Suppr超能文献

在接受阿司匹林治疗的稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者中,与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷能更有效地抑制血小板聚集,且无反应者的比例更低。

Prasugrel achieves greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and a lower rate of non-responders compared with clopidogrel in aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease.

作者信息

Jernberg Tomas, Payne Christopher D, Winters Kenneth J, Darstein Christelle, Brandt John T, Jakubowski Joseph A, Naganuma Hideo, Siegbahn Agneta, Wallentin Lars

机构信息

Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology and Uppsala Clinical Research Center, University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2006 May;27(10):1166-73. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi877. Epub 2006 Apr 18.

Abstract

AIMS

This study was designed to compare the degree of inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) of prasugrel with that of clopidogrel in stable aspirin-treated patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Subjects (n=101) were randomly assigned to the following loading dose (LD) (day 1)/maintenance dose (MD) (days 2-28) combinations: prasugrel, 40 mg/5 mg; 40 mg/7.5 mg; 60 mg/10 mg; 60 mg/15 mg; or clopidogrel, 300 mg/75 mg. Turbidometric platelet aggregation was measured at multiple timepoints during the study. At 4 h after dosing, with 20 microM ADP, both prasugrel LDs achieved significantly higher mean IPA levels (60.6% and 68.4 vs. 30.0%, respectively; all P<0.0001) and lower percentage (3 vs. 52%, P<0.0001) of pharmacodynamic non-responders (defined as IPA <20%) than clopidogrel. Prasugrel 10 and 15 mg MDs achieved consistently higher mean IPA than clopidogrel 75 mg at day 28 (all P<0.0001). At pre-MD on day 28, there were no non-responders in the 10 and 15 mg prasugrel group, compared with 45% in the clopidogrel group (P=0.0007).

CONCLUSION

In this population, prasugrel (40-60 mg LD and 10-15 mg MD) achieves greater IPA and a lower proportion of pharmacodynamic non-responders compared with the approved clopidogrel dosing.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较普拉格雷与氯吡格雷对稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)且接受阿司匹林治疗患者的血小板聚集抑制程度(IPA)。

方法与结果

101名受试者被随机分配至以下负荷剂量(第1天)/维持剂量(第2 - 28天)组合:普拉格雷,40毫克/5毫克;40毫克/7.5毫克;60毫克/10毫克;60毫克/15毫克;或氯吡格雷,300毫克/75毫克。在研究期间的多个时间点测量比浊法血小板聚集情况。给药后4小时,使用20微摩尔ADP时,普拉格雷的两种负荷剂量均达到显著更高的平均IPA水平(分别为60.6%和68.4%,而氯吡格雷为30.0%;所有P<0.0001),且药效学无反应者的百分比更低(3%对52%,P<0.0001)。在第28天,普拉格雷10毫克和15毫克维持剂量的平均IPA始终高于氯吡格雷75毫克(所有P<0.0001)。在第28天维持剂量前,普拉格雷10毫克和15毫克组无无反应者,而氯吡格雷组为45%(P = 0.0007)。

结论

在此人群中,与已批准的氯吡格雷给药方案相比,普拉格雷(40 - 60毫克负荷剂量和10 - 15毫克维持剂量)实现了更大的IPA且药效学无反应者比例更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验