and nations.为什么时间贫困对个人、组织和国家都很重要。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Oct;4(10):993-1003. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0920-z. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
4
Midlife in the 2020s: Opportunities and challenges.2020 年代的中年:机遇与挑战。
Am Psychol. 2020 May-Jun;75(4):470-485. doi: 10.1037/amp0000591.
5
Same-Sex Couples' Shared Time in the United States.美国同性伴侣的共同时间
Demography. 2020 Apr;57(2):475-500. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00861-z.
6
Marital Status and Mothers' Time Use: Childcare, Housework, Leisure, and Sleep.婚姻状况与母亲的时间利用:育儿、家务、休闲和睡眠
Demography. 2018 Feb;55(1):107-133. doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0647-x.
7
Buying time promotes happiness.花钱买时间能提升幸福感。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 8;114(32):8523-8527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706541114. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
8
Acknowledging the Elephant in the Room: How Stressful Environmental Contexts Shape Relationship Dynamics.正视显而易见的问题:压力环境如何塑造人际关系动态。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Feb;13:107-110. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.013.
9
Trends in Spouses' Shared Time in the United States, 1965-2012.1965 - 2012年美国配偶共同相处时间的趋势
Demography. 2016 Dec;53(6):1801-1820. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0512-8.
10
Time for Each Other: Work and Family Constraints Among Couples.相互陪伴的时间:夫妻间的工作与家庭限制
J Marriage Fam. 2016 Feb 1;78(1):142-164. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12255. Epub 2015 Oct 14.