• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普拉格雷与大剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征的比较。随机、双盲的 ACAPULCO 研究。

Prasugrel compared with high-dose clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome. The randomised, double-blind ACAPULCO study.

机构信息

Institut de Cardiologie (AP-HP), INSERM U856 and Universite Paris 6, Hopital Pitié-Salpetrière, Paris, France.

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jan;103(1):213-23. doi: 10.1160/TH09-07-0482. Epub 2009 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1160/TH09-07-0482
PMID:20062936
Abstract

Compared with the approved dose regimen of clopidogrel (300-mg loading dose [LD], 75-mg maintenance dose [MD]), prasugrel has been demonstrated to reduce ischaemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In ACS, antiplatelet effects of a prasugrel MD regimen have not been previously compared with either a higher clopidogrel MD or after switching from a higher clopidogrel LD. The objective of this study was to evaluate the antiplatelet effect of a prasugrel 10-mg MD versus a clopidogrel 150-mg MD in patients with ACS who had received a clopidogrel 900-mg LD. Patients with non-ST elevation ACS, treated with aspirin and a clopidogrel 900-mg LD, were randomised within 24 hours post-LD to receive a prasugrel 10-mg or clopidogrel 150-mg MD. After 14 days of the initial MD, subjects switched to the alternative treatment for 14 days. The primary endpoint compared maximum platelet aggregation (MPA, 20 microM adenosine diphosphate [ADP]) between prasugrel and clopidogrel MDs for both periods. Responder analyses between treatments were performed using several platelet-function methods. Of 56 randomised subjects, 37 underwent PCI. MPA was 26.2% for prasugrel 10 mg and 39.1% for clopidogrel 150 mg (p<0.001). The prasugrel MD regimen reduced MPA from the post-900-mg LD level (41.2% to 29.1%, p=0.003). Poor response ranged from 0% to 6% for prasugrel 10 mg and 4% to 34% for clopidogrel 150 mg. Thus, in ACS patients a prasugrel 10-mg MD regimen resulted in significantly greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel at twice its approved MD or a 900-mg LD.

摘要

与氯吡格雷(300 毫克负荷剂量[LD],75 毫克维持剂量[MD])的批准剂量方案相比,普拉格雷已被证明可降低接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的缺血事件。在 ACS 中,普拉格雷 MD 方案的抗血小板作用以前从未与更高剂量的氯吡格雷 MD 或从更高剂量的氯吡格雷 LD 转换后进行比较。本研究的目的是评估 ACS 患者接受氯吡格雷 900 毫克 LD 后接受普拉格雷 10 毫克 MD 与氯吡格雷 150 毫克 MD 的抗血小板作用。非 ST 段抬高型 ACS 患者,接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷 900 毫克 LD 治疗,在 LD 后 24 小时内随机分为普拉格雷 10 毫克或氯吡格雷 150 毫克 MD。初始 MD 治疗 14 天后,患者换用另一种治疗方法 14 天。主要终点比较普拉格雷和氯吡格雷 MD 两种方案在两个时期的最大血小板聚集(MPA,20μM 二磷酸腺苷[ADP])。使用几种血小板功能方法对两种治疗方法进行了应答分析。在 56 名随机患者中,37 名患者接受了 PCI。普拉格雷 10 毫克的 MPA 为 26.2%,氯吡格雷 150 毫克为 39.1%(p<0.001)。普拉格雷 MD 方案使从 LD 后 900 毫克水平的 MPA 降低(从 41.2%降至 29.1%,p=0.003)。普拉格雷 10 毫克的不良反应范围为 0%至 6%,氯吡格雷 150 毫克的不良反应范围为 4%至 34%。因此,在 ACS 患者中,普拉格雷 10 毫克 MD 方案的血小板抑制作用明显大于氯吡格雷,是其批准的 MD 的两倍或 900 毫克 LD。

