Fischerová D, Cibula D, Zikán M, Freitag P, Sláma J, Jancárková N, Pinkavová I, Dundr P
Onkogynekologické centrum, Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika VFN a 1. LF UK, Praha.
Ceska Gynekol. 2009 Oct;74(5):329-34.
The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and safety of ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy in advanced abdomino-pelvic tumors in a sufficiently large cohort.
Prospective study.
Oncogynecological Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Faculty Hospital of Charles University, Prague.
Patients indicated for tru-cut biopsy were those with primarily inoperable tumors, with advanced tumors and compromised performance status preventing a primary surgical procedure, and with recurrent pelvic tumors requiring histological verification. All were referred to the Oncogynecological Center between January 2005 and June 2007. Tru-cut biopsy was taken either from pelvic tumor or from its metastatic sites transvaginally or transabdominally under ultrasound guidance. Sample adequacy was evaluated.
Altogether, 119 patients were referred for tru-cut biopsy during a study period. Only 4 cases were found unsuitable for tru-cut biopsy and the patients were referred for laparoscopy instead. Samples were obtained transvaginally in 67 patients (58.3%) and transabdominally in 48 patients (41.7%). The biopsy was taken from pelvic tumor in 59 patients (51.3%), omental cake in 14 patients (12.2%), from peritoneal visceral or parietal carcinomatosis in 37 patients (32.2%) and from other localities in 5 patients (4.3 %). The diagnostic adequacy of ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy reached 94.8% (95% CI, 94.17-99.40%). There were only two tru-cut biopsy-related complications: The first case involved bleeding from tumor in a patient with mild thrombocytopenia that required laparotomy; in the second case, diagnostic laparoscopy was indicated after a minor bleeding occurred in the biopsy site on ultrasound, however, no significant pelvic bleeding was confirmed by the procedure.
Ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy is a safe, reliable, fast, and cost-effective diagnostic method for histological verification of both advanced primary and recurrent abdomino-pelvic tumors. It can be performed in an outpatient setting without the need for general anesthesia, causing a minimal discomfort to the patient in comparison with laparoscopy or laparotomy. The risk of complications is low and the main advantage is the acquirement of a sample adequate for further immunohistochemical examination, which is a necessary requirement for the choice of optimal oncological treatment.
本研究的目的是在一个足够大的队列中评估超声引导下粗针穿刺活检在晚期腹盆腔肿瘤中的准确性和安全性。
前瞻性研究。
布拉格查理大学综合医院妇产科肿瘤妇科中心。
适合进行粗针穿刺活检的患者包括那些原发性肿瘤无法手术切除、肿瘤晚期且身体状况不佳无法进行初次手术以及复发性盆腔肿瘤需要组织学验证的患者。所有患者均在2005年1月至2007年6月期间被转诊至肿瘤妇科中心。在超声引导下经阴道或经腹从盆腔肿瘤或其转移部位进行粗针穿刺活检。评估样本充足性。
在研究期间,共有119例患者被转诊进行粗针穿刺活检。仅4例患者被发现不适合进行粗针穿刺活检,转而接受腹腔镜检查。67例患者(58.3%)经阴道获取样本,48例患者(41.7%)经腹获取样本。59例患者(51.3%)的活检取自盆腔肿瘤,14例患者(12.2%)取自网膜饼,37例患者(32.2%)取自腹膜内脏或壁层转移瘤,5例患者(4.3%)取自其他部位。超声引导下粗针穿刺活检的诊断充足率达到94.8%(95%可信区间,94.17 - 99.40%)。仅发生两例与粗针穿刺活检相关的并发症:第一例是一名轻度血小板减少患者肿瘤出血,需要进行剖腹手术;第二例是在超声检查发现活检部位有少量出血后进行了诊断性腹腔镜检查,但该手术未证实有明显盆腔出血。
超声引导下粗针穿刺活检是一种安全、可靠、快速且经济有效的诊断方法,用于对晚期原发性和复发性腹盆腔肿瘤进行组织学验证。它可以在门诊环境中进行,无需全身麻醉,与腹腔镜检查或剖腹手术相比,给患者带来的不适最小。并发症风险低,主要优点是能够获取足够用于进一步免疫组化检查的样本,这是选择最佳肿瘤治疗方案的必要条件。