Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):54-60. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3341.
OBJECTIVES: Improvements in electronic health record (EHR) system development will require an understanding of psychiatric clinicians' views on EHR system acceptability, including effects on psychotherapy communications, data-recording behaviors, data accessibility versus security and privacy, data quality and clarity, communications with medical colleagues, and stigma. DESIGN: Multidisciplinary development of a survey instrument targeting psychiatric clinicians who recently switched to EHR system use, focus group testing, data analysis, and data reliability testing. MEASUREMENTS: Survey of 120 university-based, outpatient mental health clinicians, with 56 (47%) responding, conducted 18 months after transition from a paper to an EHR system. RESULTS: Factor analysis gave nine item groupings that overlapped strongly with five a priori domains. Respondents both praised and criticized the EHR system. A strong majority (81%) felt that open therapeutic communications were preserved. Regarding data quality, content, and privacy, clinicians (63%) were less willing to record highly confidential information and disagreed (83%) with including their own psychiatric records among routinely accessed EHR systems. LIMITATIONS: single time point; single academic medical center clinic setting; modest sample size; lack of prior instrument validation; survey conducted in 2005. CONCLUSIONS: In an academic medical center clinic, the presence of electronic records was not seen as a dramatic impediment to therapeutic communications. Concerns regarding privacy and data security were significant, and may contribute to reluctances to adopt electronic records in other settings. Further study of clinicians' views and use patterns may be helpful in guiding development and deployment of electronic records systems.
目的:要改进电子健康记录(EHR)系统的开发,就必须了解精神科临床医生对 EHR 系统可接受性的看法,包括其对心理治疗沟通、数据记录行为、数据可及性与安全性和隐私、数据质量和清晰度、与医疗同事的沟通以及污名化的影响。
设计:针对最近开始使用 EHR 系统的精神科临床医生,采用多学科方法开发调查工具,进行焦点小组测试、数据分析和数据可靠性测试。
测量:对 120 名大学门诊心理健康临床医生进行调查,其中 56 名(47%)做出回应,在从纸质病历过渡到 EHR 系统 18 个月后进行。
结果:因素分析得出了九个项目分组,与五个事先确定的领域高度重叠。受访者对 EHR 系统既有好评也有批评。绝大多数(81%)人认为开放的治疗沟通得到了保留。关于数据质量、内容和隐私,临床医生(63%)不太愿意记录高度机密信息,并且不同意(83%)将自己的精神科记录纳入常规访问的 EHR 系统中。
局限性:单一时间点;单一学术医疗中心诊所环境;样本量适中;缺乏事先的仪器验证;调查于 2005 年进行。
结论:在学术医疗中心的诊所中,电子记录的存在并没有被视为治疗沟通的巨大障碍。对隐私和数据安全的担忧非常严重,可能会导致在其他环境中对采用电子记录的抵触。进一步研究临床医生的观点和使用模式可能有助于指导电子记录系统的开发和部署。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015-4
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015-10-14
Adv Genet (Hoboken). 2022-9-7
J Med Internet Res. 2023-3-31
J Med Syst. 2023-2-13
J Med Internet Res. 2022-5-4
N Engl J Med. 2009-4-16
N Engl J Med. 2009-4-9
Methods Inf Med. 2008
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007
Lancet. 2007-9-8
Int J Med Inform. 2007
Int J Med Inform. 2006-8
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005