相似文献

1
Prasugrel compared with high-dose clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome. The randomised, double-blind ACAPULCO study.普拉格雷与大剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征的比较。随机、双盲的 ACAPULCO 研究。
Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jan;103(1):213-23. doi: 10.1160/TH09-07-0482. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
2
Switching directly to prasugrel from clopidogrel results in greater inhibition of platelet aggregation in aspirin-treated subjects.在服用阿司匹林的患者中,从氯吡格雷直接转换为普拉格雷可导致血小板聚集受到更大程度的抑制。
Platelets. 2008 Jun;19(4):275-81. doi: 10.1080/09537100801891640.
3
Prasugrel compared with high loading- and maintenance-dose clopidogrel in patients with planned percutaneous coronary intervention: the Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 trial.在计划进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,普拉格雷与高负荷及维持剂量氯吡格雷的比较:心肌梗死溶栓治疗44试验中普拉格雷与氯吡格雷抑制血小板活化和聚集的比较。
Circulation. 2007 Dec 18;116(25):2923-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740324. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
4
A comparison of the antiplatelet effects of prasugrel and high-dose clopidogrel as assessed by VASP-phosphorylation and light transmission aggregometry.通过血管性血友病因子裂解蛋白酶(VASP)磷酸化和光透射聚集法评估普拉格雷和高剂量氯吡格雷的抗血小板作用比较。
Thromb Haemost. 2008 Jan;99(1):215-22. doi: 10.1160/TH07-09-0555.
5
Prasugrel achieves greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and a lower rate of non-responders compared with clopidogrel in aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease.在接受阿司匹林治疗的稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者中,与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷能更有效地抑制血小板聚集,且无反应者的比例更低。
Eur Heart J. 2006 May;27(10):1166-73. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi877. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
6
Prasugrel achieves greater and faster P2Y12receptor-mediated platelet inhibition than clopidogrel due to more efficient generation of its active metabolite in aspirin-treated patients with coronary artery disease.在接受阿司匹林治疗的冠心病患者中,普拉格雷比氯吡格雷能更快速且更有效地实现P2Y12受体介导的血小板抑制,因为其活性代谢产物的生成效率更高。
Eur Heart J. 2008 Jan;29(1):21-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm545. Epub 2007 Nov 30.
7
Evaluation of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: design and rationale for the TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38 (TRITON-TIMI 38).普拉格雷与氯吡格雷在急性冠脉综合征患者中的疗效评估:通过优化普拉格雷抑制血小板作用评估治疗结果改善的心肌梗死溶栓38试验(TRITON-TIMI 38)的设计与原理
Am Heart J. 2006 Oct;152(4):627-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.04.012.
8
Greater reduction of platelet activation markers and platelet-monocyte aggregates by prasugrel compared to clopidogrel in stable coronary artery disease.在稳定型冠状动脉疾病中,与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷能更大程度地降低血小板活化标志物和血小板 - 单核细胞聚集体水平。
Thromb Haemost. 2008 Oct;100(4):626-33.
9
Dose-dependent inhibition of human platelet aggregation by prasugrel and its interaction with aspirin in healthy subjects.普拉格雷对健康受试者人血小板聚集的剂量依赖性抑制及其与阿司匹林的相互作用。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2007 Mar;49(3):167-73. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318031301b.
10
Pharmacodynamic assessment of platelet inhibition by prasugrel vs. clopidogrel in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在TRITON-TIMI 38试验中对血小板抑制作用的药效学评估。
Eur Heart J. 2009 Jul;30(14):1753-63. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp159. Epub 2009 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel with different dosages in acute coronary syndrome patients with high GRACE and CRUSADE scores.替格瑞洛与不同剂量氯吡格雷在高 GRACE 和 CRUSADE 评分的急性冠脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性。
Indian Heart J. 2021 May-Jun;73(3):273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Type 1 Myocardial Infarction With a Focus on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.比较2型心肌梗死和1型心肌梗死结局并聚焦双联抗血小板治疗的荟萃分析
CJC Open. 2020 Feb 24;2(3):118-128. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.02.005. eCollection 2020 May.
3
Switching of Oral P2Y Inhibitor Treatment in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence, Predictors, and Prognosis.
急性冠状动脉综合征患者口服 P2Y12 抑制剂转换治疗:发生率、预测因素和预后。
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Mar;39(3):275-283. doi: 10.1007/s40261-018-0736-z.
4
Consensus Document ANMCO/ANCE/ARCA/GICR-IACPR/GISE/SICOA: Long-term Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.ANMCO/ANCE/ARCA/GICR - IACPR/GISE/SICOA共识文件:冠状动脉疾病患者的长期抗血小板治疗
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2018 May;20(Suppl F):F1-F74. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suy019. Epub 2018 May 31.
5
Post percutaneous coronary interventional adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events observed with prasugrel versus clopidogrel: direct comparison through a meta-analysis.普拉格雷与氯吡格雷相比,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的不良心血管结局和出血事件:通过荟萃分析进行直接比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 2;18(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0820-6.
6
Current Concepts in the Clinical Utility of Platelet Reactivity Testing.血小板反应性检测临床应用的当前概念
Interv Cardiol. 2013 Aug;8(2):100-106. doi: 10.15420/icr.2013.8.2.100.
7
Validation of a New ELISA-Based Vasodilator-Associated Stimulated Phosphoprotein Phosphorylation Assay to Assess Platelet Reactivity Index in a Chinese Population.一种基于酶联免疫吸附测定法的新型血管舒张剂相关刺激磷蛋白磷酸化检测方法在评估中国人群血小板反应性指数中的验证
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Apr;24(3):452-461. doi: 10.1177/1076029616689300. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
8
Organ transplantation and drug eluting stents: Perioperative challenges.器官移植与药物洗脱支架:围手术期挑战
World J Transplant. 2016 Dec 24;6(4):620-631. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i4.620.
9
Switching between thienopyridines in patients with acute myocardial infarction and quality of care.急性心肌梗死患者中噻吩并吡啶类药物的转换与医疗质量
Open Heart. 2016 May 23;3(1):e000384. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000384. eCollection 2016.
10
Impact of an integrated treatment algorithm based on platelet function testing and clinical risk assessment: results of the TRIAGE Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions To Improve Clinical Outcomes Through Optimal Platelet Inhibition study.基于血小板功能检测和临床风险评估的综合治疗算法的影响:通过优化血小板抑制改善临床结局的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者分诊(TRIAGE)研究结果
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016 Aug;42(2):186-96. doi: 10.1007/s11239-016-1357-0.