• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康记录采用者:基于患者隐私关注和感知收益的分类。

Electronic health record adopters: a typology based on patients' privacy concerns and perceived benefits.

机构信息

IAE Clermont Auvergne School of Management - CleRMa, - Research chair "health and territories", University Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

ICD International Business School - LARA, Management Department, Paris, France.

出版信息

Public Health. 2022 Jun;207:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2022.03.010
PMID:35486983
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patients' adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) varies substantially. Although some countries, such as Estonia and Denmark, are sufficiently advanced in terms of EHR generalisation, others, such as France, are figuring out how to implement and disseminate EHRs. These governments must respond to patients' disparities to achieve the expected performance for healthcare systems and improve the quality of care delivery. This study investigates patients' perceived benefits and privacy concerns related to EHRs to develop a typology of patients, identify the characteristics of different clusters and propose practical measures for public policy-makers.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional study using online questionnaires.

METHODS

An online quantitative survey was carried out in France. The final sample of EHR non-users (N = 1076) was fitted to be representative of the French population by age and gender, region and socioprofessional status. Hierarchical and non-hierarchical cluster analyses were performed. Several robustness check analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

Cluster analyses identified four patient clusters: the worried, who show the highest mean privacy concern and risk levels related to health data disclosure; the ready adopters, who lack privacy concerns and risk and are the most motivated by EHR benefits; the concerned adopters, who express far fewer privacy concerns and perceive EHR benefits more favourably than the worried adopters; and the balanced adopters, who are relatively similar to the ready adopters in their EHR motives and are still concerned about their health data, suggesting a segment that is easier to convince. Comparing clusters regarding the intentions to create EHRs and willingness to disclose health data confirms that ready adopters, followed by balanced adopters, are more likely to create an EHR and disclose health data. The concerned adopters and, finally, the worried exhibit the lowest intentions for EHR creation and data disclosure.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide meaningful insights into patient profiles and expectations. The findings underscore the need to implement targeting policies for each cluster and design concrete solutions for improving EHR performance.

摘要

目的

患者对电子健康记录 (EHR) 的采用程度存在很大差异。尽管有些国家,如爱沙尼亚和丹麦,在 EHR 推广方面已经相当先进,但其他国家,如法国,仍在探索如何实施和传播 EHR。这些国家的政府必须应对患者之间的差异,以实现医疗体系的预期绩效并提高护理质量。本研究旨在调查患者对 EHR 的感知益处和隐私顾虑,以对患者进行分类,确定不同群体的特征,并为公共政策制定者提出切实可行的措施。

研究设计

我们采用横断面研究设计,通过在线问卷进行。

方法

在法国进行了一项在线定量调查。通过年龄、性别、地区和社会职业地位对 EHR 非使用者(N=1076)的最终样本进行了代表性调整。进行了层次聚类分析和非层次聚类分析。还进行了几种稳健性检查分析。

结果

聚类分析确定了四个患者群体:担忧者,他们表现出最高的隐私关注和与健康数据披露相关的风险水平;准备采用者,他们对隐私问题和风险缺乏关注,并且最受 EHR 益处的激励;关注采用者,他们对隐私问题的关注程度远低于担忧者,并且对 EHR 益处的看法更为有利;以及平衡采用者,他们在 EHR 动机方面与准备采用者相对相似,并且仍然对自己的健康数据表示关注,这表明他们是一个更容易被说服的群体。比较不同群体关于创建 EHR 和披露健康数据的意愿,证实了准备采用者(其次是平衡采用者)更有可能创建 EHR 并披露健康数据。而关注采用者,最后是担忧者,对创建 EHR 和披露健康数据的意愿最低。

结论

结果为患者的特征和期望提供了有意义的见解。研究结果强调了为每个群体实施有针对性的政策和设计具体解决方案以改善 EHR 性能的必要性。

相似文献

1
Electronic health record adopters: a typology based on patients' privacy concerns and perceived benefits.电子健康记录采用者:基于患者隐私关注和感知收益的分类。
Public Health. 2022 Jun;207:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
2
Public and physician's expectations and ethical concerns about electronic health record: Benefits outweigh risks except for information security.公众和医生对电子健康记录的期望和伦理关注:除了信息安全外,好处大于风险。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Feb;110:98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
3
Do personal health concerns and trust in healthcare providers mitigate privacy concerns? Effects on patients' intention to share personal health data on electronic health records.个人健康问题和对医疗服务提供者的信任是否会减轻对隐私的担忧?对患者在电子健康记录中分享个人健康数据意愿的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;283:114146. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114146. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
The double-edged sword of electronic health records: implications for patient disclosure.电子健康记录的双刃剑:对患者信息披露的影响
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Apr;22(e1):e130-40. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002804. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
5
Trust Me, I'm a Doctor: Examining Changes in How Privacy Concerns Affect Patient Withholding Behavior.相信我,我是医生:审视隐私担忧影响患者隐瞒行为方式的变化。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 4;19(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6296.
6
EHR adopters vs. non-adopters: Impacts of, barriers to, and federal initiatives for EHR adoption.电子健康档案采用者与非采用者:电子健康档案采用的影响、障碍和联邦举措。
Healthc (Amst). 2014 Mar;2(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
7
Patient and public views about the security and privacy of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in the UK: results from a mixed methods study.英国患者及公众对电子健康记录(EHRs)安全性和隐私性的看法:一项混合方法研究的结果
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Oct 14;15:86. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0202-2.
8
Factors affecting patient and public perceptions of the adoption of electronic health record sharing: A Hong Kong study.影响患者和公众对电子健康记录共享采用的看法的因素:一项香港研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Oct;178:105193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105193. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
9
Consumers are ready to accept the transition to online and electronic records if they can be assured of the security measures.如果消费者能够确信安全措施到位,他们就愿意接受向在线和电子记录的转变。
MedGenMed. 2007 Jan 11;9(1):8.
10
How are Electronic Health Records Associated with Provider Productivity and Billing in Orthopaedic Surgery?电子健康记录如何与矫形外科医生的生产力和计费相关联?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Nov;477(11):2443-2451. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000896.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing uploads of health data in the electronic health record-The role of framing and length of privacy information: A survey study in Germany.增强电子健康记录中健康数据的上传——隐私信息的框架和长度的作用:德国的一项调查研究
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 31;11:20552076251351197. doi: 10.1177/20552076251351197. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Factors Driving Patient Decisions to Access Electronic Health Records via a Breast Cancer Online Decision Aid linked to the Patient Portal.促使患者通过与患者门户网站相连的乳腺癌在线决策辅助工具访问电子健康记录的因素。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:1159-1168. eCollection 2024.
3
Trustworthiness of the electronic health record in Germany: an exploratory, user-centered analysis.
德国电子健康记录的可信度:一项探索性的、以用户为中心的分析。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 7;7:1473326. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1473326. eCollection 2025.
4
Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records and Information Practices in Mental Health Care Contexts: Scoping Review.精神卫生保健背景下患者可访问的电子健康记录及信息实践:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 7;27:e54973. doi: 10.2196/54973.
5
Influence of Disease-Related Stigma on Patients' Decisions to Upload Medical Reports to the German Electronic Health Record: Randomized Controlled Trial.疾病污名对患者将医疗报告上传至德国电子健康记录决策的影响:随机对照试验。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 10;11:e52625. doi: 10.2196/52625.
6
Measuring the willingness to share personal health information: a systematic review.测量个人健康信息共享意愿:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;11:1213615. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1213615. eCollection 2023.