Molet Mikaël, Jozefowiez Jeremie, Miller Ralph R
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, NY 13902, USA.
Learn Behav. 2010 Feb;38(1):27-34. doi: 10.3758/LB.38.1.27.
Three experiments tested human participants on a two-dimensional, computer, landmark-based search task to assess the integration of independently acquired spatial and temporal relationships. Experiment 1 showed that A-B spatial training followed by B-outcome spatial training resulted in spatial integration in such a way that A was effectively associated with the outcome. Experiment 2 showed that A-B spatial and temporal training followed by B-outcome spatial and temporal training resulted in integration that created both spatial and temporal relationships between A and the outcome. Experiment 3 refuted an alternative explanation, one that is based on decision-making speed, to the temporal-integration strategy that was suggested by Experiment 2. These results replicate in humans the observations regarding spatial integration made by Sawa, Leising, and Blaisdell (2005) using a spatial-search task with pigeons, and they extend those observations to temporal integration.
三项实验让人类参与者完成了一项基于地标、二维的计算机搜索任务,以评估独立获取的空间和时间关系的整合情况。实验1表明,先进行A-B空间训练,再进行B-结果空间训练,会导致空间整合,使得A与结果有效关联。实验2表明,先进行A-B空间和时间训练,再进行B-结果空间和时间训练,会导致整合,从而在A与结果之间建立起空间和时间关系。实验3驳斥了一种基于决策速度的替代性解释,该解释针对实验2所提出的时间整合策略。这些结果在人类中重现了泽瓦、莱辛和布莱斯德尔(2005年)使用鸽子空间搜索任务所做的关于空间整合的观察,并且将这些观察扩展到了时间整合。